From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ingenic-tcu: Properly enable registers before accessing timers
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:44:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <TDQ9DR.SDDTZMEA0H7F3@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <qONO5Rg11q4yBfTVshsrN1odktNWOtHV@localhost>
Le ven., juin 10 2022 at 16:43:27 +0100, Aidan MacDonald
<aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> Quoting Aidan MacDonald (2022-06-03 06:47:05)
>>> Access to registers is guarded by
>>> ingenic_tcu_{enable,disable}_regs()
>>> so the stop bit can be cleared before accessing a timer channel,
>>> but
>>> those functions did not clear the stop bit on SoCs with a global
>>> TCU
>>> clock gate.
>>>
>>> Testing on the X1000 has revealed that the stop bits must be
>>> cleared
>>> _and_ the global TCU clock must be ungated to access timer
>>> registers.
>>> Programming manuals for the X1000, JZ4740, and JZ4725B specify this
>>> behavior. If the stop bit isn't cleared, then writes to registers
>>> do
>>> not take effect, which can leave clocks with no defined parent when
>>> registered and leave clock tree state out of sync with the
>>> hardware,
>>> triggering bugs in downstream drivers relying on TCU clocks.
>>>
>>> Fixing this is easy: have ingenic_tcu_{enable,disable}_regs()
>>> always
>>> clear the stop bit, regardless of the presence of a global TCU
>>> gate.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Any Fixes: tag?
>
> Probably 4f89e4b8f121 ("clk: ingenic: Add driver for the TCU clocks")
> but I don't have docs or hardware to confirm the bug affects the
> jz4770,
> which is the only other SoC affected by the change.
>
> I think what caused my problem was my bootloader stopping all the
> timer
> channels. The stop bits are supposed to be zeroed at reset, so I'd
> guess
> the jz4770 relied on that and only worked by accident.
I'll test it on JZ4770 this weekend.
> I'll send a v2 along shortly. Is it worth CC'ing stable as well?
If the bug is in jz-5.18 or earlier, yes.
Cheers,
-Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-10 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-03 13:47 [PATCH] clk: ingenic-tcu: Properly enable registers before accessing timers Aidan MacDonald
2022-06-09 22:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-06-10 15:43 ` Aidan MacDonald
2022-06-10 15:44 ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2022-06-10 16:24 ` Aidan MacDonald
2022-06-13 9:02 ` Paul Cercueil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=TDQ9DR.SDDTZMEA0H7F3@crapouillou.net \
--to=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox