From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CE8C433EF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 14:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377055AbiFPOS1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 10:18:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56614 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1377668AbiFPOSZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 10:18:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F372252B3 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id z17so863639wmi.1 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:18:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UN5i/UKbtbONOs/WPjPNnPxxMDAl0vrQLK88lnS0mL4=; b=borFl+1dJOHpYvvyoUMMVCWKZHUKiB35x656cUgpGZgxyXRd6BlVe9MlysI1XLGXg2 LweQJzHCnssF4XbGeZNoo7DA+CeUxz2YtHDA+83oRpTfPLs2dA/VPk1VVJA3X64TdXPe hTV1eB97I8OWUdnKliftqc6oVC+j1VcKcay5espvSvYmdGbovu0ejbWlypNtvvg0iBta ouQgQqDzxPy284vv3evT54tmfbzR041f+jeU2c0UGA0TU0XfTeB59j9R4FCCF3RYXZfy t0V3hFxDqTShT5A/HEDkDrc3mIm7+Ltysddd2tYTaFoJrWVWQzIy1hhHn8paBqBwsa36 XE6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UN5i/UKbtbONOs/WPjPNnPxxMDAl0vrQLK88lnS0mL4=; b=0+BQTPx3B7j+d+YYm7CI++aoY61cHgnvnPX+B9HdNgz8L3pN2ZwiS8rfuRFarnx023 Wa1831tc2dI9oaDsEBojbEECXRAJgGkmlpVibMKP0xz5Lla00LeM4ZxRFTNGTDtn065K 0039DfHBVNEIHBSSiyloQQZmsKXAT0xT64I8Dc+pDDNq0CkSgmfudAuvtp4Vh1K1Jzz5 JmKruAVRYmOE7SBR79NdrQMX5zf4Zj5nyaNTvkI6Q9oUXDPr9ekDSuaRianDghizZ+dj sUWq3I1JkXgq0kLQX4sVxs8Ad35Pap0klkrpOZHkghTFuq9izTXSDeT8xWdo9ILL1OUo jDWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9F/Y7dLgDYM4M5Rfh/42Pe6hPfCEvnc6Oits3ZMl914i3NWzUZ AwjQCcoiV9Z5Xle/EEvphKs2Qw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1s5H8lKNZFdVa1S5zuMhAw0QUhD3qePq0J1JVU31PInsz4xDL9JKRXazszmikfRAVP5FcBYpA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1caa:b0:39c:49a4:2e34 with SMTP id k42-20020a05600c1caa00b0039c49a42e34mr5423762wms.82.1655389103112; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ryzen ([94.52.112.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t15-20020adfeb8f000000b0020e63ab5d78sm2055631wrn.26.2022.06.16.07.18.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:18:20 +0300 From: Abel Vesa To: Peng Fan Cc: Stephen Boyd , "Peng Fan (OSS)" , Abel Vesa , "mturquette@baylibre.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Jacky Bai Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] clk: imx93: Correct the edma1's parent clock Message-ID: References: <20220609132902.3504651-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> <20220609132902.3504651-4-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> <20220616001604.D4C3CC3411A@smtp.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On 22-06-16 03:58:10, Peng Fan wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] clk: imx93: Correct the edma1's parent clock > > > > Quoting Abel Vesa (2022-06-15 14:39:27) > > > On 22-06-09 21:28:58, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > > > From: Jacky Bai > > > > > > > > For EDMA1 in AONMIX, its parent clock should be from cm33_root, so > > > > Correct it. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 24defbe194b65("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk") > > > > Reviewed-by: Peng Fan > > > > > > The reviews done internally do no count in upstream. > > > I think that's the rule. So drop the R-b tags from all patches. > > > Keep only the S-o-b tags. > > > > Is it any different code from what is sent upstream here? If not any different > > then I don't think anything is stopping the review tags from being kept. > > There is no difference, I directly cherry-pick downstream patch to upstream, > with only a very minor subject change, dropping the JIRA ticket number. > Sounds good to me then. I'll apply it now. Thanks. > Thanks, > Peng.