From: "Gupta, Pankaj" <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Punit Salian <psalian@google.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: mark DAX VMA page protections as decrypted
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:00:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004afd12-762d-45d6-ab75-037d58e7a359@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <909ab2ef-b931-4a64-acfc-13096f232a07@amd.com>
>>> In confidential computing guest environments (such as AMD SEV-SNP or
>>> Intel TDX), direct memory access (DAX) mappings between the guest kernel
>>> and host-backed FUSE/virtiofs shared memory regions must be accessed
>>> using shared (decrypted) page protections.
>>>
>>> Modify fuse_dax_mmap() to apply pgprot_decrypted() to vma->vm_page_prot
>>> when establishing FUSE DAX memory mappings. This ensures guest page
>>> table entries for shared DAX buffers are explicitly marked as decrypted,
>>> preventing memory encryption faults when accessing host-shared DAX memory.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Punit Salian <psalian@google.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/fuse/dax.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dax.c b/fs/fuse/dax.c
>>> index a15c464c8d19..00e316a7f805 100644
>>> --- a/fs/fuse/dax.c
>>> +++ b/fs/fuse/dax.c
>>> @@ -826,6 +826,7 @@ int fuse_dax_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>> file_accessed(file);
>>> vma->vm_ops = &fuse_dax_vm_ops;
>>> vm_flags_set(vma, VM_MIXEDMAP | VM_HUGEPAGE);
>>> + vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_decrypted(vma->vm_page_prot);
For virtio-pmem on host with SEV support we addressed similar issue by
marking FS DAX device memory decrypted in memremap_pages()
(commit 867400af90f1, "mm/memremap.c: map FS_DAX device memory as
decrypted"), since the device memory
is mapped though the kernel address space there. For virtio-fs DAX we
don't seem to have such a central location so
VMA level handling seems reasonable fix to me.
That said, I'm not entirely certain about all of the security
implications in a CoCo environment, given that the host is generally
considered untrusted
and virtio-fs involves sharing host-backed memory with the guest. Till
we get some mechanism to access this memory as encrypted, we can have
this support
with existing security practices for virtio-fs:
Acked-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260727210718.125872-1-psalian@google.com>
2026-08-18 11:38 ` [PATCH] fuse: mark DAX VMA page protections as decrypted Miklos Szeredi
2026-08-18 13:42 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-08-18 16:00 ` Gupta, Pankaj [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=004afd12-762d-45d6-ab75-037d58e7a359@amd.com \
--to=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=psalian@google.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox