From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
seanjc@google.com, peterz@infradead.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
ardb@kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com, Michael.Roth@amd.com,
KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com, Tycho.Andersen@amd.com,
Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com,
darwi@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 16:25:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5147d9bd-42f8-4ceb-aca4-6ac5fd5cb7f0@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80f3f279-d70e-44d7-a179-c52068115e46@fortanix.com>
On 7/1/2026 4:40 AM, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> Hi Ashish,
>
> I don't believe my concern has been addressed
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0df3b665-3a9c-4c46-a7aa-14388e8e1577@fortanix.com/
>
> --
The disable tracks SNP_INIT, not "SNP" in general: SNP_INIT requires SnpEn to be set on all present CPUs, and a CPU brought online afterward wouldn't have it, so the kernel that runs SNP_INIT must keep its CPU set stable. Today the only kernel that runs SNP_INIT is the bare-metal host, so a plain L1 guest keeps full CPU hotplug.
Concretely, the path is gated by CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP, which bsp_determine_snp() sets only when X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR is clear and clears otherwise
(as Prateek pointed out). So a Linux L1 guest never has it set, never reaches snp_prepare()/snp_rmptable_init(), and keeps CPU hotplug —
including while running SEV/SEV-ES confidential L2 guests. Only SNP initialization disables hotplug; the other SEV variants don't. And KVM doesn't expose
SNP to L1, so an L1 can't be an SNP host today in any case.
On the nested scenario you raised: if SNP-guest-as-L2 support is added, an L1 acting as an SNP host would run a *virtualized* SNP_INIT. A faithful virtualization carries the same constraint as physical SNP_INIT — all present (v)CPUs must be SnpEn — so that L1 would have the same (v)CPU-hotplug-disable requirement, just over its virtual CPUs, and this same code would apply at that level. So the disable isn't too broad; it correctly tracks SNP_INIT. It simply doesn't apply to a plain L1 guest today, because such a guest isn't running SNP_INIT.
Thanks,
Ashish
> Jethro Beekman | CTO | Fortanix
>
> On 2026-06-30 20:11, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>>
>> While SNP is active, every memory write is checked against the RMP to
>> protect SEV-SNP guest memory. A core performs these RMP checks only once
>> SNP has been initialized via SNP_INIT and the SNP-enable bit in SYSCFG is
>> set on that core; the firmware requires the SNP-enable bit to be set on
>> every present CPU before SNP initialization. A core that is not
>> SNP-enabled and not SNP-initialized performs no RMP checks at all, so
>> there is no valid configuration with SNP active and any CPU exempt from
>> RMP checks.
>>
>> The firmware determines which CPUs are present from the processor and the
>> BIOS/UEFI configuration (e.g. SMT disabled in the BIOS) and enumerates
>> them at SNP init; it is not aware of the OS bringing CPUs online or
>> offline afterwards. SNP_INIT fails unless SnpEn is set on all CPUs, so a
>> CPU that is offline at SNP init does not have SnpEn set, SNP_INIT fails,
>> and there can be no SNP guest memory. OS CPU hotplug can thus diverge
>> from the firmware's expectations and break SNP.
>>
>> Tie CPU hotplug to the SNP-enable bit: disable it in snp_prepare() before
>> SNP is enabled, and re-enable it in snp_shutdown() once the firmware has
>> disabled SNP. If snp_prepare() fails before enabling SNP it re-enables
>> hotplug itself; once SNP is enabled hotplug stays disabled, including
>> across a failed SNP_INIT and across the legacy SNP_SHUTDOWN_EX path, both
>> of which leave SNP enabled. A kexec target that boots with SNP already
>> enabled disables hotplug once in snp_rmptable_init(), since snp_prepare()
>> bails when SNP is already enabled.
>>
>> This also keeps the CPU set stable for the asynchronous RMPOPT scan added
>> later in this series, and ensures cpus_read_lock() in the scan is
>> uncontended.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> index dab6e1c290bc..04a58ac4339c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> @@ -535,6 +535,15 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
>>
>> clear_rmp();
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Disable CPU hotplug before enabling SNP, so no CPU can come online
>> + * without SnpEn while SNP is enabled; it is re-enabled in snp_shutdown()
>> + * once SNP is disabled. Must be before cpus_read_lock():
>> + * cpu_hotplug_disable() takes cpu_add_remove_lock, which nests above
>> + * cpu_hotplug_lock.
>> + */
>> + cpu_hotplug_disable();
>> +
>> cpus_read_lock();
>>
>> if (!cpumask_equal(cpu_online_mask, cpu_present_mask)) {
>> @@ -560,6 +569,10 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
>> unlock:
>> cpus_read_unlock();
>>
>> + /* Re-enable CPU hotplug; SnpEn was never set. */
>> + if (ret)
>> + cpu_hotplug_enable();
>> +
>> return ret;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_prepare, "ccp");
>> @@ -587,6 +600,13 @@ void snp_shutdown(void)
>>
>> rmpopt_cleanup();
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Re-enable CPU hotplug now that the firmware has disabled SNP; CPU
>> + * hotplug is not re-enabled for a legacy SNP shutdown. After
>> + * rmpopt_cleanup() so RMPOPT_BASE is cleared with hotplug still disabled.
>> + */
>> + cpu_hotplug_enable();
>> +
>> clear_rmp();
>> on_each_cpu(mfd_reconfigure, NULL, 1);
>> }
>> @@ -645,6 +665,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_setup_rmpopt, "ccp");
>> */
>> int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
>> {
>> + u64 val;
>> +
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP)))
>> return -ENOSYS;
>>
>> @@ -654,6 +676,15 @@ int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
>> if (!setup_rmptable())
>> return -ENOSYS;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * On a kexec boot SNP may already be enabled (legacy firmware leaves
>> + * SnpEn set across shutdown), in which case snp_prepare() bails without
>> + * disabling CPU hotplug, so disable it here.
>> + */
>> + rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);
>> + if (val & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
>> + cpu_hotplug_disable();
>> +
>> /*
>> * Setting crash_kexec_post_notifiers to 'true' to ensure that SNP panic
>> * notifier is invoked to do SNP IOMMU shutdown before kdump.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 18:08 [PATCH v10 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:09 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-07-01 9:40 ` Jethro Beekman
2026-07-01 16:39 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-01 21:08 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-01 21:25 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:12 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5147d9bd-42f8-4ceb-aca4-6ac5fd5cb7f0@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox