public inbox for linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
	Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>,
	Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>,
	Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@gmail.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] clk: starfive: Add system-0 domain PLL clock driver
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 12:10:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac_mdhEl9VtpTuw8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403054945.467700-4-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>

Hi Changhuang,

On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 10:49:35PM -0700, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> Add system-0 domain PLL clock driver for StarFive JHB100 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig                  |   8 +
>  drivers/clk/starfive/Makefile                 |   1 +
>  .../clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jhb100-pll.c    | 498 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 507 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jhb100-pll.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig
> index c612f1ede7d7..cc712da68bd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig
> @@ -105,6 +105,14 @@ config CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_PER3
>  	  Say yes here to support the peripheral-3 clock controller
>  	  on the StarFive JHB100 SoC.
>  
> +config CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_PLL
> +	bool "StarFive JHB100 PLL clock support"
> +	depends on ARCH_STARFIVE || COMPILE_TEST
> +	default ARCH_STARFIVE
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support the PLL clock controller on the
> +	  StarFive JHB100 SoC.
> +
>  config CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_SYS0
>  	bool "StarFive JHB100 system-0 clock support"
>  	depends on ARCH_STARFIVE || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/starfive/Makefile b/drivers/clk/starfive/Makefile
> index f00690f0cdad..547a8c170728 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/starfive/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/starfive/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_PER0)		+= clk-starfive-jhb100-per0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_PER1)		+= clk-starfive-jhb100-per1.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_PER2)		+= clk-starfive-jhb100-per2.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_PER3)		+= clk-starfive-jhb100-per3.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_PLL)		+= clk-starfive-jhb100-pll.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_SYS0)		+= clk-starfive-jhb100-sys0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_SYS1)		+= clk-starfive-jhb100-sys1.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_STARFIVE_JHB100_SYS2)		+= clk-starfive-jhb100-sys2.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jhb100-pll.c b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jhb100-pll.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1751a734ee83
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jhb100-pll.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,498 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * StarFive JHB100 PLL Clock Generator Driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 StarFive Technology Co., Ltd.
> + *
> + * Author: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/starfive,jhb100-crg.h>
> +
> +/* this driver expects a 25MHz input frequency from the oscillator */
> +#define JHB100_PLL_OSC_RATE		25000000UL

