From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: add API to safely park RCG2 sources
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:36:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbJMnvg/IDwHNeWS@ripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211209083727.30DD2C004DD@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu 09 Dec 00:37 PST 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-12-07 18:22:09)
> > Some of RCG2 clocks can become stuck during the boot process, when
> > device drivers are enabling and disabling the RCG2's parent clocks.
> > To prevernt such outcome of driver probe sequences, add API to park
>
> s/prevernt/prevent/
>
> > clocks to the safe clock source (typically TCXO).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>
> I'd prefer this approach vs. adding a new clk flag. The clk framework
> doesn't handle handoff properly today so we shouldn't try to bandage
> that in the core.
>
I'm not against putting this responsibility in the drivers, but I don't
think we can blindly park all the RCGs that may or may not be used.
Note that we should do this for all RCGs that downstream are marked as
enable_safe_config (upstream should be using clk_rcg2_shared_ops)
and disabling some of those probe time won't be appreciated by the
hardware.
If you don't like the flag passed to clk_disable_unused (which is like a
very reasonable objection to have), we need to make progress towards a
proper solution that replaces clk_disable_unused().
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
> > index e1b1b426fae4..230b04a7427c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
> > @@ -1036,6 +1036,40 @@ static void clk_rcg2_shared_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > regmap_write(rcg->clkr.regmap, rcg->cmd_rcgr + CFG_REG, cfg);
> > }
> >
> > +int clk_rcg2_park_safely(struct regmap *regmap, u32 offset, unsigned int safe_src)
This seems to just duplicate clk_rcg2_shared_disable()?
Regards,
Bjorn
>
> Please add kernel doc as it's an exported symbol.
>
> > +{
> > + unsigned int val, ret, count;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(regmap, offset + CFG_REG, &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* assume safe source is 0 */
>
> Are we assuming safe source is 0 here? It looks like we pass it in now?
>
> > + if ((val & CFG_SRC_SEL_MASK) == (safe_src << CFG_SRC_SEL_SHIFT))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + regmap_write(regmap, offset + CFG_REG, safe_src << CFG_SRC_SEL_SHIFT);
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, offset + CMD_REG,
> > + CMD_UPDATE, CMD_UPDATE);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Wait for update to take effect */
> > + for (count = 500; count > 0; count--) {
> > + ret = regmap_read(regmap, offset + CMD_REG, &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (!(val & CMD_UPDATE))
> > + return 0;
> > + udelay(1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + WARN(1, "the rcg didn't update its configuration.");
>
> Add a newline?
>
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_rcg2_park_safely);
> > +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 2:22 [PATCH 0/2] clk: qcom: fix disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src issues on sdm845 Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 2:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: add API to safely park RCG2 sources Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-09 8:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-09 18:36 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2021-12-15 21:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-16 4:24 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-08 2:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: dispcc-sdm845: park disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-09 8:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-09 14:11 ` Robert Foss
2021-12-09 14:18 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-09 18:40 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-09 21:04 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-15 22:17 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-16 1:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-16 3:34 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-16 4:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-16 4:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbJMnvg/IDwHNeWS@ripper \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox