From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D355AC43217 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 13:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231512AbiKCNV6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:21:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58546 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231759AbiKCNVz (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:21:55 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C8FB64EA; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 06:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56EEBB827CE; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 13:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08B94C433D7; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 13:21:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1667481712; bh=Z0XmaPzB8/5OxlKcz/hqxjFMPGgVEHY0wHqktG+DZyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QMJhet3iZ569LqI2RxhJ5QYzFlGVAz2fMhJvGFncZ9+TDlBN8IsBWwRbCsWNl62rV v3NXT0pBKTJ40xjG8hV4CrITh2ZH2vyuPJFFAFEtT1y3SE7/UfQjdHEZBDpdHOvhDt viiBZPXECITtsksc5raOEclCxfXcbZG0Q02CT79apotPc37nIMwQNOaUemfYUs4SoU FzDeUx9vYw/xVnY7VDJhWzvW2gumGTRAcOx1NqRphIXdFcfhXdmDKxCbdgbZs3MYDn ReUZ7bHw3NeZRPiXZtDR6y02Ri9IzqeyJR+N910XuYeIyn5DjS8qUZGTY8AfpDPU6c pGBWE0xPv4rVA== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1oqaA1-00082F-KI; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 14:21:34 +0100 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 14:21:33 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Baryshkov , Johan Hovold , Ulf Hansson , Taniya Das , Satya Priya , Douglas Anderson , Matthias Kaehlcke Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gdsc: Remove direct runtime PM calls Message-ID: References: <20221101233421.997149-1-swboyd@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 09:53:49AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Johan Hovold (2022-11-02 03:52:39) > > > Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov > > > Cc: Johan Hovold > > > Cc: Ulf Hansson > > > Cc: Taniya Das > > > Cc: Satya Priya > > > Cc: Douglas Anderson > > > Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke > > > Reported-by: Stephen Boyd > > > > We typically don't add Reported-by tags for bugs we find and fix > > ourselves. > > Heh, I didn't see anything like that in Documentation/ so it seems fine. > I debugged my problem and reported it. I'd say the documentation is pretty clear on this matter: Reported-by: names a user who reported a problem which is fixed by this patch; this tag is used to give credit to the (often underappreciated) people who test our code and let us know when things do not work correctly. - Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst The Reported-by tag gives credit to people who find bugs and report them and it hopefully inspires them to help us again in the future. Please note that if the bug was reported in private, then ask for permission first before using the Reported-by tag. - Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst Just like you don't add a Tested-by tag for every patch you submit, it is implied that you found the issue you fix unless you explicitly attribute that to a third party using Reported-by. This is the first time I see anyone trying to use Reported-by this way, and even if you think the documentation isn't clear enough on this, our praxis is. Johan