You could include linux/units.h and then use: 25 * HZ_PER_MHZ

> +
> +/* System-0 domain PLL */
> +#define JHB100_PLL2_OFFSET		0x00
> +#define JHB100_PLL3_OFFSET		0x0c
> +#define JHB100_PLL4_OFFSET		0x18
> +#define JHB100_PLL5_OFFSET		0x24
> +
> +#define JHB100_PLL_CFG0_OFFSET		0x0
> +#define JHB100_PLL_CFG1_OFFSET		0x4
> +#define JHB100_PLL_CFG2_OFFSET		0x8
> +
> +#define JHB100_PLLX_CFG0(offset)	((offset) + JHB100_PLL_CFG0_OFFSET)
> +/* fbdiv value should be 16 to 4095 */
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_FBDIV			GENMASK(13, 2)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_FBDIV_SHIFT		2
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_EN		BIT(14)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_EN_SHIFT	14
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_FOUTVCOP_EN		BIT(16)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_FOUTVCOP_EN_SHIFT		16
> +
> +#define JHB100_PLLX_CFG1(offset)	((offset) + JHB100_PLL_CFG1_OFFSET)
> +/* frac value should be decimals multiplied by 2^24 */
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_FRAC			GENMASK(23, 0)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_FRAC_SHIFT			0
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_LOCK			BIT(24)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_LOCK_SHIFT			24
> +
> +#define JHB100_PLLX_CFG2(offset)	((offset) + JHB100_PLL_CFG2_OFFSET)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_PD				BIT(13)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_PD_SHIFT			13
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_POSTDIV			GENMASK(15, 14)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_POSTDIV_SHIFT		14
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_REFDIV			GENMASK(23, 18)
> +#define   JHB100_PLL_REFDIV_SHIFT		18
> +
> +#define JHB100_PLL_TIMEOUT_US		1000
> +#define JHB100_PLL_INTERVAL_US		100
> +
> +struct jhb100_pll_preset {
> +	unsigned long freq;
> +	u32 frac;			/* frac value should be decimals multiplied by 2^24 */
> +	unsigned fbdiv		: 12;	/* fbdiv value should be 8 to 4095 */
> +	unsigned refdiv		: 6;
> +	unsigned postdiv	: 2;
> +	unsigned foutpostdiv_en	: 1;
> +	unsigned foutvcop_en	: 1;
> +};
> +
> +struct jhb100_pll_info {
> +	char *name;
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_preset *presets;
> +	unsigned int npresets;
> +	unsigned long flag;
> +	u8 offset;
> +	bool continuous;
> +};
> +
> +#define _JHB100_PLL(_idx, _name, _presets, _npresets, _offset, _flag, _cont)	\
> +	[_idx] = {							\
> +		.name = _name,						\
> +		.offset = _offset,					\
> +		.presets = _presets,					\
> +		.npresets = _npresets,					\
> +		.flag = _flag,						\
> +		.continuous = _cont,					\
> +	}
> +
> +#define JHB100_PLL(idx, name, presets, npresets, offset, cont)			\
> +	_JHB100_PLL(idx, name, presets, npresets, offset, 0, cont)
> +
> +struct jhb100_pll_match_data {
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_info *pll_info;
> +	int num_pll;
> +};
> +
> +struct jhb100_pll_data {
> +	struct clk_hw hw;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +};
> +
> +struct jhb100_pll_priv {
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_match_data *match_data;
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data pll[];
> +};
> +
> +struct jhb100_pll_regvals {
> +	u32 fbdiv;
> +	u32 frac;
> +	u32 postdiv;
> +	u32 refdiv;
> +	bool foutpostdiv_en;
> +	bool foutvcop_en;
> +};
> +
> +static struct jhb100_pll_data *jhb100_pll_data_from(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	return container_of(hw, struct jhb100_pll_data, hw);
> +}
> +
> +static struct jhb100_pll_priv *jhb100_pll_priv_from(struct jhb100_pll_data *pll)
> +{
> +	return container_of(pll, struct jhb100_pll_priv, pll[pll->idx]);
> +}
> +
> +static int jhb100_pll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = jhb100_pll_data_from(hw);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = jhb100_pll_priv_from(pll);
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_info *info = &priv->match_data->pll_info[pll->idx];
> +
> +	regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG2(info->offset),
> +			   JHB100_PLL_PD, 0);

Should the return value be checked here? Or just:

    return regumap_update_bits(...);

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void jhb100_pll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = jhb100_pll_data_from(hw);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = jhb100_pll_priv_from(pll);
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_info *info = &priv->match_data->pll_info[pll->idx];
> +
> +	regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG2(info->offset),
> +			   JHB100_PLL_PD, BIT(JHB100_PLL_PD_SHIFT));
> +}
> +
> +static int jhb100_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = jhb100_pll_data_from(hw);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = jhb100_pll_priv_from(pll);
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_info *info = &priv->match_data->pll_info[pll->idx];
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	regmap_read(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG2(info->offset), &val);

Should the return value be checked?

> +
> +	return !(val & JHB100_PLL_PD);

If regmap_read() returns an error, then is val uninitialized?

> +}
> +
> +static void jhb100_pll_regvals_get(struct regmap *regmap,
> +				   const struct jhb100_pll_info *info,
> +				   struct jhb100_pll_regvals *ret)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	regmap_read(regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG0(info->offset), &val);
> +	ret->fbdiv = (val & JHB100_PLL_FBDIV) >> JHB100_PLL_FBDIV_SHIFT;
> +	ret->foutpostdiv_en = !!((val & JHB100_PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_EN) >>
> +				 JHB100_PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_EN_SHIFT);
> +	ret->foutvcop_en = !!((val & JHB100_PLL_FOUTVCOP_EN) >>
> +			      JHB100_PLL_FOUTVCOP_EN_SHIFT);
> +
> +	regmap_read(regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG1(info->offset), &val);
> +	ret->frac = (val & JHB100_PLL_FRAC) >> JHB100_PLL_FRAC_SHIFT;
> +
> +	regmap_read(regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG2(info->offset), &val);
> +	ret->postdiv = (val & JHB100_PLL_POSTDIV) >> JHB100_PLL_POSTDIV_SHIFT;
> +	ret->refdiv = (val & JHB100_PLL_REFDIV) >> JHB100_PLL_REFDIV_SHIFT;

Should these regmap return values be checked, and the error code returned?

> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long jhb100_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = jhb100_pll_data_from(hw);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = jhb100_pll_priv_from(pll);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_regvals val;
> +	unsigned long rate;
> +	u32 power = 0;
> +
> +	jhb100_pll_regvals_get(priv->regmap, &priv->match_data->pll_info[pll->idx], &val);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 *
> +	 * if (foutvcop_en)
> +	 *      rate = parent * (fbdiv + frac / 2^24) / refdiv
> +	 *
> +	 * if (foutpostdiv_en)
> +	 *      rate = parent * (fbdiv + frac / 2^24) / refdiv / 2^(postdiv + 1)
> +	 *
> +	 * parent * (fbdiv + frac / 2^24) = parent * fbdiv + parent * frac / 2^24
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (!!val.foutvcop_en == !!val.foutpostdiv_en)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	rate = (parent_rate * val.frac) >> 24;
> +
> +	if (val.foutpostdiv_en)
> +		power = val.postdiv + 1;
> +
> +	rate += parent_rate * val.fbdiv;
> +	rate /= val.refdiv << power;

Could val.refdiv ever be zero?

> +
> +	return rate;
> +}
> +
> +static int jhb100_pll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = jhb100_pll_data_from(hw);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = jhb100_pll_priv_from(pll);
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_info *info = &priv->match_data->pll_info[pll->idx];
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_preset *selected = &info->presets[0];
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +
> +	/* if the parent rate doesn't match our expectations the presets won't work */
> +	if (req->best_parent_rate != JHB100_PLL_OSC_RATE) {
> +		req->rate = jhb100_pll_recalc_rate(hw, req->best_parent_rate);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* continuous means support any rate */
> +	if (info->continuous)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* find highest rate lower or equal to the requested rate */
> +	for (idx = 1; idx < info->npresets; idx++) {
> +		const struct jhb100_pll_preset *val = &info->presets[idx];
> +
> +		if (req->rate < val->freq)
> +			break;
> +
> +		selected = val;
> +	}
> +
> +	req->rate = selected->freq;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int jhb100_pll_set_preset(struct clk_hw *hw, struct jhb100_pll_preset *val)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = jhb100_pll_data_from(hw);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = jhb100_pll_priv_from(pll);
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_info *info = &priv->match_data->pll_info[pll->idx];
> +	unsigned int value;
> +
> +	regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG0(info->offset), JHB100_PLL_FBDIV,
> +			   (u32)val->fbdiv << JHB100_PLL_FBDIV_SHIFT);
> +	regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG0(info->offset), JHB100_PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_EN,
> +			   (u32)val->foutpostdiv_en << JHB100_PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_EN_SHIFT);
> +	regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG0(info->offset), JHB100_PLL_FOUTVCOP_EN,
> +			   (u32)val->foutvcop_en << JHB100_PLL_FOUTVCOP_EN_SHIFT);

These are writing to the same register. Should the values be combined
into one, and written once to the register?

> +	regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG1(info->offset), JHB100_PLL_FRAC,
> +			   val->frac << JHB100_PLL_FRAC_SHIFT);
> +	regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG2(info->offset), JHB100_PLL_REFDIV,
> +			   (u32)val->refdiv << JHB100_PLL_REFDIV_SHIFT);
> +	regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG2(info->offset), JHB100_PLL_POSTDIV,
> +			   (u32)val->postdiv << JHB100_PLL_POSTDIV_SHIFT);

The last two calls to JHB100_PLLX_CFG2 also write to the same register.
Should the two writes be combined into one?

Should the return values from regmap_update_bits() be checked?

> +
> +	/* waiting for PLL to lock */
> +	return regmap_read_poll_timeout_atomic(priv->regmap, JHB100_PLLX_CFG1(info->offset),
> +					       value, value & JHB100_PLL_LOCK,
> +					       JHB100_PLL_INTERVAL_US,
> +					       JHB100_PLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> +}
> +
> +static int jhb100_pll_rate_to_preset(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +				     unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_preset val = {
> +		.refdiv = 1,
> +		.postdiv = 3,
> +		.foutpostdiv_en = 1,
> +		.foutvcop_en = 0,
> +	};
> +	unsigned int power = 0;
> +	unsigned long fbdiv_24, t;
> +
> +	if (val.foutpostdiv_en)
> +		power = val.postdiv + 1;
> +
> +	t = val.refdiv << power;
> +	t *= rate;
> +
> +	val.fbdiv = t / parent_rate;

Should a check for parent_rate == 0 be added?

