linux-clk.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: Use hashtable for global clk lookups
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 09:20:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKhutc0IVWun83qF@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814035317.4112336-2-wenst@chromium.org>

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 11:53:16AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> A clk lookup using clk_core_lookup() is currently somewhat expensive
> since it has to walk the whole clk tree to find a match. This is
> extremely bad in the clk_core_init() function where it is used to look
> for clk name conflicts, which is always the worst case of walking the
> whole tree. Moreover, the number of clks checked increases as more
> clks are registered, causing each subsequent clk registration becoming
> slower.
> 
> Add a hashtable for doing clk lookups to replace the tree walk method.
> On arm64 this increases kernel memory usage by 4 KB for the hashtable,
> and 16 bytes (2 pointers) for |struct hlist_node| in each clk. On a
> platform with around 800 clks, this reduces the time spent in
> clk_core_lookup() significantly:
> 
>           |      PID 0      |     kworker     |
>           | before |  after | before |  after |
>     -------------------------------------------
>     avg   | 203 us | 2.7 us | 123 us | 1.5 us |
>     -------------------------------------------
>     min   | 4.7 us | 2.3 us | 102 us | 0.9 us |
>     -------------------------------------------
>     max   | 867 us | 4.8 us | 237 us | 3.5 us |
>     -------------------------------------------
>     culm  | 109 ms | 1.5 ms |  21 ms | 0.3 ms |
> 
> This in turn reduces the time spent in clk_hw_register(), and
> ultimately, boot time. On a different system with close to 700 clks,
> This reduces boot time by around 110 ms. While this doesn't seem like
> a lot, this helps in cases where minimizing boot time is important.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>

I tested this on my Thinkpad x13s laptop, and clk_core_lookup() is
called 684 times on normal boot up of my system. Only 4 of those are
duplicate lookups.

Brian


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-22 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-14  3:53 [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: Sort include statements Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-08-14  3:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: Use hashtable for global clk lookups Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-08-22 13:20   ` Brian Masney [this message]
2025-08-22 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: Sort include statements Brian Masney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKhutc0IVWun83qF@x1 \
    --to=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).