From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5D627A93C for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 02:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759287292; cv=none; b=DOQbLupVWtchkqoxtf2/g6e5xSvCFEhMWVHBfQCe8vBSJszZ5dgewzPS1yIWlBkFthVpdJKowWSMV4XrBCFiS9mZuq5bWcXLKECkk45pOyDUN2JR73r1XOb80wHo18fd82Qcu18ZZHOEVPIy7vDiZbjXoi06VbZkYlJLrlWJlnk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759287292; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yzXsG45V6hDY5JoOy9A7+02aECqQ79Pt6rGJt6bu3fw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=hh9qwXTv85ULJEycMmXDf55b6QTiK9gzssbuGA9o/PmKqifOFWqiYhBlPLlT585GHh61x04jnE4Mwy5mz7jpwCaXekxOF+QkFjoEF9bdGCeICsV3hpySCmyxTjXG6JMrH0nidLfsNXXljJ9zo2DiFYTf+i/ycYIYID1BoWCcAfo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NaH+9oQc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NaH+9oQc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1759287291; x=1790823291; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yzXsG45V6hDY5JoOy9A7+02aECqQ79Pt6rGJt6bu3fw=; b=NaH+9oQcWhD1jpDbg/kSGH+PJKb1wB7xEvMdGRTpl9RT+WLRjLsagqWV ohyYzwTVjQmG6eQofvSB8y50BxE1UR6/JqFhj7Z9LO7IMrO7gMZVNwfp6 DYvrktmcLllVWPZdzeCRyd91X29HLoeluGnzkXn7zl7jJh3+uR7utCBK1 PeITrlvQXvq/daN1reDdIUmLwuflHHQ90qgI+BXz1pXzmZ6gzrFuQASrC SoWSJHKnzKVBzwoUQlikJa5wTnJ+qcJUmSvY1/8OgkzvC3qvfVEiaa24g WGVFLX256S9oVwtu8vN/kp3pX/wXpcUNvtvOTdfzJIC3ZcdXrVMSAqZZl w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0TSfF3rFQymrFf+6EZ4xDg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: M5nvfQg6TOiNWOfeMA9Q7g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11569"; a="61662200" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,305,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="61662200" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2025 19:54:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Svg5KCFMQYy8fx0wjCFHbg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: azAPzeZzTNKGpMY4cQfWfA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,305,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="178629025" Received: from 984fee019967.jf.intel.com ([10.165.54.94]) by fmviesa006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2025 19:54:48 -0700 From: Chao Gao To: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, reinette.chatre@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, yilun.xu@linux.intel.com, sagis@google.com, vannapurve@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org, nik.borisov@suse.com Cc: Chao Gao , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Farrah Chen , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: [PATCH v2 01/21] x86/virt/tdx: Print SEAMCALL leaf numbers in decimal Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 19:52:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20251001025442.427697-2-chao.gao@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20251001025442.427697-1-chao.gao@intel.com> References: <20251001025442.427697-1-chao.gao@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Both TDX spec and kernel defines SEAMCALL leaf numbers as decimal. Printing them in hex makes no sense. Correct it. Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Signed-off-by: Chao Gao Tested-by: Farrah Chen Reviewed-by: Kai Huang --- v2: - print leaf numbers with %llu --- arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c index ada2fd4c2d54..e406edd28687 100644 --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ typedef void (*sc_err_func_t)(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args); static inline void seamcall_err(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args) { - pr_err("SEAMCALL (0x%016llx) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err); + pr_err("SEAMCALL (%llu) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err); } static inline void seamcall_err_ret(u64 fn, u64 err, -- 2.47.3