> +
> +	fbdiv_24 = (t << 24) / parent_rate;
> +	val.frac = fbdiv_24 - (val.fbdiv << 24);
> +
> +	return jhb100_pll_set_preset(hw, &val);
> +}
> +
> +static int jhb100_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +			       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = jhb100_pll_data_from(hw);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = jhb100_pll_priv_from(pll);
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_info *info = &priv->match_data->pll_info[pll->idx];
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_preset *val;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +
> +	/* if the parent rate doesn't match our expectations the presets won't work */
> +	if (parent_rate != JHB100_PLL_OSC_RATE)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (info->continuous)
> +		return jhb100_pll_rate_to_preset(hw, rate, parent_rate);
> +
> +	for (idx = 0, val = &info->presets[0]; idx < info->npresets; idx++, val++) {
> +		if (val->freq == rate)
> +			return jhb100_pll_set_preset(hw, (struct jhb100_pll_preset *)val);

The cast looks to be here because of the const in
jhb100_pll_set_preset(). Can const be added to the declaration of
jhb100_pll_set_preset()?

> +	}
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> +static int jhb100_pll_registers_read(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = s->private;
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = jhb100_pll_priv_from(pll);
> +	struct jhb100_pll_regvals val;
> +
> +	jhb100_pll_regvals_get(priv->regmap, &priv->match_data->pll_info[pll->idx], &val);
> +
> +	seq_printf(s, "fbdiv=%u\n"
> +		      "frac=%u\n"
> +		      "refdiv=%u\n"
> +		      "postdiv=%u\n"
> +		      "foutpostdiv_en=%u\n"
> +		      "foutvcop_en=%u\n",
> +		      val.fbdiv, val.frac, val.refdiv, val.postdiv,
> +		      val.foutpostdiv_en, val.foutvcop_en);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int jhb100_pll_registers_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
> +{
> +	return single_open(f, jhb100_pll_registers_read, inode->i_private);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations jhb100_pll_registers_ops = {
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	.open = jhb100_pll_registers_open,
> +	.release = single_release,
> +	.read = seq_read,
> +	.llseek = seq_lseek
> +};
> +
> +static void jhb100_pll_debug_init(struct clk_hw *hw, struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = jhb100_pll_data_from(hw);
> +
> +	debugfs_create_file("registers", 0400, dentry, pll,
> +			    &jhb100_pll_registers_ops);
> +}
> +#else
> +#define jhb100_pll_debug_init NULL
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops jhb100_pll_ops = {
> +	.enable = jhb100_pll_enable,
> +	.disable = jhb100_pll_disable,
> +	.is_enabled = jhb100_pll_is_enabled,
> +	.recalc_rate = jhb100_pll_recalc_rate,
> +	.determine_rate = jhb100_pll_determine_rate,
> +	.set_rate = jhb100_pll_set_rate,
> +	.debug_init = jhb100_pll_debug_init,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *jhb100_pll_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv = data;
> +	unsigned int idx = clkspec->args[0];
> +
> +	if (idx < priv->match_data->num_pll)
> +		return &priv->pll[idx].hw;
> +
> +	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init jhb100_pll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	const struct jhb100_pll_match_data *match_data;
> +	struct jhb100_pll_priv *priv;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	match_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!match_data)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> +			    struct_size(priv, pll, match_data->num_pll),
> +			    GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	priv->match_data = match_data;
> +	priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	priv->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(priv->dev->of_node->parent);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->regmap);
> +
> +	for (idx = 0; idx < match_data->num_pll; idx++) {
> +		struct clk_parent_data parents = {
> +			.index = 0,
> +		};
> +		struct clk_init_data init = {
> +			.name = match_data->pll_info[idx].name,
> +			.ops = &jhb100_pll_ops,
> +			.parent_data = &parents,
> +			.num_parents = 1,
> +			.flags = match_data->pll_info[idx].flag,
> +		};
> +		struct jhb100_pll_data *pll = &priv->pll[idx];
> +
> +		pll->hw.init = &init;
> +		pll->idx = idx;
> +
> +		ret = devm_clk_hw_register(&pdev->dev, &pll->hw);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(&pdev->dev, jhb100_pll_get, priv);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct jhb100_pll_preset jhb100_pll2_presets[] = {
> +	{
> +		.freq = 903168000,
> +		.fbdiv = 72,
> +		.frac = 4252017,
> +		.refdiv = 1,
> +		.postdiv = 0,
> +		.foutpostdiv_en = 1,
> +		.foutvcop_en = 0,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct jhb100_pll_preset jhb100_pll3_presets[] = {
> +	{
> +		.freq = 800000000,
> +		.fbdiv = 64,
> +		.frac = 0,
> +		.refdiv = 1,
> +		.postdiv = 0,
> +		.foutpostdiv_en = 1,
> +		.foutvcop_en = 0,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct jhb100_pll_info jhb100_sys0_pll_info[] = {
> +	JHB100_PLL(JHB100_SYS0PLL_PLL2_OUT, "pll2_out", jhb100_pll2_presets,
> +		   ARRAY_SIZE(jhb100_pll2_presets), JHB100_PLL2_OFFSET, false),
> +	_JHB100_PLL(JHB100_SYS0PLL_PLL3_OUT, "pll3_out", jhb100_pll3_presets,
> +		    ARRAY_SIZE(jhb100_pll3_presets), JHB100_PLL3_OFFSET,
> +		    CLK_IS_CRITICAL, false),
> +	_JHB100_PLL(JHB100_SYS0PLL_PLL4_OUT, "pll4_out", NULL, 0,
> +		    JHB100_PLL4_OFFSET, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, true),
> +	_JHB100_PLL(JHB100_SYS0PLL_PLL5_OUT, "pll5_out", NULL, 0,
> +		    JHB100_PLL5_OFFSET, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, true),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct jhb100_pll_match_data jhb100_sys0_pll = {
> +	.pll_info = jhb100_sys0_pll_info,
> +	.num_pll = ARRAY_SIZE(jhb100_sys0_pll_info),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id jhb100_pll_match[] = {
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "starfive,jhb100-sys0-pll",
> +		.data = (void *)&jhb100_sys0_pll,

The (void *) cast shouldn't be needed.

> +	}, {

Put { on it's own newline.

Brian


> +		/* sentinel */
> +	}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, jhb100_pll_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver jhb100_pll_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "clk-starfive-jhb100-pll",
> +		.of_match_table = jhb100_pll_match,
> +	},
> +};
> +builtin_platform_driver_probe(jhb100_pll_driver, jhb100_pll_probe);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-03 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-03  5:49 [PATCH v1 00/13] Add StarFive JHB100 syscon modules Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] dt-bindings: soc: starfive: " Changhuang Liang
2026-04-05  7:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] dt-bindings: clock: Add system-0 domain PLL clock Changhuang Liang
2026-04-05  7:18   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] clk: starfive: Add system-0 domain PLL clock driver Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03 16:10   ` Brian Masney [this message]
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] dt-bindings: clock: Add peripheral-0 domain PLL clock Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] clk: starfive: Add peripheral-0 domain PLL clock driver Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] dt-bindings: clock: Add peripheral-1 domain PLL clock Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] clk: starfive: Add Peripheral-1 domain PLL clock driver Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] dt-bindings: reset: Add StarFive JHB100 reset generator Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] reset: starfive: Introduce assert_polarity Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] reset: starfive: Add syscon reset driver support Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] dt-bindings: hwinfo: Add starfive,jhb100-socinfo Changhuang Liang
2026-04-05  7:19   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] soc: starfive: Add socinfo driver for JHB100 SoC Changhuang Liang
2026-04-03  5:49 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] riscv: dts: starfive: jhb100: Add syscon nodes Changhuang Liang
2026-04-05  7:18 ` [PATCH v1 00/13] Add StarFive JHB100 syscon modules Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac_mdhEl9VtpTuw8@redhat.com \
    --to=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=alchark@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=inochiama@gmail.com \
    --cc=keguang.zhang@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=unicorn_wang@outlook.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox