From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
To: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Cc: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>,
bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com, mukesh.savaliya@oss.qualcomm.com,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chandana.chiluveru@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Guard clk_round_rate() against error pointers
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:40:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amPY3TNEFwtlpzWw@venus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amOId3MHkryiFwC1@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4506 bytes --]
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:44:55AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 10:10:06PM +0530, Praveen Talari wrote:
> > On 23-07-2026 19:59, Brian Masney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:40:47AM +0530, Praveen Talari wrote:
> > > > clk_round_rate() only checks for a NULL clk pointer before
> > > > dereferencing it, but callers such as dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can pass
> > > > it an error pointer (e.g. ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) left behind by
> > > > clk_get() when a device has no Linux clock and is instead managed by
> > > > firmware via a genpd/OPP performance domain).
> > > >
> > > > Dereferencing that error pointer to read clk->exclusive_count
> > > > crashes with an unhandled kernel NULL pointer dereference, since
> > > > ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) plus the field's offset lands on a small, unmapped
> > > > address:
> > > >
> > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> > > > address 000000000000002e
> > > > ...
> > > > pc : clk_round_rate+0x3c/0x188
> > > > ...
> > > > Call trace:
> > > > clk_round_rate+0x3c/0x188 (P)
> > > > dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0x114/0x33c
> > > >
> > > > Change the guard from "if (!clk)" to "if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))",
> > > > matching the pattern already used by other clk consumer API
> > > > functions such as clk_unprepare(), so an error pointer is rejected
> > > > the same way a NULL pointer is.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > index 048adfa86a5d..8c1ad3d10284 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> > > > struct clk_rate_request req;
> > > > int ret;
> > > > - if (!clk)
> > > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))
> > > Can you provide more details about the clk_get() call point that starts this
> > > error? Specifically which driver this occurs in and the exact scenario that
> > > triggers this.
> >
> > On SA8255P platform there is no Linux
> > clock for the SE, and the perf domain device's OPPs are populated entirely
> > from firmware via devm_pm_opp_of_add_table() (through
> > of_genpd_add_provider_simple()/onecell()), so the perf domain's OPP table
> > has entries even though no clk_get() ever succeeds for it.
> >
> > The clk_get(-ENOENT) case comes from _update_opp_table_clk() in
> > drivers/opp/core.c:
> >
> > opp_table->clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(opp_table->clk);
> > ...
> > if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> > /* ... no clk provided ... */
> > opp_table->clk_count = 1;
> > return opp_table; /* opp_table->clk left as ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) */
> > }
> >
> > Because the perf domain device has no "clocks" property (its OPPs are
> > supplied purely as performance states by firmware/genpd), clk_get()
> > returns -ENOENT, and opp_table->clk is left holding that error pointer
> > rather than being reset to NULL.
>
> This looks to be a reasonable change. Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
I suggest to instead change the OPP code, so that it calls
clk_get_optional() instead of clk_get() and thus properly
"document" that the clock is optional and use the NULL dummy
clock (it's also shorter):
/*
* There are few platforms which don't want the OPP core to
* manage device's clock settings. In such cases neither the
* platform provides the clks explicitly to us, nor the DT
* contains a valid clk entry. The OPP nodes in DT may still
* contain "opp-hz" property though, which we need to parse and
* allow the platform to find an OPP based on freq later on.
*
* This is a simple solution to take care of such corner cases,
* i.e. make the clk_count 1, which lets us allocate space for
* frequency in opp->rates and also parse the entries in DT.
*/
opp_table->clk = clk_get_optional(dev, NULL);
ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(opp_table->clk);
if (ret) {
dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table);
dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Couldn't find clock\n");
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
if (opp_table->clk)
opp_table->config_clks = _opp_config_clk_single;
opp_table->clk_count = 1;
return opp_table;
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260723-fix_ptr_check_on_clk-v1-1-568a7ed87746@oss.qualcomm.com>
2026-07-23 14:29 ` [PATCH] clk: Guard clk_round_rate() against error pointers Brian Masney
2026-07-23 16:40 ` Praveen Talari
2026-07-24 15:44 ` Brian Masney
2026-07-24 21:40 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amPY3TNEFwtlpzWw@venus \
--to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=chandana.chiluveru@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=mukesh.savaliya@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox