Re: [PATCH v1] clk: qcom: Drop inclusions of <linux/mod_devicetable.h>

[Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 09:55:23PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 03:15:55PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 08:21:05PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote:
> > > The only used symbol in these four drivers that is provided by
> > > <linux/mod_devicetable.h> is of_device_id and this is also provided by
> > > <linux/platform_device.h>.
> > 
> > I don't see it defined in platform_device, unless I am missing
> > something?
> > 
> > It looks like the reason this compiles is because of this chain of
> > includes:
> > 
> > linux/clk-provider.h -> linux/of.h -> linux/device-id/of.h
> 
> Well, the chain for <linux/platform_device.h> is:
> 
> 	   <linux/platform_device.h>
> 	-> <linux/device.h>
> 	-> <linux/device/driver.h>
> 	-> <linux/device-id/of.h>
> 
> but the more relevant thing is: <linux/platform_device.h> makes use of
> struct of_device_id and most consumer of that header (typically platform
> drivers) need struct of_device_id. So it's very sensible that
> <linux/platform_device.h> is enough to get that definition. The include
> chain is just an implementation detail.
>  
> > > So drop the unneeded include which brings us
> > > one step closer to removing <linux/mod_devicetable.h>.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> > 
> > With an updated commit message:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
> 
> Does this discussion convince you that the commit log is ok as is?

Yes, agreed. Thanks for the clarification.

Brian