public inbox for linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, mturquette@baylibre.com,
	sboyd@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] clk: ingenic-tcu: Fix missing TCU clock for X1000 SoCs
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:39:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EA09AR.6F7SVEL62WAI1@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220412122750.279058-3-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>

Hi,

Le mar., avril 12 2022 at 13:27:50 +0100, Aidan MacDonald 
<aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com> a écrit :
> The TCU clock gate on X1000 wasn't requested by the driver and could
> be gated automatically later on in boot, which prevents timers from
> running and breaks PWM.
> 
> Add a workaround to support old device trees that don't specify the
> "tcu" clock gate. In this case the kernel will print a warning and
> attempt to continue without the clock, which is wrong, but it could
> work if "clk_ignore_unused" is in the kernel arguments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>

Cheers,
-Paul

> ---
>  drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c b/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> index 77acfbeb4830..201bf6e6b6e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/tcu.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct ingenic_soc_info {
>  	unsigned int num_channels;
>  	bool has_ost;
>  	bool has_tcu_clk;
> +	bool allow_missing_tcu_clk;
>  };
> 
>  struct ingenic_tcu_clk_info {
> @@ -320,7 +321,8 @@ static const struct ingenic_soc_info 
> jz4770_soc_info = {
>  static const struct ingenic_soc_info x1000_soc_info = {
>  	.num_channels = 8,
>  	.has_ost = false, /* X1000 has OST, but it not belong TCU */
> -	.has_tcu_clk = false,
> +	.has_tcu_clk = true,
> +	.allow_missing_tcu_clk = true,
>  };
> 
>  static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused 
> ingenic_tcu_of_match[] __initconst = {
> @@ -355,14 +357,27 @@ static int __init ingenic_tcu_probe(struct 
> device_node *np)
>  		tcu->clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "tcu");
>  		if (IS_ERR(tcu->clk)) {
>  			ret = PTR_ERR(tcu->clk);
> -			pr_crit("Cannot get TCU clock\n");
> -			goto err_free_tcu;
> -		}
> 
> -		ret = clk_prepare_enable(tcu->clk);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			pr_crit("Unable to enable TCU clock\n");
> -			goto err_put_clk;
> +			/*
> +			 * Old device trees for some SoCs did not include the
> +			 * TCU clock because this driver (incorrectly) didn't
> +			 * use it. In this case we complain loudly and attempt
> +			 * to continue without the clock, which might work if
> +			 * booting with workarounds like "clk_ignore_unused".
> +			 */
> +			if (tcu->soc_info->allow_missing_tcu_clk && ret == -EINVAL) {
> +				pr_warn("TCU clock missing from device tree, please update your 
> device tree\n");
> +				tcu->clk = NULL;
> +			} else {
> +				pr_crit("Cannot get TCU clock from device tree\n");
> +				goto err_free_tcu;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			ret = clk_prepare_enable(tcu->clk);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				pr_crit("Unable to enable TCU clock\n");
> +				goto err_put_clk;
> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> @@ -432,10 +447,10 @@ static int __init ingenic_tcu_probe(struct 
> device_node *np)
>  			clk_hw_unregister(tcu->clocks->hws[i]);
>  	kfree(tcu->clocks);
>  err_clk_disable:
> -	if (tcu->soc_info->has_tcu_clk)
> +	if (tcu->clk)
>  		clk_disable_unprepare(tcu->clk);
>  err_put_clk:
> -	if (tcu->soc_info->has_tcu_clk)
> +	if (tcu->clk)
>  		clk_put(tcu->clk);
>  err_free_tcu:
>  	kfree(tcu);
> --
> 2.35.1
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-12 12:27 [PATCH v5 0/2] Fix missing TCU clock for X1000/X1830 SoCs Aidan MacDonald
2022-04-12 12:27 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] mips: dts: ingenic: Add TCU clock to x1000/x1830 tcu device node Aidan MacDonald
2022-04-12 22:38   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-04-12 12:27 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] clk: ingenic-tcu: Fix missing TCU clock for X1000 SoCs Aidan MacDonald
2022-04-12 22:39   ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2022-05-18 20:47   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-18 23:02     ` Aidan MacDonald
2022-05-19  0:31   ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EA09AR.6F7SVEL62WAI1@crapouillou.net \
    --to=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox