From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com (mail-qk1-f180.google.com [209.85.222.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7371DC198 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770727440; cv=none; b=BaO8+rgeYEqcwB5va3+psVmcXartNxGkfk4Q5kNKFDRSOFpjwe255kzeNkMRjSObRkc2/VVBMsORBGax774f061nsb6aXbATQrDe32G+/n+An1GeQPZhiqtSEEmbOyXVnAeV5aR/lT8e3ojbYroBY3aVxBwYsz/3+MR92Q9oIf4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770727440; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xonj/+koAdun2zKMmTEgycmII1nNMKC1m2Fb9Sy9enE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kD0J/CrcXhekQPVWkw8FWtIWf1qZNSplA1dIO/2Bb43YxwF3QFE31UITnqFewsd0c3p/HMPAdyicAMXJ8jNqteux6o7KLMmu60Gv3sKvK6g0jZeg8swI+xFUiYqL7q26X3iUVv44/bD2VMx0Cue/CbhJTMzH6fGxL9KlUjdkGVk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziepe.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b=kbA4nn+f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="kbA4nn+f" Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8c533228383so48770385a.3 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 04:43:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; t=1770727438; x=1771332238; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N5ebXMgdbEnP2n7MqO77VYCN9M2l8thAEykxr97Y/HU=; b=kbA4nn+fum5ZXp23MLDiJ4ZZY0SQscENZhB0Dc8mZ8zlU3aLb7q3SrGrlAWjvOCQDp WD1ZrcIEZO69h6dKJbBADzvNFftiYSuOp2Ie3ENuNsWx8E6H8cj801h1sS8jyrK0ut9Z PzYuKm5ZL+REB8bL7g2eUK2i1NVwEHRvT4cKNxovS7A0WGwJfPV1LAU9ujd+ApJokpBI 52vBcxn1uCmERjefVYewVgw4EXb0P/ptW1eN6G5DlbQKcK2NYhMWJYFp3IePPRbrGPC8 Bcq7JkHnzK/mWMUpXCTogWNfKbxcr1ZASioWBu0PtwweOj0/74gwO1xKraWP5EESS8oa +4xA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1770727438; x=1771332238; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N5ebXMgdbEnP2n7MqO77VYCN9M2l8thAEykxr97Y/HU=; b=MQvsMjjnWeAcRpj0SB/qcy6jvVBk0/eF1SUTNTmjePcFSiHnX/bwIeb82ZEyRM2DcB kQER5caJAzi2yPSzGXsDZQYbtGSbyKHxGICOgW6HeDPAj0zGOP8VSDO5xSZyQ+VH6l6h FOF3jrFUvcADyLef7rgxtwU7MU80r1eQ/YZIq7wqvAKvJtpYoJRTNZcksjQDUE4so6J5 VHn8UmaAbkIPykoFOLPiSdsbeDPfgrH2SOqg4TgWh/SOEH+wgNSBz756iZzC58fE8ABS 1jXoAyPYKVVVMTb5GyHb+OzOsL6AzZVUWdqrYUAuXh2YOPTR2T5xdlYpM1sEd9G4/Ot0 db9w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW1x8qutugjSBiGBxR/Vw3DMr9qcCibnwvWXHtBT2KkHIBNmrC7PbV4/+gVurD2fwIQ8QCFXziCfoli@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZQSHTIRBP4/fiI0NiDfO6Y1Bs8OjbZEmmYXW7bjXIiUbz87v5 1m0pymP0OOTiqdli9RkPgUxjCws3CZhDox9LA7sq8gpn914SUM4SYlvUkv6rsI8KvK0= X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aK7wViiMZH5uqVQDDIdHJzzq/rJM9n1KAy+JjMUsbtVNDFn8K77Ww5ThrZ7H8G LMPPbwyQw7wrmbnCNDBxfch4lCeiWAsWskM8cVDf9YvE13sW1V335/+T0TS5iWkYDWJwiZAFlvd 5CCD3+oLHRTkoWM7YQY6bB2FoqEASZDsqzKGkcGr/SF2/TM0aW0gHUiB7uS3vULF89rsaUeVOMD uQkWy4HgYlu02rTQrGCkaO+lvq11fTeL2g+YdGKhDNz9icQiK7QDavRD9ZvkKT+wsjO6nJUrINC f2E03J0Vxa6qI0grJwa8W5XflrHe5AA/cI/lXyIS7soNWlnAHrn2mxYpPFGa5Yq9aOH7Err4F0G fVyE4gi+txwSD4jBbw9xWu7sndCisxraP31rFnTPGmLaS/q3dxlgTsQ5HSEltqKFtllUtpXQ8QU wal5hqvNyDw2jur6ULGQ9WXHtgpXXZJPQfyX32jRv2D/0IUFsavRrEHhehhXnx4ZM+RIeqohFMp QshcJU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:40c7:b0:8ca:55:ac60 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8caf16ec83amr1829777785a.78.1770727438524; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 04:43:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-162-112-119.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.162.112.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-8caf9ee8593sm1019180385a.36.2026.02.10.04.43.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Feb 2026 04:43:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by wakko with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1vpn5x-0000000315A-13dh; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:43:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:43:57 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Jiri Pirko Cc: John Stultz , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, sumit.semwal@linaro.org, benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com, Brian.Starkey@arm.com, tjmercier@google.com, christian.koenig@amd.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, leon@kernel.org, sean.anderson@linux.dev, ptesarik@suse.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, steven.price@arm.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dma-buf: heaps: allow heap to specify valid heap flags Message-ID: <20260210124357.GD943673@ziepe.ca> References: <20260209153809.250835-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20260209153809.250835-5-jiri@resnulli.us> <20260210002927.GC943673@ziepe.ca> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:14:08AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >I'd advocate that the right design is for userspace to positively > >signal via this flag that it wants/accepts shared memory and without > >the flag shared memory should never be returned. > > We can have the same behaviour with the separate heap, can't we? > Userpace positively signals it wants/accepts the shared memory by > choosing "system_cc_decrypted" heap name. So what do the other heap names do? Always private? Do you ever get heaps that are unknowably private or shared (eg MMIO backed?) Jason