From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85175C6FD1D for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229917AbjCWLVH (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:21:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38132 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230010AbjCWLVH (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:21:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F651166F for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 04:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id eg48so84765779edb.13 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 04:21:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1679570464; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jDCC5ux4HmzsqYV/2lwqfpDI+o4eKtLbnQ/J7OyhDRE=; b=4jarIhY5HizTXMg3id+X3+WKjHlkaueY64bBwCuXRpk6b0k67ZqztZ19lBf47I8hog P357z8Pmo0vxE57iUrixvw30O/1UfVKwtOJFgwK7HyvCcgVJpr0PWRotQ2/JFnR3P7j6 L7KnSJVj3ezVUlJb23muMXtGPhpbBPQ4U4oFdY88vUVjVOtkX6RyYPvRQF32u4P3QzNe SAWO/RxV/zcNY6s9z3zs8l45Bmfoz6hCDBg2j3QKvkoRCQOFkTpRkaIUcWvBoFaIPAej S/dL5Y6Cgs/quCxWik6FQTljWktgztHlWruaT/Lcop5/9OQey6g16Slb11xyJ/d91dLa 05Pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679570464; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=jDCC5ux4HmzsqYV/2lwqfpDI+o4eKtLbnQ/J7OyhDRE=; b=pNepIoWoBGNkJh90pJUovKkH/AOCjpwSK0r6owUwvvvZtdeuC2PCUkVZn7ZdGks7Yx 7CKgDVTlxUx5TYs0aJCwzIbQ+wm+HPSLwaPaJm0d9Vvcl9xtLynGeXIDTZpDq4XEBJDX U5kxOIqCcB4YQLx+O5Z4OoNs8Lkk4NXnaMmqQ3fZStxOrfbvZQaaQ1Th6DMQ3E37UwCd Uy8seVWVSUdxhtmsXXTg+5e3wYOaKn9QNgAhXKj0DDzo1JkFVmsiISuufoCHC+GzEEJY omRy/4mu6Qpxm2ugIRaQxEfnuWsMKrEDbDyo2Sh9atmRqgVDothrrCnLkMB7OWUucmnx ENQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVmTD1z/oGku1wRi5so89g6xH4LDtLy3wsLal/U/YKDH6LtBRo8 CLJs3ph9yI40FJGF0yH6CiMcLg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9YUDnRnSj7cZIcYcBaBlW9jFPY1WXwdOUSIRCkccZjtBxm9cqS7ntDGFGywlgIASCSj/+nKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:694b:b0:878:7cf3:a9e7 with SMTP id c11-20020a170906694b00b008787cf3a9e7mr10555881ejs.65.1679570464600; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 04:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-213-179-129-39.customer.m-online.net. [213.179.129.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jx3-20020a170907760300b00930876176e2sm8554987ejc.29.2023.03.23.04.21.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 04:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:21:02 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: Vadim Fedorenko Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , Jonathan Lemon , Paolo Abeni , Vadim Fedorenko , poros@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v6 0/6] Create common DPLL/clock configuration API Message-ID: References: <20230312022807.278528-1-vadfed@meta.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230312022807.278528-1-vadfed@meta.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 03:28:01AM CET, vadfed@meta.com wrote: >Implement common API for clock/DPLL configuration and status reporting. >The API utilises netlink interface as transport for commands and event >notifications. This API aim to extend current pin configuration and >make it flexible and easy to cover special configurations. > >v5 -> v6: > * rework pin part to better fit shared pins use cases > * add YAML spec to easy generate user-space apps > * simple implementation in ptp_ocp is back again Vadim, Arkadiusz. I have couple of patches on top of this one and mlx5 implementation. I would like to send it to you until Sunday. Could you include those to the next rfc? I will not review this version more now. Lets do the changes, I will continue with the review on the next version of rfc. Thanks!