From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk2-f41.google.com (mail-qk2-f41.google.com [74.125.230.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3DA51AECB for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.230.233 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789750400; cv=none; b=WXfZkZ9AGJyT9deDd+Ec49WVwxT7oGQWfqlSbIX5Znl3ooYKpEqIeHA8azt+O4+X97K/EBFgnerbz9e3ahGP9mfcvLIY6OO2xfZRBmdwkV9M4+ily/cAUU70nWZb9WiqVLUfxH0AVcMO1C/wh1Jqryi6y9KCO6dufTUJ7rzx5TU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789750400; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QHr3HItRfGIiXW33vm4AJyjNNIRgLrxwO2wwjz3RPCc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jdoKsTa+9NwC2UVB73322rV8P+Om6ZNTmaB0EqGA53wUavNBv1DugCmrC8gfKEwQCWklDQX6v4SeqtqlJzJG2E+xEIhiyUlEknMvwWJFrILkw3NVeRVOJClFOPR9BfRILAWYUmDL2185dB0Cpp4CUa7esJDZy7Gt4nBSCd2PihA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziepe.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b=pB5gO3mD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.230.233 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="pB5gO3mD" Received: by mail-qk2-f41.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-93910ad2273so121546285a.0 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:53:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; t=1789750397; x=1790355197; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=xZHhNZflcpTf7gpMtfLnrd+b6TKn7wbbrgvwwdWjf0M=; b=pB5gO3mDN1zFng2UzRAaAMcg/2DgorsFsoNSlY0HwOHCNY9m48jA8HES6C7+/vXb5N DEvZIgK/Z8/xT20/4l4SYZEcR1CjIBD8UR7OuFVyZhFY6yLmPk7dxfJ8q6j7Zj6VODth wgJKkG5W9G6pvSt2k464qwAvMBnwq5DvPQvivZ7V2oi22nbuhYmfgb4/7LeLu1mgh0JK oVX9ZLI+gt9evdOM/191RE8UlhxDDURPCvswkLwctcAsGLPar8d7y5SkzWNDZ6xsbJ7a 6N8BR3UXZfs/9zdo9y1Uk6o0/ZbGFfmoPVXxqYoOJaENm3PXB+vE/SC+kUtg1SCmeeOc BXpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1789750397; x=1790355197; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=xZHhNZflcpTf7gpMtfLnrd+b6TKn7wbbrgvwwdWjf0M=; b=xGRUjqICutqEW6Qs+KM6uTAb4WV3f9l/C6Ulhg13eCOcGKAPNvXAlioyHfwj/yUA0m /LX1zkesrth/5gFr3aS7TQoGN13dv2h+8Picbo3BZpITXx9lAOAt/GOog1MRXKrH/uNg xdIR1RRyhAxw0V+SO6xrbRaeD0pSXwtsAegV5M6BcyBdEY2WsXB53+1mrEwsih4nNSUs mYBtrrcEk4c+7nOt4xkSgruV2o2xc098dGJy74g9lCtF0rL5BA+xgoTTBip6uAjp3Gp5 SdOYzDxYcgf5L54AGK5HkFo5lGaR0NTaarPd0VzKdrbhwXCN6VEX5IJTJk3uWvSltoqk eQUw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBx5ilEvBRSilOgZyBo5Koqr1O9AAZwHLmzRxID6KyrRIK7UI+0BVzojAvt8H1HM9uEN+B/uPBmiEC8A@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++kgDEyXr1pmxoeteth1xkAaOTm2q0APZ1xQufoNwRrzpgKOjY81 nboOuXZpG1dPvxEbl81LAr/riKQPvbRuy08+Mzk8hdadbhLdNc9/jLPhshF1O1Vbot4= X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou01CIcMH6QMpKn2RgsfbZvCa9pYMgagEgVNoOL97qtuecazFu3NAtRdCVeNfqR zjEO81e42h8NZnH7uvxocGLljHPi4763IysDx1UyxAKFCnH2nfKnQfEY6qfqlqDmLVgm6hTYEAx +T7CvH7E2HAIy0eLlB3+1WwLm8WPTxCfVH55aow7/aDgmu6m9qQfZ8LHgITXyN0TfrWMdy3PdAq zBr4DYWo3GwrYdDx83GmSsSpx6riZHJeOdvAgtU7OHEiVkPu8vXqUSz3ayGD19LR6N4KsGNasFj p2S7ITkHjhu2gdWVRQhUm7nKKoN9Xkh5fFCX3WhTyRPK25B/TryNTdhvWHABDzYpaYMIGDu32r4 R3Xhcabkx9FboMBRDNaBbAnn8aoo6GE24/io3M3uBDJm/cpv2L2hTm1tjZpxNGM87G5gvIk+3ym SCgNbUcWCMrW9N7HVXh5SEJQc9usa1mAeMlALub7aEIq8cKxqoHXOUksjs+eOjc8nQIHmVoTYcI wG+E0UoWLpLsFdp64WrwiB3BVHwl4aQCopEyVY8ot4eN5b5Si21Z37g X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a17:b0:939:ee44:36bf with SMTP id af79cd13be357-93bdc72000dmr495588285a.29.1789750396680; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns010zw-159-2-239-150.pppoe-dynamic.high-speed.ns.bellaliant.net. [159.2.239.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-91260a60f21sm68476d6.19.2026.09.18.09.53.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by wakko with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1x7bpr-00000001yyx-21Yo; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:53:15 -0300 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:53:15 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Christian =?utf-8?B?S8O2bmln?= Cc: Catalin Marinas , "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" , linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Steven Price , Suzuki K Poulose , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , Sumit Semwal , "T.J. Mercier" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/9] dma-buf: system_heap: Enforce shared-granule alignment for cc-shared buffers Message-ID: <20260918165315.GF11599@ziepe.ca> References: <97c30fce-9bda-4c61-b1b9-10297b89c8d9@amd.com> <20260918153642.GD11599@ziepe.ca> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 05:39:55PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Arch code can figure out how to do it. If some ARM configs only give > > order 4 folios or whatever then dmabuf heap doesn't care. > > The fundamental problem is that DMA allocations are highly > architecture and device specific while Linux memory allocation APIs > are generic. This isn't a dma allocation, this is a memory allocation. We made things so the CC shared folios are DMA mappable through the DMA API. From the heap perspective the only difference is passing an additional DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED when DMA mapping the folio. Jason