Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add icc provider ability to gcc

Konrad Dybcio
2024-04-30T10:05:37Z

On 25.04.2024 12:26 PM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/18/24 11:23, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>> IPQ SoCs dont involve RPM in managing NoC related clocks and
>>> there is no NoC scaling. Linux itself handles these clocks.
>>> However, these should not be exposed as just clocks and align
>>> with other Qualcomm SoCs that handle these clocks from a
>>> interconnect provider.
>>>
>>> Hence include icc provider capability to the gcc node so that
>>> peripherals can use the interconnect facility to enable these
>>> clocks.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> If this is all you do to enable interconnect (which is not the case,
>> as this patch only satisfies the bindings checker, the meaningful
>> change happens in the previous patch) and nothing explodes, this is
>> an apparent sign of your driver doing nothing.
>
> It appears to do nothing because, we are just enabling the clock
> provider to also act as interconnect provider. Only when the
> consumers are enabled with interconnect usage, this will create
> paths and turn on the relevant NOC clocks.

No, with sync_state it actually does "something" (sets the interconnect
path bandwidths to zero). And *this* patch does nothing functionally,
it only makes the dt checker happy.

>
> This interconnect will be used by the PCIe and NSS blocks. When
> those patches were posted earlier, they were put on hold until
> interconnect driver is available.
>
> Once this patch gets in, PCIe for example will make use of icc.
> Please refer to https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230519090219.15925-5-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com/.
>
> The 'pcieX' nodes will include the following entries.
>
> interconnects = <&gcc MASTER_ANOC_PCIE0 &gcc SLAVE_ANOC_PCIE0>,
> <&gcc MASTER_SNOC_PCIE0 &gcc SLAVE_SNOC_PCIE0>;
> interconnect-names = "pcie-mem", "cpu-pcie";

Okay. What about USB that's already enabled? And BIMC/MEMNOC?

>
>> The expected reaction to "enabling interconnect" without defining the
>> required paths for your hardware would be a crash-on-sync_state, as all
>> unused (from Linux's POV) resources ought to be shut down.
>>
>> Because you lack sync_state, the interconnects silently retain the state
>> that they were left in (which is not deterministic), and that's precisely
>> what we want to avoid.
>
> I tried to set 'sync_state' to icc_sync_state to be invoked and
> didn't see any crash.

Have you confirmed that the registers are actually written to, and with
correct values?

Konrad