From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] clk: socfpga: clk-pll: Optimize local variables
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 14:22:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FC8B34B6-642F-4228-90FB-D8B3148C03D3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0BD7D71D-6F6B-4864-BEA7-E13563908D62@linux.dev>
On 8. Apr 2025, at 19:45, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> On 19. Feb 2025, at 13:42, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> On 2/19/25 04:42, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>>> Since readl() returns a u32, the local variables reg and bypass can also
>>> have the data type u32. Furthermore, divf and divq are derived from reg
>>> and can also be a u32.
>>> Since do_div() casts the divisor to u32 anyway, changing the data type
>>> of divq to u32 removes the following Coccinelle/coccicheck warning
>>> reported by do_div.cocci:
>>> WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead
>>> Compile-tested only.
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-pll.c | 4 ++--
>>
>> Applied!
>
> Did this patch and [*] get lost somehow?
>
> They aren't in -next and also didn't make it into the last merge window.
Does anybody else know what happened or where I could find them?
Thanks,
Thorsten
> [*] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250219104435.1525-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-22 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 10:42 [RESEND PATCH] clk: socfpga: clk-pll: Optimize local variables Thorsten Blum
2025-02-19 12:42 ` Dinh Nguyen
2025-04-08 17:45 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-04-22 12:22 ` Thorsten Blum [this message]
2025-04-24 22:33 ` Dinh Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FC8B34B6-642F-4228-90FB-D8B3148C03D3@linux.dev \
--to=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox