From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Ryan Wanner <ryan.wanner@microchip.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Brian Masney <bmasney+clk@redhat.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com>,
Mihai Sain <mihai.sain@microchip.com>,
Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@microchip.com>,
Durai Manickam KR <durai.manickamkr@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] clk: at91: Use new per SoC PMC clock index definitions
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 16:29:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c05aefdc-7b60-472b-ae08-2c3af3cd533f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105110715.2486432-5-ada@thorsis.com>
On 11/5/26 13:06, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Adding missing clocks for only some (more recent) SoCs got more and more
> complex and confusing with the old common definitions, while there was
> no actual need to have them common.
>
> A splitup of the definitions in the bindings was prosoded and done per
> SoC, before adding new array members for missing clocks.
>
> Switch from the old common indexes to the new per SoC indexes.
> No functional change. Old defines can be removed later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl<ada@thorsis.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 11:06 [PATCH v4 00/16] Microchip OTPC driver on SAM9X60 exposing UIDxR as additional nvmem device Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] MAINTAINERS: Add sam9/sama to (AT91) SoC support Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] dt-bindings: clock: at91: Split up per SoC partially Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 10:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-06 11:02 ` Alexander Dahl
2026-11-15 14:35 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] dt-bindings: clock: at91: Allow referencing main rc oscillator in DT Alexander Dahl
2026-11-06 11:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-15 14:34 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] clk: at91: Use new per SoC PMC clock index definitions Alexander Dahl
2026-11-15 14:29 ` Claudiu Beznea [this message]
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] clk: at91: Allow enabling main_rc_osc through DT Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 14:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 2:39 ` kernel test robot
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] clk: at91: Add peripheral clock id for OTPC Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 14:28 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] dt-bindings: nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add required clocks Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 11:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Avoid reading a write-only register Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Fix swapped 'sleep' and 'timeout' parameters Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Enable necessary clocks Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Expose UID registers as 2nd nvmem device Alexander Dahl
2026-11-15 14:28 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] ARM: dts: microchip: Use new per SoC PMC bindings Alexander Dahl
2026-11-15 14:28 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] ARM: dts: microchip: sama7g5: Add OTPC clocks Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 14:27 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Add OTPC node Alexander Dahl
2026-11-15 14:35 ` claudiu beznea
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60_curiosity: Enable OTP Controller Alexander Dahl
2026-11-05 14:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 14:27 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-11-05 11:06 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] dt-bindings: clock: at91: Remove old PMC definitions Alexander Dahl
2026-11-15 14:22 ` Claudiu Beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c05aefdc-7b60-472b-ae08-2c3af3cd533f@kernel.org \
--to=claudiu.beznea@kernel.org \
--cc=ada@thorsis.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bmasney+clk@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=durai.manickamkr@microchip.com \
--cc=jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manikandan.m@microchip.com \
--cc=mihai.sain@microchip.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=ryan.wanner@microchip.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox