From: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, bgardon@google.com,
seanjc@google.com, erdemaktas@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
jxgao@google.com, sagis@google.com, oupton@google.com,
peterx@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, dmatlack@google.com,
pgonda@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev, corbet@lwn.net,
hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, bp@suse.de,
rostedt@goodmis.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 3/5] x86: CVMs: Enable dynamic swiotlb by default for CVMs
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:20:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fda610f-a8ae-4133-a9d5-e9084c88ba7b@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240112055251.36101-4-vannapurve@google.com>
On 12/01/2024 06:52, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
> CVMs used SWIOTLB for non-trusted IO using dma_map_* APIs. This series
> will ensure that dma_alloc_* API to also allocate from SWIOTLB pools.
> Initial size of SWIOTLB pool is decided using heuristics and has been
> working with CVM usecases so far.
>
> It's better to allow SWIOTLB to scale up on demand rather than keeping
> the size fixed to avoid failures with possibly increased usage of
> SWIOTLB with dma_alloc_* APIs allocating from SWIOTLB pools. This should
> also help in future with more devices getting used from CVMs for
> non-trusted IO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 1566748f16c4..035c8a022c4c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -884,6 +884,7 @@ config INTEL_TDX_GUEST
> select X86_MEM_ENCRYPT
> select X86_MCE
> select UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
> + select SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC
> help
> Support running as a guest under Intel TDX. Without this support,
> the guest kernel can not boot or run under TDX.
> @@ -1534,6 +1535,7 @@ config AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> select ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM
> select X86_MEM_ENCRYPT
> select UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
> + select SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC
> help
> Say yes to enable support for the encryption of system memory.
> This requires an AMD processor that supports Secure Memory
What this does is unconditionally enable SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC for every kernel compiled
to support memory encryption, regardless of whether it runs inside a confidential guest.
I don't think that is what you intended.
Best wishes,
Jeremi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-12 5:52 [RFC V1 0/5] x86: CVMs: Align memory conversions to 2M granularity Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 1/5] swiotlb: Support allocating DMA memory from SWIOTLB Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-14 14:49 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-15 3:33 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-15 9:44 ` Alexander Graf
2024-02-15 20:26 ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-24 17:07 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-24 22:02 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-05 17:19 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 2/5] swiotlb: Allow setting up default alignment of SWIOTLB region Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 3/5] x86: CVMs: Enable dynamic swiotlb by default for CVMs Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-01 12:20 ` Jeremi Piotrowski [this message]
2024-02-02 4:40 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 4/5] x86: CVMs: Allow allocating all DMA memory from SWIOTLB Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:17 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 3:41 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 5/5] x86: CVMs: Ensure that memory conversions happen at 2M alignment Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:33 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 3:46 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-01 12:02 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2024-02-02 5:08 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-02 8:00 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2024-02-02 16:22 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-02 16:35 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-03 5:19 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-30 16:42 ` [RFC V1 0/5] x86: CVMs: Align memory conversions to 2M granularity Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 5:44 ` Vishal Annapurve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fda610f-a8ae-4133-a9d5-e9084c88ba7b@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=jxgao@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).