From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
<brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
<marcorr@google.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 28/45] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI kexec handling into common code
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:10:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220209181039.1262882-29-brijesh.singh@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209181039.1262882-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Future patches for SEV-SNP-validated CPUID will also require early
parsing of the EFI configuration. Incrementally move the related code
into a set of helpers that can be re-used for that purpose.
In this instance, the current acpi.c kexec handling is mainly used to
get the alternative EFI config table address provided by kexec via a
setup_data entry of type SETUP_EFI. If not present, the code then falls
back to normal EFI config table address provided by EFI system table.
This would need to be done by all call-sites attempting to access the
EFI config table, so just have efi_get_conf_table() handle that
automatically.
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c | 59 ---------------------------------
arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
index b0c1dffc5510..64b172dabd5c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
@@ -47,57 +47,6 @@ __efi_get_rsdp_addr(unsigned long cfg_tbl_pa, unsigned int cfg_tbl_len)
return 0;
}
-/* EFI/kexec support is 64-bit only. */
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-static struct efi_setup_data *get_kexec_setup_data_addr(void)
-{
- struct setup_data *data;
- u64 pa_data;
-
- pa_data = boot_params->hdr.setup_data;
- while (pa_data) {
- data = (struct setup_data *)pa_data;
- if (data->type == SETUP_EFI)
- return (struct efi_setup_data *)(pa_data + sizeof(struct setup_data));
-
- pa_data = data->next;
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static acpi_physical_address kexec_get_rsdp_addr(void)
-{
- efi_system_table_64_t *systab;
- struct efi_setup_data *esd;
- struct efi_info *ei;
- enum efi_type et;
-
- esd = (struct efi_setup_data *)get_kexec_setup_data_addr();
- if (!esd)
- return 0;
-
- if (!esd->tables) {
- debug_putstr("Wrong kexec SETUP_EFI data.\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
- et = efi_get_type(boot_params);
- if (et != EFI_TYPE_64) {
- debug_putstr("Unexpected kexec EFI environment (expected 64-bit EFI).\n");
- return 0;
- }
-
- /* Get systab from boot params. */
- systab = (efi_system_table_64_t *)efi_get_system_table(boot_params);
- if (!systab)
- error("EFI system table not found in kexec boot_params.");
-
- return __efi_get_rsdp_addr((unsigned long)esd->tables, systab->nr_tables);
-}
-#else
-static acpi_physical_address kexec_get_rsdp_addr(void) { return 0; }
-#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-
static acpi_physical_address efi_get_rsdp_addr(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
@@ -210,14 +159,6 @@ acpi_physical_address get_rsdp_addr(void)
pa = boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr;
- /*
- * Try to get EFI data from setup_data. This can happen when we're a
- * kexec'ed kernel and kexec(1) has passed all the required EFI info to
- * us.
- */
- if (!pa)
- pa = kexec_get_rsdp_addr();
-
if (!pa)
pa = efi_get_rsdp_addr();
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.c
index f8d26db22659..ff2e2eaba1d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.c
@@ -78,6 +78,46 @@ unsigned long efi_get_system_table(struct boot_params *bp)
return sys_tbl_pa;
}
+/*
+ * EFI config table address changes to virtual address after boot, which may
+ * not be accessible for the kexec'd kernel. To address this, kexec provides
+ * the initial physical address via a struct setup_data entry, which is
+ * checked for here, along with some sanity checks.
+ */
+static struct efi_setup_data *get_kexec_setup_data(struct boot_params *bp,
+ enum efi_type et)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ struct efi_setup_data *esd = NULL;
+ struct setup_data *data;
+ u64 pa_data;
+
+ pa_data = bp->hdr.setup_data;
+ while (pa_data) {
+ data = (struct setup_data *)pa_data;
+ if (data->type == SETUP_EFI) {
+ esd = (struct efi_setup_data *)(pa_data + sizeof(struct setup_data));
+ break;
+ }
+
+ pa_data = data->next;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Original ACPI code falls back to attempting normal EFI boot in these
+ * cases, so maintain existing behavior by indicating non-kexec
+ * environment to the caller, but print them for debugging.
+ */
+ if (esd && !esd->tables) {
+ debug_putstr("kexec EFI environment missing valid configuration table.\n");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return esd;
+#endif
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/**
* efi_get_conf_table - Given a pointer to boot_params, locate and return the physical
* address of EFI configuration table.
@@ -106,8 +146,12 @@ int efi_get_conf_table(struct boot_params *bp, unsigned long *cfg_tbl_pa,
et = efi_get_type(bp);
if (et == EFI_TYPE_64) {
efi_system_table_64_t *stbl = (efi_system_table_64_t *)sys_tbl_pa;
+ struct efi_setup_data *esd;
- *cfg_tbl_pa = stbl->tables;
+ /* kexec provides an alternative EFI conf table, check for it. */
+ esd = get_kexec_setup_data(bp, et);
+
+ *cfg_tbl_pa = esd ? esd->tables : stbl->tables;
*cfg_tbl_len = stbl->nr_tables;
} else if (et == EFI_TYPE_32) {
efi_system_table_32_t *stbl = (efi_system_table_32_t *)sys_tbl_pa;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-09 18:09 [PATCH v10 00/45] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Guest Support Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:09 ` [PATCH v10 01/45] KVM: SVM: Define sev_features and vmpl field in the VMSA Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:09 ` [PATCH v10 02/45] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the SEV-ES save area Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:09 ` [PATCH v10 03/45] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the GHCB " Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:09 ` [PATCH v10 04/45] KVM: SVM: Update the SEV-ES save area mapping Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:09 ` [PATCH v10 05/45] x86/boot: Introduce helpers for MSR reads/writes Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 06/45] x86/boot: Use MSR read/write helpers instead of inline assembly Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 07/45] x86/compressed/64: Detect/setup SEV/SME features earlier in boot Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 08/45] x86/sev: " Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 09/45] x86/mm: Extend cc_attr to include AMD SEV-SNP Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 10/45] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 11/45] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 12/45] x86/sev: Check SEV-SNP features support Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 13/45] x86/sev: Add a helper for the PVALIDATE instruction Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 14/45] x86/sev: Check the vmpl level Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 15/45] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 16/45] x86/compressed: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 17/45] x86/sev: " Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 18/45] x86/sev: Add helper for validating pages in early enc attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 19/45] x86/kernel: Make the .bss..decrypted section shared in RMP table Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 20/45] x86/kernel: Validate ROM memory before accessing when SEV-SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 21/45] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit Brijesh Singh
2022-02-10 16:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-11 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-11 17:27 ` Brijesh Singh
2022-02-13 12:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-13 14:50 ` Tom Lendacky
2022-02-13 17:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-15 12:43 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-02-15 12:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-15 13:15 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-02-15 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-16 13:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 22/45] x86/sev: Use SEV-SNP AP creation to start secondary CPUs Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 23/45] x86/head/64: Re-enable stack protection Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 24/45] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI detection to helper Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 25/45] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI system table lookup " Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 26/45] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI config " Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 27/45] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI vendor " Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 29/45] x86/boot: Add Confidential Computing type to setup_data Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 30/45] KVM: x86: Move lookup of indexed CPUID leafs to helper Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 31/45] x86/sev: Move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID " Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 32/45] x86/compressed/64: Add support for SEV-SNP CPUID table in #VC handlers Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 33/45] x86/boot: Add a pointer to Confidential Computing blob in bootparams Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 34/45] x86/compressed: Add SEV-SNP feature detection/setup Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 35/45] x86/compressed: Use firmware-validated CPUID leaves for SEV-SNP guests Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 36/45] x86/compressed: Export and rename add_identity_map() Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 37/45] x86/compressed/64: Add identity mapping for Confidential Computing blob Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 38/45] x86/sev: Add SEV-SNP feature detection/setup Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 39/45] x86/sev: Use firmware-validated CPUID for SEV-SNP guests Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 40/45] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 41/45] x86/sev: Register SEV-SNP guest request platform device Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 42/45] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 43/45] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 44/45] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report Brijesh Singh
2022-02-09 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 45/45] virt: sevguest: Add documentation for SEV-SNP CPUID Enforcement Brijesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220209181039.1262882-29-brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dovmurik@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=marcorr@google.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tobin@ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).