From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 03/15] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820()
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:35:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220601143515.iavmtysdchirbtel@box.shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9a0eb0a-ce27-5306-a12f-79d196445254@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 11:00:23AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 17.05.22 17:34, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Currently allocate_e820() only interested in the size of map and size of
> > memory descriptor to determine how many e820 entries the kernel needs.
> >
> > UEFI Specification version 2.9 introduces a new memory type --
> > unaccepted memory. To track unaccepted memory kernel needs to allocate
> > a bitmap. The size of the bitmap is dependent on the maximum physical
> > address present in the system. A full memory map is required to find
> > the maximum address.
> >
> > Modify allocate_e820() to get a full memory map.
>
> Usually we use max_pfn, if we want to know the maximum pfn that's
> present in the system (well, IIRC, excluding hotunplug).
>
> How exactly will this (different?) maximum from UEFI for the bitmap
> interact with
>
> max_pfn = e820__end_of_ram_pfn();
>
> from e820 in existing code
>
> ?
I'm not sure I understand the question.
On EFI system, E820 is constructed based on EFI memory map and size of
bitmap calculated based of EFI memmap will always be enough to address all
memory. e820__end_of_ram_pfn() can be smaller than what what we calculate
as size of memory here, if kernel reserve very top of the memory, but it
will never be larger.
Later during the boot we use e820__end_of_ram_pfn() to infer size of
bitmap and it is safe.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 15:34 [PATCHv6 00/15] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 01/15] x86/boot: Centralize __pa()/__va() definitions Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 02/15] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 17:45 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-17 18:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-19 10:43 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-05-19 11:55 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-19 14:33 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-01 8:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 03/15] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-01 9:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-01 14:35 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2022-06-01 14:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-01 14:46 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 04/15] x86/boot: Add infrastructure required for unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 05/15] efi/x86: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 06/15] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 07/15] x86/mm: Reserve unaccepted memory bitmap Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 08/15] x86/mm: Provide helpers for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 09/15] x86/mm: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 10/15] x86/mm: Report unaccepted memory in /proc/meminfo Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-02 8:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 11/15] x86: Disable kexec if system has unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 12/15] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 13/15] x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 14/15] x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-17 15:34 ` [PATCHv6 15/15] mm/vmstat: Add counter for memory accepting Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-01 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-01 14:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220601143515.iavmtysdchirbtel@box.shutemov.name \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=khalid.elmously@canonical.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.cerri@canonical.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=philip.cox@canonical.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=varad.gautam@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).