From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1643F1FF7BF; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741131835; cv=none; b=WH/yE+AYW5vUBWdh80R0Ir7q8OYMarX9FYykdR1PRFwa0ZNv7PNqymFnzGLmthSjSAEwpOQAXJcGC2WAMJct+Bh8j8odnBr/7GIh2Jrtq5ods6oiLGizWAGYwRMYfD52J5ChP6c7bL7mmSiprXd6TqfYsl5SYwMlDP6Tv54geqE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741131835; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KJTrKAUFeXqKd7gJGLa34anESOCeXSsRQo75HdiIUuc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=XpaLSYNzo88AblanvK3NfjcNDXBuKrRCZI/YjAP6B1JnsffowIrMw57p8xjWTmqdERSqOQdISRXcE6SZaptmXRtUudbe7vVcnpV1QmImvmQVvTCpkDlvEdllJ9LQVmMKkfoimRURC+Ny68uAQa1cbqmSEBG9MpzLmigGqyQlDwY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=n5Dvx1am; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="n5Dvx1am" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3185BC4CEE5; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:43:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1741131834; bh=KJTrKAUFeXqKd7gJGLa34anESOCeXSsRQo75HdiIUuc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n5Dvx1amUKlj7tZ5ib0hANnaD0kL4bR5H++aFlnZlMavfGt2NvSv6biQs+v5UsvXU qTBHf4/fEDaPUrfNWTEj2itQHGutHHiZOgCv7mvYnRX1j2oTx9CSeqItjR3GkL8Kqz 5OpDEIdQBk+dgK8S/UPygPvRVQMGSres/aTiqcsk= Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 15:43:53 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Baoquan He Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , ebiederm@xmission.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Yan Zhao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Accept unaccepted kexec segments' destination addresses Message-Id: <20250304154353.a79c330bffb4d21dce2dad9c@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20241213094930.748-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:12:27 +0800 Baoquan He wrote: > On 01/13/25 at 12:01pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 05:49:30PM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote: > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > This is a repost of the patch "kexec_core: Accept unaccepted kexec > > > destination addresses" [1], rebased to v6.13-rc2. > > > > Can we get this patch applied? > > This looks good to me. In v1, we have analyzed all other possible > solutions, however change in this patch seems the simplest and most > accepatable one. > > If Eric has no objection, maybe Andrew can help pick this into his tree. OK, but that patch is the only thing in the world which is older than me. Yan, can you please refresh, retest and resend? Also, please consolidate the changelogging into a single email - a single-patch series with a coverletter is just weird. Putting the [0/n] info into the singleton patch's changelog is more reader-friendly, and that's what counts, no? Thanks.