From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jelly Jia" <Jelly.Jia@cixtech.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] arm64: dts: cix: Add the Sky1 AUDSS DMA-350 integration
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 10:28:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-182685@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023093045.3248630-6-Jelly.Jia@cixtech.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] clk: cix: unclocked MMIO access in sky1_audss_irq_teardown() and IRQ callbacks
- [High] clk: cix: IRQ storm in sky1_audss_irq_handler() due to handle_untracked_irq()
- [High] clk: cix: invalid wait context in sky1_audss_irq_handler() via non-raw regmap
- [High] clk: cix: missing virq disposal before irq_domain_remove() in teardown
- [High] arm64: dts: cix: audss_dmac reset AUDSS_SW_RST lost across AUDSS CRU suspend
--
commit 5fc04062b961f79314208fe23d9fe7413f932103
Author: Jelly Jia <Jelly.Jia@cixtech.com>
arm64: dts: cix: Add the Sky1 AUDSS DMA-350 integration
This commit adds the audss-dma-bus and audss_dmac nodes for the Sky1 AUDSS
DMA-350 controller and wires its clocks, resets, and channel interrupts
through the audss_cru controller.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/sky1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/sky1.dtsi
> index cd498ee7e9a76..6ca94f606463c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/sky1.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/sky1.dtsi
> @@ -588,17 +588,41 @@ mbox_pm2ap: mailbox@65a0080 {
> cix,mbox-dir = "rx";
> };
>
> + audss-dma-bus {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + ranges;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + dma-ranges = <0x0 0x20000000 0x0 0x07010000 0x0 0x00100000>,
> + <0x0 0x30000000 0x0 0xc0000000 0x0 0x20000000>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + audss_dmac: dma-controller@7010000 {
> + compatible = "arm,dma-350";
> + reg = <0x0 0x07010000 0x0 0x10000>;
> + clocks = <&audss_cru CLK_DMAC_AXI>;
> + #dma-cells = <1>;
> + dma-channel-mask = <0xff>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&audss_cru>;
> + interrupts = <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>,
> + <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>;
> + resets = <&audss_cru AUDSS_DMAC_SW_RST>;
[Severity: High]
Will the AUDSS_DMAC_SW_RST reset state for audss_dmac survive a system
suspend and resume cycle of audss_cru?
In drivers/dma/arm-dma350.c, d350_probe() deasserts the reset once at probe
time and the driver defines no power management callbacks:
drivers/dma/arm-dma350.c:d350_probe() {
reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive_deasserted(dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(reset))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(reset),
"failed to deassert reset\n");
}
That call goes through sky1_audss_reset_deassert() -> sky1_audss_reset_set()
in drivers/reset/reset-sky1-audss.c to set BIT(15) in AUDSS_SW_RST (0x78).
However, when audss_cru suspends via sky1_audss_clk_runtime_suspend() in
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c, it saves only the registers listed in
sky1_reg_save[] before asserting priv->rst_noc:
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c:
static u32 sky1_reg_save[][2] = {
{ INFO_HIFI0, 0 },
{ INFO_CLK_GATE, 0 },
{ INFO_CLK_DIV, 0 },
{ INFO_CLK_MUX, 0 },
{ INFO_AP_IRQC, 0 },
{ INFO_MCLK, 0 },
};
Because AUDSS_SW_RST (0x78) is not included in sky1_reg_save[], asserting
priv->rst_noc and powering down SKY1_PD_AUDIO resets AUDSS_SW_RST, leaving
audss_dmac held in hardware reset after sky1_audss_clk_runtime_resume()
runs.
> + };
> + };
> +
> audss_cru: clock-controller@7110000 {
> compatible = "cix,sky1-audss-cru";
> reg = <0x0 0x07110000 0x0 0x10000>;
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> - #reset-cells = <1>;
> clocks = <&scmi_clk CLK_TREE_AUDIO_CLK0>,
> <&scmi_clk CLK_TREE_AUDIO_CLK2>,
> <&scmi_clk CLK_TREE_AUDIO_CLK4>,
> <&scmi_clk CLK_TREE_AUDIO_CLK5>;
> clock-names = "x8k", "x11k", "sys", "48m";
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 230 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
[Severity: High]
Can wiring audss_cru as an interrupt-controller trigger unclocked register
accesses to INFO_AP_IRQC while audss_cru is runtime-suspended and held in
reset?
In drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c, sky1_audss_clk_probe() initializes the
irqchip and then drops the runtime PM reference:
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c:sky1_audss_clk_probe() {
/* Tear the irqchip down before the runtime-PM cleanup disables clocks. */
ret = sky1_audss_irq_init(pdev, priv);
if (ret) {
dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to set up AUDSS DMA IRQs\n");
goto fail_pm;
}
pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
}
Whenever no consumer clock is prepared, sky1_audss_clk_runtime_suspend()
asserts priv->rst_noc and disables the parent clocks via
sky1_audss_clks_disable(priv):
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c:sky1_audss_clk_runtime_suspend() {
...
reset_control_assert(priv->rst_noc);
sky1_audss_clks_disable(priv);
}
During driver unbind in __device_release_driver(),
device_links_unbind_consumers() unbinds audss_dmac (unpreparing
CLK_DMAC_AXI), and pm_runtime_put_sync() suspends audss_cru before
device_unbind_cleanup() -> devres_release_all() runs
sky1_audss_irq_teardown():
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c:sky1_audss_irq_teardown() {
struct sky1_audss_clks_priv *priv = data;
regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap_cru, INFO_AP_IRQC,
INFO_AP_IRQC_DMAC_MASK, 0);
irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(priv->parent_irq, NULL, NULL);
irq_domain_remove(priv->irq_domain);
}
In addition, sky1_audss_irq_init() does not call irq_domain_set_pm_device()
and leaves GIC_SPI 230 active while suspended, so sky1_audss_irq_teardown(),
sky1_audss_irq_mask(), sky1_audss_irq_unmask(), or sky1_audss_irq_handler()
can access INFO_AP_IRQC while priv->rst_noc is asserted and the parent
clocks are disabled.
[Severity: High]
Could routing the level-high GIC_SPI 230 interrupt through
sky1_audss_irq_handler() and handle_untracked_irq() cause an interrupt storm
or spurious interrupt replay?
In drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c, sky1_audss_irq_chip provides only
.irq_mask and .irq_unmask, and sky1_audss_irq_map() sets
handle_untracked_irq without IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY or IRQ_NOTHREAD:
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c:
static struct irq_chip sky1_audss_irq_chip = {
.name = "sky1-audss-dmac",
.irq_mask = sky1_audss_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = sky1_audss_irq_unmask,
.flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
};
static int sky1_audss_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
{
if (hwirq >= SKY1_AUDSS_DMAC_IRQS)
return -EINVAL;
irq_set_chip_data(irq, d->host_data);
irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &sky1_audss_irq_chip,
handle_untracked_irq);
irq_set_noprobe(irq);
return 0;
}
When sky1_audss_irq_handler() runs, it reads the gate mask in INFO_AP_IRQC
and dispatches every unmasked channel bit:
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c:sky1_audss_irq_handler() {
if (!regmap_read(priv->regmap_cru, INFO_AP_IRQC, &val)) {
enabled = val & INFO_AP_IRQC_DMAC_MASK;
for_each_set_bit(hwirq, &enabled, SKY1_AUDSS_DMAC_IRQS)
generic_handle_domain_irq(priv->irq_domain, hwirq);
}
}
Because handle_untracked_irq() in kernel/irq/chip.c returns early when
!irq_can_handle(desc) without calling mask_irq(desc), and does not mask
IRQS_ONESHOT interrupts:
1. If disable_irq() or suspend_device_irqs() lazily disables a channel, its
bit in INFO_AP_IRQC stays set. If that channel asserts its level-high
interrupt, handle_untracked_irq() neither masks INFO_AP_IRQC nor runs
d350_irq() to clear CH_STATUS, leaving GIC_SPI 230 asserted in an
infinite hard-IRQ loop.
2. Under CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT or threadirqs, request_irq() in
d350_alloc_chan_resources() is force-threaded with IRQF_ONESHOT, and
handle_untracked_irq() leaves the interrupt unmasked while waking the
IRQ thread, re-triggering GIC_SPI 230 continuously.
3. When any enabled channel fires, sky1_audss_irq_handler() calls
generic_handle_domain_irq() for every lazily-disabled sibling channel
still enabled in INFO_AP_IRQC, which sets IRQS_PENDING on idle channels
and causes a spurious replay on enable_irq() or resume_device_irqs().
[Severity: High]
Does accessing priv->regmap_cru from sky1_audss_irq_mask(),
sky1_audss_irq_unmask(), and sky1_audss_irq_handler() trigger an invalid
wait context warning?
In drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c, sky1_audss_regmap_config does not set
.use_raw_spinlock = true:
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c:
static const struct regmap_config sky1_audss_regmap_config = {
.reg_bits = 32,
.val_bits = 32,
.reg_stride = 4,
};
As a result, __regmap_init() configures priv->regmap_cru to use a non-raw
spinlock_t (which becomes a sleeping lock on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT). When
audss_dmac requests or handles its channel interrupts:
- sky1_audss_irq_mask() and sky1_audss_irq_unmask() call
regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap_cru, INFO_AP_IRQC, ...) while the IRQ core
holds desc->lock (a raw_spinlock_t).
- sky1_audss_irq_handler() runs as a chained handler in hard-IRQ context and
calls regmap_read(priv->regmap_cru, INFO_AP_IRQC, &val).
Should sky1_audss_regmap_config set .use_raw_spinlock = true so that
priv->regmap_cru can be safely accessed from raw_spinlock_t and hard-IRQ
contexts?
[Severity: High]
Does sky1_audss_irq_teardown() leak the mapped virq descriptors and leave
dangling pointers when audss_cru is unbound?
When d350_probe() calls platform_get_irq() for the 8 audss_dmac channels,
of_irq_get() -> irq_create_of_mapping() populates priv->irq_domain's
revmap_tree and invokes sky1_audss_irq_map(), storing pointers to priv,
priv->irq_domain, and sky1_audss_irq_chip in each irq_desc.
However, sky1_audss_irq_teardown() calls irq_domain_remove() without first
disposing the mappings via irq_dispose_mapping():
drivers/clk/cix/clk-sky1-audss.c:sky1_audss_irq_teardown() {
struct sky1_audss_clks_priv *priv = data;
regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap_cru, INFO_AP_IRQC,
INFO_AP_IRQC_DMAC_MASK, 0);
irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(priv->parent_irq, NULL, NULL);
irq_domain_remove(priv->irq_domain);
}
In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c, irq_domain_remove() triggers
WARN_ON(!radix_tree_empty(&domain->revmap_tree)) and frees priv->irq_domain,
leaving the 8 allocated irq_desc descriptors in sparse_irqs with dangling
references to the freed domain, devm-freed priv data, and module rodata if
/proc/interrupts or /sys/kernel/irq/<virq>/chip_name is subsequently read.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261023093045.3248630-1-Jelly.Jia@cixtech.com?part=5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 9:30 [PATCH v1 0/5] soc: cix: Add the Sky1 AUDSS DMA-350 interrupt path Jelly Jia
2026-10-23 9:30 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] dt-bindings: soc: cix: Describe the Sky1 AUDSS DMA IRQ controller Jelly Jia
2026-10-26 8:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-29 5:25 ` Jelly Jia
2026-10-23 9:30 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] clk: cix: Handle Sky1 AUDSS DMA interrupt gates as an irqchip Jelly Jia
2026-10-23 9:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 9:30 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] dt-bindings: dma: arm,dma-350: Document dma-channel-mask Jelly Jia
2026-10-26 8:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-23 9:30 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] dmaengine: arm-dma350: Honour dma-channel-mask Jelly Jia
2026-10-28 16:47 ` Frank Li
2026-10-29 5:18 ` Jelly Jia
2026-10-23 9:30 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] arm64: dts: cix: Add the Sky1 AUDSS DMA-350 integration Jelly Jia
2026-10-23 10:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-182685@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Jelly.Jia@cixtech.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox