From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Of clk_hw_unregister_fractional_divider
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 00:58:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwcmrWgoClYI2nUq@gallifrey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27ac7ba804d260ca9e1397a17b9e8696.sboyd@kernel.org>
* Stephen Boyd (sboyd@kernel.org) wrote:
> Quoting Dr. David Alan Gilbert (2024-10-08 17:54:24)
> > Hi,
> > One of my scripts noticed that clk_hw_unregister_fractional_divider
> > was unused and I was thinking of dead coding it, but thought it worth
> > asking whether it's actually a missing call to it.
> >
> > It was added in 2016 by:
> >
> > commit 39b44cff4ad4af6d7abd9dd2acb288b005c26503
> > Author: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Date: Sun Feb 7 00:15:09 2016 -0800
> >
> > clk: fractional-divider: Add hw based registration APIs
> >
> > and I can see clk_hw_register_fractional_divider is called from
> > clk_register_fractional_divider.
> >
> > Is that just consequence of them being system devices that never
> > get unregistered or something else?
> >
>
> I don't know what you mean by system devices.
I mean something that can't get unplugged/removed.
> The clk_hw prefixed functions and clk_hw based APIs should be used
> instead of struct clk APIs for clk providers in general. I'd accept a
> patch that migrates the two calls to clk_register_fractional_divider()
> with a call to clk_hw_register_fractional_divider() instead. If that's
> done we can remove clk_register_fractional_divider(), which is the
> overall plan but nobody got around to it so far.
Oh hmm, that doesn't look too hard for those two - although I'm not sure
I have a way of testing it?
However, my question was about the clk_hw_*un*register_fractional_divider
- I can see the clk_register_fractional_divider can be replaced by
clk_hw_register_fractional_divider - but would there need to be
a call to the unregister somewhere? (Which is what my script noticed
there's no callers of).
Dave
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 0:54 Of clk_hw_unregister_fractional_divider Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-10-09 20:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-10-10 0:58 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2024-10-10 1:23 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwcmrWgoClYI2nUq@gallifrey \
--to=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox