From: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
erdemaktas@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com, jxgao@google.com,
sagis@google.com, oupton@google.com, peterx@redhat.com,
vkuznets@redhat.com, dmatlack@google.com, pgonda@google.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev, corbet@lwn.net,
hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 5/5] x86: CVMs: Ensure that memory conversions happen at 2M alignment
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 09:00:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3313c886-e964-48c3-8277-b47cb1955de9@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGtprH8r0kYYqGoumsVeZq42cX8CN3cchkuRYhQULqtb-1nKww@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/02/2024 06:08, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:32 PM Jeremi Piotrowski
> <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 01/02/2024 04:46, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:03 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/11/24 21:52, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
>>>>> @@ -2133,8 +2133,10 @@ static int __set_memory_enc_pgtable(unsigned long addr, int numpages, bool enc)
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Should not be working on unaligned addresses */
>>>>> - if (WARN_ONCE(addr & ~PAGE_MASK, "misaligned address: %#lx\n", addr))
>>>>> - addr &= PAGE_MASK;
>>>>> + if (WARN_ONCE(addr & ~HPAGE_MASK, "misaligned address: %#lx\n", addr)
>>>>> + || WARN_ONCE((numpages << PAGE_SHIFT) & ~HPAGE_MASK,
>>>>> + "misaligned numpages: %#lx\n", numpages))
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> This series is talking about swiotlb and DMA, then this applies a
>>>> restriction to what I *thought* was a much more generic function:
>>>> __set_memory_enc_pgtable(). What prevents this function from getting
>>>> used on 4k mappings?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The end goal here is to limit the conversion granularity to hugepage
>>> sizes. SWIOTLB allocations are the major source of unaligned
>>> allocations(and so the conversions) that need to be fixed before
>>> achieving this goal.
>>>
>>> This change will ensure that conversion fails for unaligned ranges, as
>>> I don't foresee the need for 4K aligned conversions apart from DMA
>>> allocations.
>>
>> Hi Vishal,
>>
>> This assumption is wrong. set_memory_decrypted is called from various
>> parts of the kernel: kexec, sev-guest, kvmclock, hyperv code. These conversions
>> are for non-DMA allocations that need to be done at 4KB granularity
>> because the data structures in question are page sized.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeremi
>
> Thanks Jeremi for pointing out these usecases.
>
> My brief analysis for these call sites:
> 1) machine_kexec_64.c, realmode/init.c, kvm/mmu/mmu.c - shared memory
> allocation/conversion happens when host side memory encryption
> (CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT) is enabled.
> 2) kernel/kvmclock.c - Shared memory allocation can be made to align
> 2M even if the memory needed is lesser.
> 3) drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c,
> drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c - Shared memory allocation can
> be made to align 2M even if the memory needed is lesser.
>
> I admit I haven't analyzed hyperv code in context of these changes,
> but will take a better look to see if the calls for memory conversion
> here can fit the category of "Shared memory allocation can be made to
> align 2M even if the memory needed is lesser".
>
> Agree that this patch should be modified to look something like
> (subject to more changes on the call sites)
No, this patch is still built on the wrong assumptions. You're trying
to alter a generic function in the guest for the constraints of a very
specific hypervisor + host userspace + memory backend combination.
That's not right.
Is the numpages check supposed to ensure that the guest *only* toggles
visibility in chunks of 2MB? Then you're exposing more memory to the host
than the guest intends.
If you must - focus on getting swiotlb conversions to happen at the desired
granularity but don't try to force every single conversion to be >4K.
Thanks,
Jeremi
>
> =============
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> index e9b448d1b1b7..8c608d6913c4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> @@ -2132,10 +2132,15 @@ static int __set_memory_enc_pgtable(unsigned
> long addr, int numpages, bool enc)
> struct cpa_data cpa;
> int ret;
>
> /* Should not be working on unaligned addresses */
> if (WARN_ONCE(addr & ~PAGE_MASK, "misaligned address: %#lx\n", addr))
> addr &= PAGE_MASK;
>
> + if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT) &&
> + (WARN_ONCE(addr & ~HPAGE_MASK, "misaligned address:
> %#lx\n", addr)
> + || WARN_ONCE((numpages << PAGE_SHIFT) & ~HPAGE_MASK,
> + "misaligned numpages: %#lx\n", numpages)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> memset(&cpa, 0, sizeof(cpa));
> cpa.vaddr = &addr;
> cpa.numpages = numpages;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-12 5:52 [RFC V1 0/5] x86: CVMs: Align memory conversions to 2M granularity Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 1/5] swiotlb: Support allocating DMA memory from SWIOTLB Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-14 14:49 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-15 3:33 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-15 9:44 ` Alexander Graf
2024-02-15 20:26 ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-24 17:07 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-24 22:02 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-05 17:19 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 2/5] swiotlb: Allow setting up default alignment of SWIOTLB region Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 3/5] x86: CVMs: Enable dynamic swiotlb by default for CVMs Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-01 12:20 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2024-02-02 4:40 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 4/5] x86: CVMs: Allow allocating all DMA memory from SWIOTLB Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:17 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 3:41 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 5/5] x86: CVMs: Ensure that memory conversions happen at 2M alignment Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:33 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 3:46 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-01 12:02 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2024-02-02 5:08 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-02 8:00 ` Jeremi Piotrowski [this message]
2024-02-02 16:22 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-02 16:35 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-03 5:19 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-30 16:42 ` [RFC V1 0/5] x86: CVMs: Align memory conversions to 2M granularity Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 5:44 ` Vishal Annapurve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3313c886-e964-48c3-8277-b47cb1955de9@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=jxgao@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).