From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E803D3446A9 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 16:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770828048; cv=none; b=sh4aNJMABJ0NxW3nVlYDF6lSRtF1VpXH307rvWhXtYp0QZalpLzuVkEAWZ8odphRtCzuM2dRoMOl8bm0mebD3inHUNpwUS22Qu14g4ENng0e7alF74Ri7rTKzcvp2yL3G5LLgE9+PoQ/DnQzJ6xmSZQCNkypQoNH2tWbMO9Xtys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770828048; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sfbHZBMxQmyB0nITpm3osghpDwzqSEZRCALukjDtJTc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Mzk1h7g/ZukFU6SVlY3SivlG3bLkkv1VS9YTaBAYtJT5V0xGsQwP5LdsvzfrYm9ooUj5Zjr1w7vcKPnr1LijdwdDGFPSbn6eEC9cne41WcijfR8MsQdfKD1qMk5U88bxNnQgFkZ+iySXALbJdjwvQ14glN7KUz6hUFqeqfnkV94= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bcNsvwnT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bcNsvwnT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770828047; x=1802364047; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sfbHZBMxQmyB0nITpm3osghpDwzqSEZRCALukjDtJTc=; b=bcNsvwnTzDBEp0NuN69re+CMVJ/OsC3lYOZShR0aZt+HyufEV/PBrYT5 WNqHdYWnIwwCTpOFqbXPHR1PZ7BcDmBEUPqMvvGK37ZFWq/yuz1SIyfh0 LBtnnC7SwMk9kuaPNP0PiOy6jQ03EVG7nTB8BIw/pfF7tewDqxC/Xby3G Uj5OHQhyLjIL78Y7FF21K3cQJlL5lm0vDDUINSFsY7kIRH3EconP1D/9f jaMBiXsV62Z9tJiCN/YBhTftsmBEX6zaopZzpnB8gI1Lx8308RCwNQwkN wRv3Ck53nw24cRqYcgvRNmf9aXz/PI3vglkg9FeXZi/I7a3XVXmOJ3uMX A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ry1MOvV0SgGi1BkXcLG5Ig== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wKfoClLIRZy66G/HEj67IA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11698"; a="74578836" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,285,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="74578836" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2026 08:40:46 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: JYivVb5TQAyMc2q2MCAVCA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ppXPTcAuR62H/dSOTTDrfw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,285,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="211599372" Received: from soc-pf446t5c.clients.intel.com (HELO [10.24.81.126]) ([10.24.81.126]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2026 08:40:47 -0800 Message-ID: <163b74e8-eede-4872-9319-047db25c0050@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:40:46 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] virt: tsm: Document size limits for outblob attributes To: dan.j.williams@intel.com, "Kirill A . Shutemov" Cc: Dave Hansen , Rick Edgecombe , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev References: <20260211001712.1531955-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> <20260211001712.1531955-2-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> <698be62f7802_8c32100e2@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> Content-Language: en-US From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan In-Reply-To: <698be62f7802_8c32100e2@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Dan, On 2/10/2026 6:15 PM, dan.j.williams@intel.com wrote: > Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: >> The configfs-tsm-report interface can fail with -EFBIG when the >> attestation report generated by a TSM provider exceeds internal >> maximums (TSM_REPORT_OUTBLOB_MAX). However, this error condition and >> its handling are not currently documented in the ABI. >> >> Userspace tools need to understand how to interpret various error >> conditions when reading attestation reports. >> >> Document that reads fail with -EFBIG when reports exceed size limits, >> with guidance on how to resolve them. >> >> Reviewed-by: Fang Peter >> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > Looks good, I will change the subject to: > > "configfs-tsm-report: Document size limits for outblob attributes" Thanks for the review! Are you planning to apply this with the updated subject line, or would you like me to send a v2 with the change? -- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer