From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5-subcmu: Use pm_runtime_get_sync() during probe
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:01:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172780@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015115008.600082-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pm: missing error check for pm_runtime_get_sync() allows unpowered register access
- [High] clk: samsung: exynos5-subcmu: race condition on global ctx->dev
--
commit fe90e32911f3916661d4731141c07feca831815e
Author: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
clk: samsung: exynos5-subcmu: Use pm_runtime_get_sync() during probe
This commit changes the probe function to use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead
of pm_runtime_get(). This ensures that the device and its power domain are
fully active before accessing clock registers during registration.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c
> index 3731298473013..1d7eb98b72cf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5-subcmu.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static int __init exynos5_subcmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> - pm_runtime_get(dev);
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
[Severity: High]
Is it safe to ignore the return value of pm_runtime_get_sync()?
If it returns a negative error code (e.g. hardware failure, regulator
issue, or timeout), proceeding to call samsung_clk_register_div() and
samsung_clk_register_gate() will read unpowered hardware registers, which
can cause a synchronous external abort or data corruption.
Should this check the return value, abort the probe, and roll back PM
operations on failure?
>
> ctx->dev = dev;
> samsung_clk_register_div(ctx, info->div_clks, info->nr_div_clks);
> samsung_clk_register_gate(ctx, info->gate_clks, info->nr_gate_clks);
> ctx->dev = NULL;
[Severity: High]
Does assigning and clearing the shared global ctx->dev without locking
introduce a race condition during concurrent asynchronous probes?
If asynchronous probing is enabled via driver_async_probe, multiple
exynos5-subcmu devices could probe concurrently. Since pm_runtime_get_sync()
can sleep, this widens the race window where concurrent threads could
overwrite ctx->dev or prematurely clear it to NULL while another thread is
still registering its clocks.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015115008.600082-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20261015115020eucas1p1652dcb97079fc506b99422994680d76e@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2026-10-15 11:50 ` [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5-subcmu: Use pm_runtime_get_sync() during probe Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-15 12:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172780@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox