From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C5530B517 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776263573; cv=none; b=OEqdfGlb6Zd81sPk8abrpigSlc7hciGkJ4+fvQLjm1VAPefkWGN/eYVSqcTIcNYWYZDMAu9+jvCMSwoqQT0WMvIy1AtSgLd1rIfIjbM9JS9nuRqMi1MM+BNJLP7Rw1jaw9Vh3TkMefv98rW6vlyg0nzNxYC/5KCqCUOD8zlCKss= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776263573; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3HepdRyQzPaOaFk8Iiiaa5QdNKTntj32oiu0bvvizxc=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=ExXYKonyLrmibILw2/4cvhF57PLcgvcTJaO+ySBORNACOhsiBDkptBxOgycx8OWwQI9as7fd45HMqKttvXxHNqj5dCDShR98RzAR5OAZ2fV0o8O/vzTTONDFpvI6+EL0/bhF5hmPUUErFh/FVbKLQiJFoPHiAP+D72fMsVLDo4s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=Bam28bm+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Bam28bm+" Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-488b0e1b870so106030685e9.2 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:32:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1776263570; x=1776868370; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=3HepdRyQzPaOaFk8Iiiaa5QdNKTntj32oiu0bvvizxc=; b=Bam28bm+ncD9dKmSXk1HY3yKj1vcZTykVVsHCQowM1JvCRS66Y/BEaMJ6OBsdcyPxk YKGMP7EK+y8sFAOTPg2QC4eTYq0dMufgbvnmolLd5/muta6S3vmtBpoE20AzcXHhojzc LtGAmcu5m7lYSMnvBUwjjwOHI+KH2gdt3swlGifTpq9ZF3L1DY7P1eXyms5IwmbtcCus fdIDSO/S4k/qNaYYAF89EPzoVBhGSGAtjhJP4mZh0JsoEpxl8HISVTbZBYrBzrO1dBZy 5OXTW7NoytYFdTzfprV2k1orF/a6TpBIpR8hJXMlsrHdFd5AgUhbjqtz30c+QHts1zi5 Zn3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776263570; x=1776868370; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3HepdRyQzPaOaFk8Iiiaa5QdNKTntj32oiu0bvvizxc=; b=qzuPaqD6VtgpIxLzExuceL/yB0VtDCfTllrTKRxTUurqAvh/9f/9FvS478MpufrpNq DsH6aElkqdZSAGUx5dRkFIOBParUKrg1sAlRVQms7ilk9RQzfzgc4hLpVesKtobFsX/D bTZVUKDRXHAaYvafsixD0FBtkL3QAbCBOwXVgIaU4pmcs5Npjmu0NiSf8/CIeDdrbReG CPXoDuT2VllznqVgnhayCHqICTOVNXfGsiSa/ojFA3M5gqCoPfj3WbIcICiwI78di8Nx hY4rcS/0sEvrl+aXvz3rEIR6cEio6EAV0dQV4+VNXY77Wnac9D6j/TUbUuZvFF8pi3Ji BZ7Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9GI3STyhb+D5nwDH+PhgXrIQFZdAPr1N9jXs6a7gSe4w8WjgRSxZQ0oRrkMpjlwpI+9JyaThLYN6w=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy9FNrerXsZQV3NuDAxx4qPiIoOqQoZcRUix3tPvug4xep4V7d7 GheeRiorXePVvnYv84yCI1SN/6ZVlK5Ag1u2LkiLFOwiMnwLoMVSNlmPgs1e9FZe1p0= X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiev7yFq1VdkV0tRWaKi1sGXN7H1sy41tzARCeQiRaGGlyHgSnM+e5zezuk5ykIi Dfx2mzaYYD9OjCRJ5HaMFSYSwckUNSonfoshjqA+0q/EFIUZAshDcmVG/lduFco8RvXsQprODqQ 4ng/t2paOD9YuV/z0NUqmHtJ/nGtmogVHaFiUlberJ8jGZIhUDKM8diR+7yn09yT2rh0JXiAJj9 te0ThTSs/horB+SgfKEXnZjPEnKapkvLp8PrKQinQYGOq0EjeiVy+pKWfE9hyAfbN9GqjSdqhgu ZCcReISz5Aq1mDe2RunHrRAtQxAIyhbyX5mNR9RjtGLLW5ETg9zKI+i4nvt2MU99ifSfQWM538k kSZ1YB18YPdKUfRTs4GzEUv/d78VIQSKtCRWytb1OEdQTgrkDE3QTWc6G9JIWexRMJ76BU5p2kI w4/wjpV93a0qajMrYxtD/4jhYQ7SKmf/3yeVfNXzbryEuZpIgZw0ZTZuPyZYH0zCR2XWPoRrYjZ xaQfkHjQI78LOHXbg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3149:b0:488:ab26:8fe0 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-488d68432f2mr298691635e9.15.1776263570072; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([212.187.182.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-488f4352900sm2651745e9.1.2026.04.15.07.32.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:32:48 +0100 Message-Id: Cc: "Sylwester Nawrocki" , "Chanwoo Choi" , "Alim Akhtar" , "Sam Protsenko" , "Michael Turquette" , "Stephen Boyd" , "Rob Herring" , "Conor Dooley" , "Tudor Ambarus" , "Jassi Brar" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Peter Griffin" , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Exynos850 APM-to-AP mailbox support From: "Alexey Klimov" To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20260320-exynos850-ap2apm-mailbox-v1-0-983eb3f296fc@linaro.org> <20260321-beautiful-garnet-magpie-de4fbd@quoll> <5d645bb0-22cd-4e96-b8b6-15c4bb83d87d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <5d645bb0-22cd-4e96-b8b6-15c4bb83d87d@kernel.org> On Thu Apr 2, 2026 at 7:43 AM BST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 02/04/2026 04:19, Alexey Klimov wrote: >> On Sat Mar 21, 2026 at 10:44 AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 09:15:12PM +0000, Alexey Klimov wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This patch series introduces support for the APM-to-AP mailbox on the= =20 >>>> Exynos850 SoC. This mailbox is required for communicating with the APM= =20 >>>> co-processor using ACPM. >>>> >>>> The Exynos850 mailbox operates similarly to the existing gs101=20 >>>> implementation, but the register offsets and IRQ mask bits differ.=20 >>>> This series abstracts these differences into platform-specific data=20 >>>> structures matched via the device tree. >>>> >>>> Also, it requires APM-to-AP mailbox clock in CMU_APM block. >>>> >>>> In theory this can be split into two series with correct dependecies: >>>> device tree node requires clock changes to be merged. The suggestion >>>> is to let this go through Samsung SoC tree with corresponding acks >>>> if it is okay. >>> >>> I don't understand why this cannot be split into two seris >>> *practically*. What is exactly the dependency between mailbox and DTS, >>> that it had to be combined here? >>=20 >> Do you suggest to send 3 single patches with proper dependencies >> description? DT bindings change first, then mailbox change that specific= ally >> depends on dt-bindings change and then dts update (which will depend on = both)? >>=20 >> I thought that mbox driver change depends implicitly on bindings update? > > Please don't answer to a question with a question. Actually three > questions. If you cannot give argument why there is a dependency, feels > to me like you send something you do not understand. Sorry. You're right on the first part. Couldn't say anything about last par= t. So I saw series where DTS enablement changes are included in the series after changes in drivers were introduced. I guess it is more preferred to split out DTS changes (also considering that kernel without these changes should be able to boot with new DTS and vice versa). I can split out DTS change(s), yes. There should/must be no dependency. Thanks. Best regards, Alexey