Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] virt: tdx-guest: Add Quote generation support using TSM_REPORTS

[Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>]

Peter Gonda wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:17 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > In TDX guest, the attestation process is used to verify the TDX guest
> > trustworthiness to other entities before provisioning secrets to the
> > guest. The first step in the attestation process is TDREPORT
> > generation, which involves getting the guest measurement data in the
> > format of TDREPORT, which is further used to validate the authenticity
> > of the TDX guest. TDREPORT by design is integrity-protected and can
> > only be verified on the local machine.
> >
> > To support remote verification of the TDREPORT in a SGX-based
> > attestation, the TDREPORT needs to be sent to the SGX Quoting Enclave
> > (QE) to convert it to a remotely verifiable Quote. SGX QE by design can
> > only run outside of the TDX guest (i.e. in a host process or in a
> > normal VM) and guest can use communication channels like vsock or
> > TCP/IP to send the TDREPORT to the QE. But for security concerns, the
> > TDX guest may not support these communication channels. To handle such
> > cases, TDX defines a GetQuote hypercall which can be used by the guest
> > to request the host VMM to communicate with the SGX QE. More details
> > about GetQuote hypercall can be found in TDX Guest-Host Communication
> > Interface (GHCI) for Intel TDX 1.0, section titled
> > "TDG.VP.VMCALL<GetQuote>".
> >
> > Trusted Security Module (TSM) [1] exposes a common ABI for Confidential
> > Computing Guest platforms to get the measurement data via ConfigFS.
> > Extend the TSM framework and add support to allow an attestation agent
> > to get the TDX Quote data (included usage example below).
> >
> >   report=/sys/kernel/config/tsm/report/report0
> >   mkdir $report
> >   dd if=/dev/urandom bs=64 count=1 > $report/inblob
> >   hexdump -C $report/outblob
> >   rmdir $report
> >
> > GetQuote TDVMCALL requires TD guest pass a 4K aligned shared buffer
> > with TDREPORT data as input, which is further used by the VMM to copy
> > the TD Quote result after successful Quote generation. To create the
> > shared buffer, allocate a large enough memory and mark it shared using
> > set_memory_decrypted() in tdx_guest_init(). This buffer will be re-used
> > for GetQuote requests in the TDX TSM handler.
> >
> > Although this method reserves a fixed chunk of memory for GetQuote
> > requests, such one time allocation can help avoid memory fragmentation
> > related allocation failures later in the uptime of the guest.
> >
> > Since the Quote generation process is not time-critical or frequently
> > used, the current version uses a polling model for Quote requests and
> > it also does not support parallel GetQuote requests.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/169342399185.3934343.3035845348326944519.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com/ [1]
> > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> 
> Hey Dan,
> 
> I tried running your test commands on an SNP enabled guest. To build
> the kernel I just checked out linus/master and applied your series. I
> haven't done any debugging yet, so I will update with what I find.

Ok, not surprised just because I made major changes to the sev-guest interface
and did not have a way to test.

> root@Ubuntu2004:~#   hexdump -C $report/outblob
> [  219.871875] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  219.876642] kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:187!
> [  219.882280] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [  219.887628] CPU: 0 PID: 1317 Comm: hexdump Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-xfstests-000
> 44-gf636850ddfc7 #1
> [  219.896530] Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine

Might you be able to send me info offlist about how I can spin this up so I can
test without waiting for the community to try it out?

In any event, thanks for testing! Appreciate it.