From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F21A5465B; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 02:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712630095; cv=none; b=a6gW8ksQlhZLtxp7YL4NuIQm5yKIhGjE02/RinoSuKKhGq6lSsuArUrTD9ZZlLKIbwm2G2F7VQ5c4ASbyZ8jXD1vcc4yxhy+V+m/rkfePQAIKL2Wtk1wh/EMwGYn5xN/keb1a16e97ueXbxGQq9MUDR34OToSlelAk0bwyYVXYQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712630095; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Seu7MEseXAofsiFG8utdZXOywqzS1EPCJzsIpTnAYMg=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=mSDPTzUxNrj1ZS+yjBuomJCp7efEC94ADRTtuhVaL1SzPNgnE5NegWRVFb+aPo7qgLAIxesHApkXbiGAxvlV5VHYT0/lEFDcf+wQzSyO0ycayvP0y6SqjU4DVEgBx6iUamllw+Pfm0jH0NwrIuUi6kRUF4Y5XoD8+49mowXV49U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qfDuqMsE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qfDuqMsE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9F7CC433F1; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 02:34:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712630094; bh=Seu7MEseXAofsiFG8utdZXOywqzS1EPCJzsIpTnAYMg=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=qfDuqMsENwFasEEnQB3DM2C76irjmQ9u3yD02di/koRT29NkVGW0DrAzVF5FuloQu IOcqkQSQZP3m5mu2nfuNzP6225SWvoa5ioYYi3jS/Oq20FtZSuiJIPKjxvv10uEPCd lCRja8XT8J28ZCzqGNynuRprPLInP5rZ1uGhtOsz8hQH7h4J7myjoZNrQ1fs7RJFXW fIxFY+oIvqpXQjVP8TtUpkt27CWkTYGIdVX4hmEgpgknFUB//1ONgXgTwQXcGKjkt5 YZg0SWUhPU81YCe+ygmq8hVc4TMKxYxN+gHK3jypgjEw644u6IEEvudLcf+IEsk8l/ deWqc/hlqB74A== Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20240408-dispcc-dp-clocks-v1-1-f9e44902c28d@linaro.org> References: <20240408-dispcc-dp-clocks-v1-0-f9e44902c28d@linaro.org> <20240408-dispcc-dp-clocks-v1-1-f9e44902c28d@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8450: fix DisplayPort clocks From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Andersson , Dmitry Baryshkov , Konrad Dybcio , Konrad Dybcio , Michael Turquette , Neil Armstrong Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 19:34:52 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2024-04-08 04:47:04) > On SM8450 DisplayPort link clocks use frequency tables inherited from > the vendor kernel, it is not applicable in the upstream kernel. Drop > frequency tables and use clk_byte2_ops for those clocks. The subject says "fix", but does this fix anything, or simply optimize? Is something broken by having the frequency table?