From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com [209.85.208.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9162627EC for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 15:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744213678; cv=none; b=qbiH+5BdXCFVCjYJkJQxk+RDqIhm6qC9XslLj0IQ2f9CP3HZjelvBDX2TUeromgsT3V9oYVvi7nML0yfgcPD5KGTbT2G0FLs/YPZtjoCspi2AXcgLPtqsrg2Db3WuToMdyit176C8qiwAqnbOqVZG/jh0fRsNDo9QlTRthR8kQY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744213678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jCABnoSlxxQFUAs31j2dDgPFt6TkJT+wt4+DPGFWvNU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=XlWo3RrWwbzoNeRNcttVdr+P2zdp7R9HlhkQYbCO2vS8OkKN5kkE1MXpstjaZOQZ4RJVGWCyrOlkBZkHuZsUrAr6d2bYGJMdPZPXeSLqiOy9JjiCvN3V/g1cJFEShLclTSCH+sgmAnDPkrm5hMw2xxnNs1kE81srTt24BZahJdk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=ZG835430; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="ZG835430" Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e6194e9d2cso13094143a12.2 for ; Wed, 09 Apr 2025 08:47:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1744213674; x=1744818474; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:from :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nJ9MrfmGdx/admoRpqYzf488HmvpMXteQ9lPzY9ZRZc=; b=ZG835430vRHEFRke5szlXEk/hca/1lZG0FiCmnzfqistCKvG3fveGLpwGWUHydx2U0 sC7Km8+rgmxAWDCuMdnP3arxjVWnBZju1YVrUxHagZZqE9gyGAKXKqYwZIpukGj/0qZl MeAC8w79/WLTbGXl8BmUkZc9J7ynXMlT8e5y4co24akADoExz62xTl69i4SyfY6rU6RP 67LqirvsSdwNoTzu6YmHpns0J22+0S2lYdWCQPnUw6M4WDT2GU/KV57kGpzVfuGguiqf ARnq3uOwabT4j5QS4W3PVB0ugGdK+bjk+ZxYvCgMN6xZs7PnmpzDBS70lUCM2oX0LzxD PPzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744213674; x=1744818474; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:from :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nJ9MrfmGdx/admoRpqYzf488HmvpMXteQ9lPzY9ZRZc=; b=wKGodw0r68Gw2Qk3lKpZsQO6kDZq0G15i+bJoCfafXh4ZKHXc8hsavTtHT2L/9AeBF Ppaimajkr9+3C1T81eTHzHwaPXihw0BBSqHcI5EKbC344DkfUavhdkV5DUPV6X04QRdr p5SQ7e4C9r8zArS2NwdaNgx2Ja5QTmfHOVb6oTr9AhXOIMtqdZenHkEG6UW2bnY8xsCe OjhcL1f9FfkJ/iBI8u1Tah8Nrp+k5m0iW4EwCaTFivEKSHJqwBxmQl0YWDvc2zdgg6es pE9NMhsl+pFgrJcm9zGHx2sZXDPKdHFGmmwPMoqjJEFKR2yKaQFgv4aXRtNDvgm/6hFn tKog== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXb4Uh2+6XBlzjQ3lB9WH5VRMcVvIa8HvDAw48DazEx4WRQ10xJlJFB1tmloNktXPE85p0GqL/YPzhW@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YziJVcVz6lZGgc8dJj6Rj1UqGLxVSHKLLcyORLK6JHRhycCXuK+ Imi9zrC9U6DLwAPFnf/lPdDYUwkw/p3g9u0xbMcV9uWYScdYWswVfxslQ67cSNY= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu+vyon+KdkWDWPy8mHA604TA7W8VGB9FwzARM5IhLvAPDp7M3f3C/JHP/gKRV zbUoL+4ukmnlJySk6dX6f/1viQb89BiDaHoaccqCcGG+9+GmByP7xiaBhS3neta9Lz0s+6PPZGk cIlMftR/mcae6A9kC25kp6CaFc7rJwAc+ZL/HMg+EOzS6dYIQaIM1IhgA1IMhnlWIiRrQuWNVbS /ohenoYKuj6O3A4N/vdrNwpVkMf7bTNLiTN8d3l0V3DNJrzchfRI+UsEp2ehwZJXqFKV2DQ5Gdo 1xfy3pt3nbalZM4Pkdu4udIEuKK8Vm67LZEJwvaWyXe1wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHo0do0fKxRZomTsqBtbKndZIYZugYhxWasrmrbi70luUu4m++JfZsaxZzQDLqrDx2E46ZGJA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2cc4:b0:ac7:391a:e158 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-aca9d73ab50mr270802066b.59.1744213674410; Wed, 09 Apr 2025 08:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.20] ([212.21.133.214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-acaa1ce7317sm114172666b.177.2025.04.09.08.47.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Apr 2025 08:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00b29ba9-e886-4464-be39-731789cef72b@suse.com> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 18:47:52 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow individual features to be locked down To: Dan Williams , Paul Moore Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, serge@hallyn.com, kees@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev References: <20250321102422.640271-1-nik.borisov@suse.com> <67f69600ed221_71fe2946f@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> From: Nikolay Borisov Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <67f69600ed221_71fe2946f@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 9.04.25 г. 18:45 ч., Dan Williams wrote: > Paul Moore wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 6:24 AM Nikolay Borisov wrote: >>> >>> This simple change allows usecases where someone might want to lock only specific >>> feature at a finer granularity than integrity/confidentiality levels allows. >>> The first likely user of this is the CoCo subsystem where certain features will be >>> disabled. >>> >>> Nikolay Borisov (2): >>> lockdown: Switch implementation to using bitmap >>> lockdown/kunit: Introduce kunit tests >> >> Hi Nikolay, >> >> Thanks for the patches! With the merge window opening in a few days, >> it is too late to consider this for the upcoming merge window so >> realistically this patchset is two weeks out and I'm hopeful we'll >> have a dedicated Lockdown maintainer by then so I'm going to defer the >> ultimate decision on acceptance to them. > > The patches in this thread proposed to selectively disable /dev/mem > independent of all the other lockdown mitigations. That goal can be > achieved with more precision with this proposed patch: > > http://lore.kernel.org/67f5b75c37143_71fe2949b@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch True, however I think increasing the granularity of the lockdown subsystem merits its own discussion, notwithstanding COCO use case.