From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 02/14] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 13:02:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230403100244.4sre7ki4ccusiiul@box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43234108-fa4f-7583-e3b4-2daa2de89fb0@suse.cz>
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 11:26:53AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> # memblock
>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Thanks!
> Just a small suggestion below:
>
> > +
> > +static bool try_to_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
> > +{
> > + long to_accept;
> > + int ret = false;
> > +
> > + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages))
> > + return false;
>
>
> This potentially (depends on what compiler decides) means we'll call this
> function just to skip the static branch. OTOH forcing it as inline would be
> wasteful too. So I'd split that away and make the callers do that static
> branch check inline. Just as deferred_pages_enabled() is used.
Like this?
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 07e16e9b49c4..80fe5e4b6cca 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nr_online_nodes);
static bool page_contains_unaccepted(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
static void accept_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
static bool try_to_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order);
+static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void);
static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page);
int page_group_by_mobility_disabled __read_mostly;
@@ -3464,8 +3465,10 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
gfp_mask)) {
int ret;
- if (try_to_accept_memory(zone, order))
- goto try_this_zone;
+ if (has_unaccepted_memory()) {
+ if (try_to_accept_memory(zone, order))
+ goto try_this_zone;
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
/*
@@ -3519,8 +3522,10 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
return page;
} else {
- if (try_to_accept_memory(zone, order))
- goto try_this_zone;
+ if (has_unaccepted_memory()) {
+ if (try_to_accept_memory(zone, order))
+ goto try_this_zone;
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
/* Try again if zone has deferred pages */
@@ -7302,9 +7307,6 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
long to_accept;
int ret = false;
- if (!static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages))
- return false;
-
/* How much to accept to get to high watermark? */
to_accept = high_wmark_pages(zone) -
(zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES) -
@@ -7321,6 +7323,11 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
return ret;
}
+static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void)
+{
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
+}
+
static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page)
{
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
@@ -7398,6 +7405,11 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
return false;
}
+static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page)
{
BUILD_BUG();
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-03 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 11:49 [PATCHv9 00/14] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 01/14] x86/boot: Centralize __pa()/__va() definitions Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 02/14] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-03 9:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-03 10:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2023-04-03 13:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 03/14] mm/page_alloc: Fake " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-03 13:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-03 14:39 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-03 15:50 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-14 10:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-03 14:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-03 14:47 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 04/14] mm/page_alloc: Add sysfs handle to accept accept_memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-03 13:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-03 14:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 05/14] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 06/14] x86/boot: Add infrastructure required for unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 07/14] efi/x86: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 08/14] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 09/14] x86/mm: Reserve unaccepted memory bitmap Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 10/14] x86/mm: Provide helpers for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 11/14] x86/mm: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into " Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-03 13:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-03 14:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 12/14] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 13/14] x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one() Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-30 11:49 ` [PATCHv9 14/14] x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCHv9 00/14] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-16 19:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-17 7:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230403100244.4sre7ki4ccusiiul@box \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=khalid.elmously@canonical.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.cerri@canonical.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=philip.cox@canonical.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).