From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, mturquette@baylibre.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] clk: ingenic-tcu: Fix missing TCU clock for X1000 SoCs
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:39:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EA09AR.6F7SVEL62WAI1@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220412122750.279058-3-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
Hi,
Le mar., avril 12 2022 at 13:27:50 +0100, Aidan MacDonald
<aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com> a écrit :
> The TCU clock gate on X1000 wasn't requested by the driver and could
> be gated automatically later on in boot, which prevents timers from
> running and breaks PWM.
>
> Add a workaround to support old device trees that don't specify the
> "tcu" clock gate. In this case the kernel will print a warning and
> attempt to continue without the clock, which is wrong, but it could
> work if "clk_ignore_unused" is in the kernel arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cheers,
-Paul
> ---
> drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c b/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> index 77acfbeb4830..201bf6e6b6e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct ingenic_soc_info {
> unsigned int num_channels;
> bool has_ost;
> bool has_tcu_clk;
> + bool allow_missing_tcu_clk;
> };
>
> struct ingenic_tcu_clk_info {
> @@ -320,7 +321,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_soc_info
> jz4770_soc_info = {
> static const struct ingenic_soc_info x1000_soc_info = {
> .num_channels = 8,
> .has_ost = false, /* X1000 has OST, but it not belong TCU */
> - .has_tcu_clk = false,
> + .has_tcu_clk = true,
> + .allow_missing_tcu_clk = true,
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused
> ingenic_tcu_of_match[] __initconst = {
> @@ -355,14 +357,27 @@ static int __init ingenic_tcu_probe(struct
> device_node *np)
> tcu->clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "tcu");
> if (IS_ERR(tcu->clk)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(tcu->clk);
> - pr_crit("Cannot get TCU clock\n");
> - goto err_free_tcu;
> - }
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(tcu->clk);
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_crit("Unable to enable TCU clock\n");
> - goto err_put_clk;
> + /*
> + * Old device trees for some SoCs did not include the
> + * TCU clock because this driver (incorrectly) didn't
> + * use it. In this case we complain loudly and attempt
> + * to continue without the clock, which might work if
> + * booting with workarounds like "clk_ignore_unused".
> + */
> + if (tcu->soc_info->allow_missing_tcu_clk && ret == -EINVAL) {
> + pr_warn("TCU clock missing from device tree, please update your
> device tree\n");
> + tcu->clk = NULL;
> + } else {
> + pr_crit("Cannot get TCU clock from device tree\n");
> + goto err_free_tcu;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(tcu->clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_crit("Unable to enable TCU clock\n");
> + goto err_put_clk;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -432,10 +447,10 @@ static int __init ingenic_tcu_probe(struct
> device_node *np)
> clk_hw_unregister(tcu->clocks->hws[i]);
> kfree(tcu->clocks);
> err_clk_disable:
> - if (tcu->soc_info->has_tcu_clk)
> + if (tcu->clk)
> clk_disable_unprepare(tcu->clk);
> err_put_clk:
> - if (tcu->soc_info->has_tcu_clk)
> + if (tcu->clk)
> clk_put(tcu->clk);
> err_free_tcu:
> kfree(tcu);
> --
> 2.35.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-12 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 12:27 [PATCH v5 0/2] Fix missing TCU clock for X1000/X1830 SoCs Aidan MacDonald
2022-04-12 12:27 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] mips: dts: ingenic: Add TCU clock to x1000/x1830 tcu device node Aidan MacDonald
2022-04-12 22:38 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-04-12 12:27 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] clk: ingenic-tcu: Fix missing TCU clock for X1000 SoCs Aidan MacDonald
2022-04-12 22:39 ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2022-05-18 20:47 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-18 23:02 ` Aidan MacDonald
2022-05-19 0:31 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EA09AR.6F7SVEL62WAI1@crapouillou.net \
--to=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox