From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
aik@amd.com, lukas@wunner.de, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/38] tsm: Don't overload connect
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 17:00:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250804220005.GA3644473@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250728135216.48084-6-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Only touches drivers/pci, so needs a "PCI" prefix of some flavor.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 07:21:42PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> We need separate handling in the guest while destroying the device.
> Hence switch to new callback lock and unlock. Hide the connect sysfs
> file in guest.
>
> guest sysfs will now looks like
s/guest/Guest/
s/will now looks/will now look/
> ls -al /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:02:00.0/tsm/
> total 0
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 1 00:00 .
> drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 0 Jan 1 00:00 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jan 1 00:00 accept
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jan 1 00:00 lock
Indent quoted material a couple spaces.
I don't know about TSM, so this commit log doesn't quite tell me why
we need this.
It appears this also adds a sysfs file that could be documented
somehow.
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/tsm.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/pci-tsm.h | 3 +
> 2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/tsm.c b/drivers/pci/tsm.c
> index 60f50d57a725..80607082b7f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/tsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/tsm.c
> @@ -125,18 +125,6 @@ static int pci_tsm_disconnect(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * TDISP locked state temporarily makes the device inaccessible, do not
> - * surprise live attached drivers
> - */
> -static int __driver_idle_connect(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> -{
> - guard(device)(&pdev->dev);
> - if (pdev->dev.driver)
> - return -EBUSY;
> - return tsm_ops->connect(pdev);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * When the registered ops support accept it indicates that this is a
> * TVM-side (guest) TSM operations structure. In this mode ->connect()
> @@ -162,10 +150,7 @@ static int pci_tsm_connect(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if (tsm->state >= PCI_TSM_CONNECT)
> return 0;
>
> - if (tvm_mode())
> - rc = __driver_idle_connect(pdev);
> - else
> - rc = tsm_ops->connect(pdev);
> + rc = tsm_ops->connect(pdev);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> tsm->state = PCI_TSM_CONNECT;
> @@ -299,6 +284,99 @@ static ssize_t accept_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(accept);
>
> +static int pci_tsm_unlock(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pci_tsm_pf0 *tsm = to_pci_tsm_pf0(pdev->tsm);
> +
Drop this blank line ...
> + struct mutex *lock __free(tsm_ops_unlock) = tsm_ops_lock(tsm);
add one here. I'm seeing a new pattern; maybe the trend is to put
declarations of __free() things outside the usual local variable list?
> + if (!lock)
> + return -EINTR;
> +
> + if (tsm->state < PCI_TSM_INIT)
> + return -ENXIO;
> + if (tsm->state < PCI_TSM_LOCK)
> + return 0;
> +
> + tsm_ops->unlock(pdev);
> + tsm->state = PCI_TSM_INIT;
> + pdev->dev.tdi_enabled = false;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * TDISP locked state temporarily makes the device inaccessible, do not
> + * surprise live attached drivers
> + */
> +static int __driver_idle_lock(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + guard(device)(&pdev->dev);
> + if (pdev->dev.driver)
> + return -EBUSY;
> + return tsm_ops->lock(pdev);
> +}
> +
> +static int pci_tsm_lock(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pci_tsm_pf0 *tsm = to_pci_tsm_pf0(pdev->tsm);
> + int rc;
> +
> + struct mutex *lock __free(tsm_ops_unlock) = tsm_ops_lock(tsm);
> + if (!lock)
> + return -EINTR;
> +
> + if (tsm->state < PCI_TSM_INIT)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + rc = __driver_idle_lock(pdev);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> + tsm->state = PCI_TSM_CONNECT;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t lock_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + bool connect;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> + rc = kstrtobool(buf, &connect);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + struct rw_semaphore *lock __free(tsm_read_unlock) = tsm_read_lock();
> + if (!lock)
> + return -EINTR;
> +
> + if (connect)
> + rc = pci_tsm_lock(pdev);
> + else
> + rc = pci_tsm_unlock(pdev);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> + return len;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t lock_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> + struct pci_tsm_pf0 *tsm;
> +
> + struct rw_semaphore *lock __free(tsm_read_unlock) = tsm_read_lock();
> + if (!lock)
> + return -EINTR;
> +
> + if (!pdev->tsm)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + tsm = to_pci_tsm_pf0(pdev->tsm);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", tsm->state >= PCI_TSM_LOCK);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(lock);
> +
> static umode_t pci_tsm_pf0_attr_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct attribute *a, int n)
> {
> @@ -306,6 +384,11 @@ static umode_t pci_tsm_pf0_attr_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> /* Host context, filter out guest only attributes */
> if (a == &dev_attr_accept.attr)
> return 0;
> + if (a == &dev_attr_lock.attr)
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + if (a == &dev_attr_connect.attr)
> + return 0;
> }
>
> return a->mode;
> @@ -325,6 +408,7 @@ DEFINE_SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBLE(pci_tsm_pf0);
> static struct attribute *pci_tsm_pf0_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_connect.attr,
> &dev_attr_accept.attr,
> + &dev_attr_lock.attr,
> NULL
> };
>
> @@ -537,7 +621,8 @@ static void pci_tsm_pf0_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return;
>
> pdev->tsm = no_free_ptr(pci_tsm);
> - sysfs_update_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &pci_tsm_auth_attr_group);
> + if (!tvm_mode())
> + sysfs_update_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &pci_tsm_auth_attr_group);
> sysfs_update_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &pci_tsm_pf0_attr_group);
> if (pci_tsm_owner_attr_group)
> sysfs_merge_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, pci_tsm_owner_attr_group);
> @@ -602,6 +687,19 @@ static void pci_tsm_pf0_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> __pci_tsm_pf0_destroy(tsm);
> }
>
> +static void pci_tsm_guest_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pci_tsm_pf0 *tsm = to_pci_tsm_pf0(pdev->tsm);
> +
> + if (tsm->state > PCI_TSM_INIT)
> + pci_tsm_unlock(pdev);
> + pdev->tsm = NULL;
> + if (pci_tsm_owner_attr_group)
> + sysfs_unmerge_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, pci_tsm_owner_attr_group);
> + sysfs_update_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &pci_tsm_pf0_attr_group);
> + __pci_tsm_pf0_destroy(tsm);
> +}
> +
> static void __pci_tsm_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct pci_tsm *pci_tsm = pdev->tsm;
> @@ -611,7 +709,9 @@ static void __pci_tsm_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> lockdep_assert_held_write(&pci_tsm_rwsem);
>
> - if (is_pci_tsm_pf0(pdev)) {
> + if (tvm_mode()) {
> + pci_tsm_guest_destroy(pdev);
> + } else if (is_pci_tsm_pf0(pdev)) {
> pci_tsm_pf0_destroy(pdev);
> } else {
> __pci_tsm_unbind(pdev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-tsm.h b/include/linux/pci-tsm.h
> index 0d4303726b25..7639e7963681 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-tsm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-tsm.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ enum pci_tsm_state {
> PCI_TSM_ERR = -1,
> PCI_TSM_INIT,
> PCI_TSM_CONNECT,
> + PCI_TSM_LOCK,
> PCI_TSM_ACCEPT,
> };
>
> @@ -153,6 +154,8 @@ struct pci_tsm_ops {
> void (*remove)(struct pci_tsm *tsm);
> int (*connect)(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> void (*disconnect)(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> + int (*lock)(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> + void (*unlock)(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> struct pci_tdi *(*bind)(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_dev *pf0_dev,
> struct kvm *kvm, u64 tdi_id);
> void (*unbind)(struct pci_tdi *tdi);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-04 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 188+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-28 13:51 [RFC PATCH v1 00/38] ARM CCA Device Assignment support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/38] tsm: Add tsm_bind/unbind helpers Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/38] tsm: Move tsm core outside the host directory Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/38] tsm: Move dsm_dev from pci_tdi to pci_tsm Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-08-04 21:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-05 9:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/38] tsm: Support DMA Allocation from private memory Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 14:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-29 8:23 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-29 14:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-30 10:09 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-31 12:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-31 13:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-31 16:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-01 9:30 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-08-01 14:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-02 8:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-02 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-04 6:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-05 15:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 10:22 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-05 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-04 21:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-15 8:36 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-16 4:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-09-16 8:16 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/38] tsm: Don't overload connect Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-08-04 22:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/38] iommufd: Add and option to request for bar mapping with IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 14:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-29 8:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-29 14:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-30 6:55 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-31 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 2:26 ` Xu Yilun
2025-08-05 16:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-30 6:43 ` Xu Yilun
2025-08-06 21:18 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/38] iommufd/viommu: Add support to associate viommu with kvm instance Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-29 8:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-29 16:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 23:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/38] iommufd/tsm: Add tsm_op iommufd ioctls Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-29 16:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-02 9:03 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-04 22:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/38] iommufd/vdevice: Add TSM Guest request uAPI Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-08-04 22:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/38] iommufd/vdevice: Add TSM map ioctl Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 14:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-29 8:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-29 14:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-04 2:32 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-04 8:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-05 1:29 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-05 15:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/38] KVM: arm64: CCA: register host tsm platform device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-29 17:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 23:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-30 8:42 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-30 10:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-30 12:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-30 13:07 ` Greg KH
2025-10-10 12:10 ` Jeremy Linton
2025-10-10 12:38 ` Greg KH
2025-10-10 15:14 ` Jeremy Linton
2025-10-10 13:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-10 15:28 ` Jeremy Linton
2025-10-10 15:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-10 15:37 ` Greg KH
2025-10-10 15:50 ` Jeremy Linton
2025-10-10 18:44 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-10 22:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-13 20:42 ` Jeremy Linton
2025-10-15 9:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-10-15 9:58 ` Greg KH
2025-10-15 11:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-15 11:57 ` Greg KH
2025-10-15 12:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-15 12:37 ` Greg KH
2025-10-15 15:19 ` James Bottomley
2025-10-15 16:03 ` Greg KH
2025-10-15 16:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-31 12:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-31 13:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-31 16:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-01 8:31 ` Greg KH
2025-08-02 0:54 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-09 7:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/38] coco: host: arm64: CCA host platform device driver Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-29 17:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 23:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-30 10:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-31 12:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-30 8:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-30 10:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/38] coco: host: arm64: Create a PDEV with rmm Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 12:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-02 10:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-31 11:47 ` Arto Merilainen
2025-08-02 10:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-04 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/38] coco: host: arm64: Device communication support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 13:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-31 12:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-04 4:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-04 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/38] coco: host: arm64: Stop and destroy the physical device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 13:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-04 4:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/38] X.509: Make certificate parser public Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/38] X.509: Parse Subject Alternative Name in certificates Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/38] X.509: Move certificate length retrieval into new helper Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-08-04 22:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/38] coco: host: arm64: set_pubkey support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-04 4:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-04 22:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/38] coco: host: arm64: Add support for creating a virtual device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/38] coco: host: arm64: Add support for virtual device communication Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-04 4:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-28 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/38] coco: host: arm64: Stop and destroy virtual device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/38] coco: guest: arm64: Update arm CCA guest driver Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-31 12:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-31 13:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/38] arm64: CCA: Register guest tsm callback Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-04 4:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/38] cca: guest: arm64: Realm device lock support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 26/38] KVM: arm64: Add exit handler related to device assignment Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 27/38] coco: host: arm64: add RSI_RDEV_GET_INSTANCE_ID related exit handler Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 28/38] coco: host: arm64: Add support for device communication " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 29/38] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for collecting interface reports Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 30/38] coco: host: arm64: Add support for realm host interface (RHI) Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 31/38] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for fetching interface report and certificate chain from host Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 32/38] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for guest initiated TDI bind/unbind Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 14:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-04 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 33/38] KVM: arm64: CCA: handle dev mem map/unmap Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 34/38] coco: guest: arm64: Validate mmio range found in the interface report Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-30 15:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-31 11:39 ` Arto Merilainen
2025-07-31 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-04 6:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-04 8:27 ` Arto Merilainen
2025-09-10 5:47 ` Arto Merilainen
2025-09-10 14:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-11 5:33 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-09-11 8:31 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-11 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-11 17:47 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-04 22:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 35/38] coco: guest: arm64: Add Realm device start and stop support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-31 10:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-04 22:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 36/38] KVM: arm64: CCA: enable DA in realm create parameters Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-08-04 22:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 37/38] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for fetching device measurements Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-31 10:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-04 22:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-28 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 38/38] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for fetching device info Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-07-31 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-04 6:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-04 10:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-08 23:37 ` Eric Biggers
2025-07-30 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/38] ARM CCA Device Assignment support Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-01 2:07 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-01 15:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-01 21:19 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-02 14:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-02 23:50 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-03 22:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 5:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-08-05 17:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 18:27 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-05 18:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 19:06 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-05 19:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 4:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250804220005.GA3644473@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox