From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: 周琰杰 <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sboyd@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
dongsheng.qiu@ingenic.com, aric.pzqi@ingenic.com,
rick.tyliu@ingenic.com, yanfei.li@ingenic.com,
sernia.zhou@foxmail.com, zhenwenjin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: X1000: Add support for calculat REFCLK of USB PHY.
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 19:36:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AKNJCQ.6UUHR0DBDE8E2@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626164844.25436-3-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>
Hi Zhou,
Le sam. 27 juin 2020 à 0:48, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
<zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> a écrit :
> Add new functions to "x1000_otg_phy_ops" to calculat the rate of
> REFCLK,
> which is needed by USB PHY in the Ingenic X1000 SoC.
>
> Tested-by: 周正 (Zhou Zheng) <sernia.zhou@foxmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c | 113
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c
> b/drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c
> index 453f3323cb99..a61c16f98a11 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/x1000-cgu.c
> @@ -48,8 +48,114 @@
> #define USBPCR_SIDDQ BIT(21)
> #define USBPCR_OTG_DISABLE BIT(20)
>
> +/* bits within the USBPCR1 register */
> +#define USBPCR1_REFCLKSEL_SHIFT 26
> +#define USBPCR1_REFCLKSEL_MASK (0x3 << USBPCR1_REFCLKSEL_SHIFT)
> +#define USBPCR1_REFCLKSEL_CORE (0x2 << USBPCR1_REFCLKSEL_SHIFT)
> +#define USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_SHIFT 24
> +#define USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_MASK (0x3 << USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_SHIFT)
> +#define USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_48 (0x2 << USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_SHIFT)
> +#define USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_24 (0x1 << USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_SHIFT)
> +#define USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_12 (0x0 << USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_SHIFT)
> +
> static struct ingenic_cgu *cgu;
>
> +static u8 x1000_otg_phy_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + /* we only use CLKCORE, revisit if that ever changes */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int x1000_otg_phy_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 idx)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 usbpcr1;
> +
> + if (idx > 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
> +
> + usbpcr1 = readl(cgu->base + CGU_REG_USBPCR1);
> + usbpcr1 &= ~USBPCR1_REFCLKSEL_MASK;
> + /* we only use CLKCORE */
> + usbpcr1 |= USBPCR1_REFCLKSEL_CORE;
> + writel(usbpcr1, cgu->base + CGU_REG_USBPCR1);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
> + return 0;
> +}
If you only support one parent, maybe set that bit in the
x1000_cgu_init(), then you can drop the get_parent/set_parent.
> +
> +static unsigned long x1000_otg_phy_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + u32 usbpcr1;
> + unsigned refclk_div;
> +
> + usbpcr1 = readl(cgu->base + CGU_REG_USBPCR1);
> + refclk_div = usbpcr1 & USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_MASK;
> +
> + switch (refclk_div) {
> + case USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_12:
> + return 12000000;
> +
> + case USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_24:
> + return 24000000;
> +
> + case USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_48:
> + return 48000000;
> + }
On your setup, what frequency is configured for the "otg" clock? Is it
48 MHz?
I believe CLKCORE is the OTG core's clock (aka "otg"), and I'm pretty
sure that these fields only represent CLKCORE/4, CLKCORE/2, CLKCORE/1,
but the doc expects CLKCORE==48MHz.
In that case the "otg_phy" should be parented to "otg", and the rate
should be computed according to the parent rate and the divider
configured.
> +
> + BUG();
Don't use BUG() - it pisses off Linus :)
And it's reserved for bugs that will take the whole system down, I
think. Better use WARN().
Cheers,
-Paul
> + return parent_rate;
> +}
> +
> +static long x1000_otg_phy_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned
> long req_rate,
> + unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
> + if (req_rate < 18000000)
> + return 12000000;
> +
> + if (req_rate < 36000000)
> + return 24000000;
> +
> + return 48000000;
> +}
> +
> +static int x1000_otg_phy_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long
> req_rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 usbpcr1, div_bits;
> +
> + switch (req_rate) {
> + case 12000000:
> + div_bits = USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_12;
> + break;
> +
> + case 24000000:
> + div_bits = USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_24;
> + break;
> +
> + case 48000000:
> + div_bits = USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_48;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags);
> +
> + usbpcr1 = readl(cgu->base + CGU_REG_USBPCR1);
> + usbpcr1 &= ~USBPCR1_REFCLKDIV_MASK;
> + usbpcr1 |= div_bits;
> + writel(usbpcr1, cgu->base + CGU_REG_USBPCR1);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int x1000_usb_phy_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> void __iomem *reg_opcr = cgu->base + CGU_REG_OPCR;
> @@ -80,6 +186,13 @@ static int x1000_usb_phy_is_enabled(struct clk_hw
> *hw)
> }
>
> static const struct clk_ops x1000_otg_phy_ops = {
> + .get_parent = x1000_otg_phy_get_parent,
> + .set_parent = x1000_otg_phy_set_parent,
> +
> + .recalc_rate = x1000_otg_phy_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = x1000_otg_phy_round_rate,
> + .set_rate = x1000_otg_phy_set_rate,
> +
> .enable = x1000_usb_phy_enable,
> .disable = x1000_usb_phy_disable,
> .is_enabled = x1000_usb_phy_is_enabled,
> --
> 2.11.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-26 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-26 16:48 [PATCH 0/2] Add functions to operate USB PHY related clock 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2020-06-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: JZ4780: Add functions for enable and disable USB PHY 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2020-06-26 17:20 ` Paul Cercueil
2020-06-28 16:10 ` Zhou Yanjie
2020-06-26 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: X1000: Add support for calculat REFCLK of " 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
2020-06-26 17:36 ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2020-06-28 16:18 ` Zhou Yanjie
2020-06-28 17:03 ` Paul Cercueil
2020-06-30 12:26 ` Zhou Yanjie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AKNJCQ.6UUHR0DBDE8E2@crapouillou.net \
--to=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=aric.pzqi@ingenic.com \
--cc=dongsheng.qiu@ingenic.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rick.tyliu@ingenic.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sernia.zhou@foxmail.com \
--cc=yanfei.li@ingenic.com \
--cc=zhenwenjin@gmail.com \
--cc=zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox