From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FF3C433F5 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231172AbiJDJWx (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 05:22:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41314 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229797AbiJDJWO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 05:22:14 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9046FDECB; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 02:21:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1664875305; x=1696411305; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KSstq/GCDUme5uuX6zJ9Gh7FdRRSeg4CqrX1gghhPcA=; b=spwgZp1IdDixEYQY5EC9yHPIcjNl1hFJd3RLgRMCV7abnnDu0lmrn8ii bHGKRHIU2j6pzFVPWkXn89a/v3loSLBt+2xhDHzQF1ukarNLbGZNKZPn+ G/zU5PexK9nRsxx3K84Jrio+t1igUB4KKWvcbL11W9GQS/ZVTdaCfQ9Zj s8pHJi49gLh1wlEgZH09v181m/4hGqSTav/aQm3D9lNi//Kbsi7eKKxIf wwWjvBqhO2Z0iBj1EzaRdRRygrkTTzuPisbQ8WUxvj7eah3y7bhqNcEJ7 9SOWLiyFNdqLgpV1iZX2C9xiddC6JQ+J7JcdNbiBuMr3J0+9iQgWEw1kV g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,367,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="176914034" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 04 Oct 2022 02:21:44 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 02:21:43 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 02:21:40 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:21:18 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Linus Walleij CC: Rob Herring , Hal Feng , Rob Herring , Emil Renner Berthing , Philipp Zabel , , Albert Ou , Paul Walmsley , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , , , Michael Turquette , , , Stephen Boyd , Palmer Dabbelt , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 23/30] pinctrl: starfive: Rename "pinctrl-starfive" to "pinctrl-starfive-jh7100" Message-ID: References: <20220929143225.17907-1-hal.feng@linux.starfivetech.com> <20220930061404.5418-1-hal.feng@linux.starfivetech.com> <166457324093.1075476.18009315584754055366.robh@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:13:37AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:59 AM Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 10:48:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:28 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:14:04 +0800, Hal Feng wrote: > > > > > From: Jianlong Huang > > > > > > > > > > Add the SoC name to make it more clear. Also the next generation StarFive > > > > > SoCs will use "pinctrl-starfive" as the core of StarFive pinctrl driver. > > > > > No functional change. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianlong Huang > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hal Feng > > > > > --- > > > > > .../bindings/pinctrl/starfive,jh7100-pinctrl.yaml | 2 +- > > > > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7100-beaglev-starlight.dts | 2 +- > > > > > drivers/pinctrl/starfive/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > > > drivers/pinctrl/starfive/Makefile | 2 +- > > > > > .../{pinctrl-starfive.c => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.c} | 2 +- > > > > > .../{pinctrl-starfive.h => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.h} | 6 +++--- > > > > > 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > rename drivers/pinctrl/starfive/{pinctrl-starfive.c => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.c} (99%) > > > > > rename include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/{pinctrl-starfive.h => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.h} (98%) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > > > > > > > Would be good to pull this out separately and apply for 6.1. It's kind > > > > of messy with cross tree dependencies. > > > > > > OK I applied this for V6.1. > > > > Will this need to be done immutably so it can be pulled into the riscv > > tree in case this gets applied as a late change for 6.1: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/c5169131-486e-9808-ba48-b7abe1be6a99@collabora.com/ > > Always one finger on the fast-forward button have we? ;) Dunno what you mean by that mate, sorry! I just saw the mail wanted to have the decency to reply to that fellow & tell him to rebase after rc1 to avoid a conflict. > Rob's point was that I should apply this for v6.1 so that exactly > that kind of cross-dependencies and immutable branches could > be avoided for the v6.2 development cycle. > > The merge window is already open, it's a bit late for completely > new stuff I think. History suggests otherwise, but I'd be lying if I said I disagreed.