From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
seanjc@google.com, peterz@infradead.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
ardb@kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com, Michael.Roth@amd.com,
KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com, Tycho.Andersen@amd.com,
Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com, jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com,
rientjes@google.com, jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com,
darwi@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 14:32:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ef6cf92-3c84-43f6-a17e-cf9d5a026167@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23267200-9fed-43a9-a28b-a6daa701159b@intel.com>
Hello Dave,
On 3/30/2026 6:33 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> +int snp_perform_rmp_optimization(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (!(rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> This seems wrong. How about we just make 'X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT' the one
> true source of RMP support?
>
> If you don't have CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP you:
>
> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT)
>
> Ditto for MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED.
>
> It could also potentially replace the 'rmpopt_wq' checks.
>
Following up on this ...
It is straightforward to clear X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT if the RMPOPT setup
function (that is, configure and enable RMPOPT function) gets called, but
if CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP is not set, then __sev_snp_init_locked() (CCP module)
does not invoke the RMPOPT setup function.
And then as this function snp_perform_rmp_optimization() is an external
API, it needs to check for both CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP and MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED.
Otherwise, we will need to clear X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT, wherever CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP
is cleared all across call sites like the AMD IOMMU driver,
AMD SVM-SEV command line parsing support code and AMD CPU detection and BSP init
code.
And for clearing X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT, if MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED is not set,
the support will need to be added in setup_rmptable().
It is much more straightforward to check for both CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP and
MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED in this API function itself.
Thanks,
Ashish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1774755884.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>
2026-03-30 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_AMD_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-03-30 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/sev: Add support for enabling RMPOPT Ashish Kalra
2026-03-30 22:38 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-30 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-03-30 23:22 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-31 0:46 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-04-01 15:47 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-04-01 16:10 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-30 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-03-30 23:33 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-31 0:54 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-04-08 19:32 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2026-04-08 19:45 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-30 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
2026-03-30 23:47 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-30 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/sev: Add debugfs support for RMPOPT Ashish Kalra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ef6cf92-3c84-43f6-a17e-cf9d5a026167@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox