From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<aik@amd.com>, <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Introduce pci_walk_bus_reverse(), for_each_pci_dev_reverse()
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 14:06:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729140623.000068a8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250717183358.1332417-4-dan.j.williams@intel.com>
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:33:51 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> PCI/TSM, the PCI core functionality for the PCIe TEE Device Interface
> Security Protocol (TDISP), has a need to walk all subordinate functions of
> a Device Security Manager (DSM) to setup a device security context. A DSM
> is physical function 0 of multi-function or SRIOV device endpoint, or it is
> an upstream switch port.
>
> In error scenarios or when a TEE Security Manager (TSM) device is removed
> it needs to unwind all established DSM contexts.
>
> Introduce reverse versions of PCI device iteration helpers to mirror the
> setup path and ensure that dependent children are handled before parents.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
A couple of trivial comments.
Probably want to +CC Greg KH on next version given bits in drivers/base
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> index 69048869ef1c..d894c87ce1fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
include cleanup.h perhaps for access to guard()?
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/search.c b/drivers/pci/search.c
> index 53840634fbfc..7a4623f65256 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/search.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/search.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,46 @@ static struct pci_dev *pci_get_dev_by_id(const struct pci_device_id *id,
> return pdev;
> }
>
> +static struct pci_dev *pci_get_dev_by_id_reverse(const struct pci_device_id *id,
> + struct pci_dev *from)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct device *dev_start = NULL;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
> +
> + if (from)
> + dev_start = &from->dev;
> + dev = bus_find_device_reverse(&pci_bus_type, dev_start, (void *)id,
> + match_pci_dev_by_id);
> + if (dev)
> + pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> + pci_dev_put(from);
> + return pdev;
> +}
> +
> +enum pci_search_direction {
> + PCI_SEARCH_FORWARD,
> + PCI_SEARCH_REVERSE,
> +};
> +
I don't really care, but given there are only two sane directions maybe
a bool reverse as a parameter to __pci_get_subsys() would be sufficient?
> +static struct pci_dev *__pci_get_subsys(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
> + unsigned int ss_vendor, unsigned int ss_device,
> + struct pci_dev *from, enum pci_search_direction dir)
> +{
> + struct pci_device_id id = {
> + .vendor = vendor,
> + .device = device,
> + .subvendor = ss_vendor,
> + .subdevice = ss_device,
> + };
> +
> + if (dir == PCI_SEARCH_FORWARD)
> + return pci_get_dev_by_id(&id, from);
> + else
> + return pci_get_dev_by_id_reverse(&id, from);
> +}
> +
This file seems to use 1 blank line only between functions.
> +
> /**
> * pci_get_subsys - begin or continue searching for a PCI device by vendor/subvendor/device/subdevice id
> * @vendor: PCI vendor id to match, or %PCI_ANY_ID to match all vendor ids
> @@ -302,14 +342,8 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_get_subsys(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
> unsigned int ss_vendor, unsigned int ss_device,
> struct pci_dev *from)
> {
> - struct pci_device_id id = {
> - .vendor = vendor,
> - .device = device,
> - .subvendor = ss_vendor,
> - .subdevice = ss_device,
> - };
> -
> - return pci_get_dev_by_id(&id, from);
> + return __pci_get_subsys(vendor, device, ss_vendor, ss_device, from,
> + PCI_SEARCH_FORWARD);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_get_subsys);
>
> @@ -334,6 +368,19 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_get_device(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_get_device);
>
> +/*
> + * Same semantics as pci_get_device(), except walks the PCI device list
> + * in reverse discovery order.
> + */
> +struct pci_dev *pci_get_device_reverse(unsigned int vendor,
> + unsigned int device,
> + struct pci_dev *from)
> +{
> + return __pci_get_subsys(vendor, device, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, from,
> + PCI_SEARCH_REVERSE);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_get_device_reverse);
> +
> /**
> * pci_get_class - begin or continue searching for a PCI device by class
> * @class: search for a PCI device with this class designation
> diff --git a/include/linux/device/bus.h b/include/linux/device/bus.h
> index f5a56efd2bd6..99b1002b3e31 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device/bus.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device/bus.h
> @@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ int bus_for_each_dev(const struct bus_type *bus, struct device *start,
> void *data, device_iter_t fn);
> struct device *bus_find_device(const struct bus_type *bus, struct device *start,
> const void *data, device_match_t match);
> +struct device *bus_find_device_reverse(const struct bus_type *bus,
> + struct device *start, const void *data,
> + device_match_t match);
> /**
> * bus_find_device_by_name - device iterator for locating a particular device
> * of a specific name.
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 3fac811376b5..b8bca0711967 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -575,6 +575,8 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus *bus);
>
> #define to_pci_dev(n) container_of(n, struct pci_dev, dev)
> #define for_each_pci_dev(d) while ((d = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, d)) != NULL)
> +#define for_each_pci_dev_reverse(d) \
> + while ((d = pci_get_device_reverse(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, d)) != NULL)
>
> static inline int pci_channel_offline(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> @@ -1220,6 +1222,8 @@ u64 pci_get_dsn(struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> struct pci_dev *pci_get_device(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
> struct pci_dev *from);
> +struct pci_dev *pci_get_device_reverse(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
> + struct pci_dev *from);
> struct pci_dev *pci_get_subsys(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
> unsigned int ss_vendor, unsigned int ss_device,
> struct pci_dev *from);
> @@ -1639,6 +1643,8 @@ int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, int max,
>
> void pci_walk_bus(struct pci_bus *top, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
> void *userdata);
> +void pci_walk_bus_reverse(struct pci_bus *top,
> + int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *), void *userdata);
> int pci_cfg_space_size(struct pci_dev *dev);
> unsigned char pci_bus_max_busnr(struct pci_bus *bus);
> resource_size_t pcibios_window_alignment(struct pci_bus *bus,
> @@ -2031,6 +2037,11 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_device(unsigned int vendor,
> struct pci_dev *from)
> { return NULL; }
>
> +static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_device_reverse(unsigned int vendor,
> + unsigned int device,
> + struct pci_dev *from)
> +{ return NULL; }
> +
> static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_subsys(unsigned int vendor,
> unsigned int device,
> unsigned int ss_vendor,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-17 18:33 [PATCH v4 00/10] PCI/TSM: Core infrastructure for PCI device security (TDISP) Dan Williams
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] coco/tsm: Introduce a core device for TEE Security Managers Dan Williams
2025-07-29 11:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI/IDE: Enumerate Selective Stream IDE capabilities Dan Williams
2025-07-29 12:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 20:59 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 20:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-07 22:37 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-08 2:17 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-08 15:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-07 22:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Introduce pci_walk_bus_reverse(), for_each_pci_dev_reverse() Dan Williams
2025-07-29 13:06 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-08-05 23:52 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-06 10:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07 20:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-07 23:17 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 23:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] PCI/TSM: Authenticate devices via platform TSM Dan Williams
2025-07-29 14:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 1:35 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-06 11:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 23:16 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 10:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07 2:35 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-05 15:53 ` Xu Yilun
2025-08-06 22:30 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 21:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-08 22:51 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-13 2:57 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-14 1:40 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-14 14:52 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-18 21:08 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] samples/devsec: Introduce a PCI device-security bus + endpoint sample Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 3:20 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-06 11:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 18:33 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-11 13:18 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2025-08-11 20:47 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 21:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-08 23:45 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] PCI: Add PCIe Device 3 Extended Capability enumeration Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 21:00 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-06 21:02 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-09 0:05 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] PCI/IDE: Add IDE establishment helpers Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 21:40 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-09 1:52 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-08 10:21 ` Arto Merilainen
2025-08-08 17:26 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-11 8:02 ` Arto Merilainen
2025-08-28 8:19 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] PCI/IDE: Report available IDE streams Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07 22:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] PCI/TSM: Report active " Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 21:55 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] samples/devsec: Add sample IDE establishment Dan Williams
2025-07-29 16:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-18 10:57 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] PCI/TSM: Core infrastructure for PCI device security (TDISP) Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250729140623.000068a8@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).