Hi Vladimir,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 04:00:46PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> commenting the series I was also directed by Konrad's review comment on it.
> In addition one problem, which I immediate observe, is that camcc_sc8280xp_desc
> misses the necessary .use_rpm flag, can you please do me a favour and test
> my series plus the add-on change below?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8280xp.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8280xp.c
> index 18f5a3eb313e..a15e9754bfb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8280xp.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8280xp.c
> @@ -2995,6 +2995,8 @@ static const struct qcom_cc_desc camcc_sc8280xp_desc = {
>  	.num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(camcc_sc8280xp_resets),
>  	.gdscs = camcc_sc8280xp_gdscs,
>  	.num_gdscs = ARRAY_SIZE(camcc_sc8280xp_gdscs),
> +	.use_rpm = true,
> +	.cc_gdsc = &titan_top_gdsc,
>  };
>  static const struct of_device_id camcc_sc8280xp_match_table[] = {

I tried with this initially, however it fails with:

[    8.193803] camcc-sc8280xp ad00000.clock-controller: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!

I see that pm_runtime_enable() is called from common.c when use_rpm is
enabled. So I removed all of that from camcc-sc8280xp.c with the
attached patch.

It still fails with:

[    8.204595] camcc-sc8280xp ad00000.clock-controller: probe with driver camcc-sc8280xp failed with error -22

I suspect the use_rpm flag requires a more thorough migration.

Brian