From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>, <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <dionnaglaze@google.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] virt: tdx-guest: Deprecate legacy IOCTL-based interface for quote generation
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:23:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65baac2b79c90_37ad294e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240124093858.1818497-1-nik.borisov@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> IOCTL based interface was the natural choice for interacting with the
> quote generation machine at a time when there wasn't anything better.
That's not quite how I would phrase it. Perhaps just quote configfs-tsm
changelog? Something like:
---
"The commit that added configfs-tsm noted that the concept of
attestation reports is '...common across TSMs, but the implementations
are unfortunately vendor specific. While the industry grapples with a
common definition of this attestation format [1], Linux need not make
this problem worse by defining a new ABI per TSM that wants to perform a
similar operation. The current momentum has been to invent new ioctl-ABI
per TSM per function which at best is an abdication of the kernel's
responsibility to make common infrastructure concepts share common
ABI.'
While the SEV-SNP implementation exposed remotely verifiable reports
from day1 the TDX implementation started with a locally verifiable
report retrieved over ioctl, but adopted configs-tsm for conveying its
remotely verifiable report"
---
Then there needs to be a discussion here to describe who is still using
the local attestation reports, what their migration path is (if one is
needed), and some indication how does a distribution vendor know when
those users have migrated or dropped their interest.
> Fortunately, now we have a vendor-agnostic, configfs-based one which
> obviates the need to have the IOCTL-based interface.
>
> Gate the relevant code behind a Kconfig option, clearly marking it as
> deprecated as well as introduce a runtime warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig b/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig
> index 22dd59e19431..0f1cfdfbbd28 100644
> --- a/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/Kconfig
> @@ -9,3 +9,12 @@ config TDX_GUEST_DRIVER
>
> To compile this driver as module, choose M here. The module will
> be called tdx-guest.
> +
> +config TDX_GUEST_DRIVER_LEGACY_IOCTL
> + def_bool y
> + prompt "Enable legacy ioctl interface (DEPRECATED)"
> + depends on TDX_GUEST_DRIVER
> + help
> + Enable the legacy IOCTL-based interface to get the TDX report. It's
> + deprecated in favor of the configfs based one and will be removed
> + in a future release.
This too should document how a user would know if they need this or not.
> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c
> index 1253bf76b570..b8cea9486daf 100644
> --- a/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c
> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(quote_lock);
> */
> static u32 getquote_timeout = 30;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TDX_GUEST_DRIVER_LEGACY_IOCTL
> static long tdx_get_report0(struct tdx_report_req __user *req)
> {
> u8 *reportdata, *tdreport;
> @@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ static long tdx_get_report0(struct tdx_report_req __user *req)
>
> return ret;
> }
> +#endif
Please no sprinkling of ifdef throughout the file. Create a new file
like drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/miscdev.c, and optionally compile it.
With a tdx_misc_register() that stubs out the setup, something like:
#ifdef CONFIG_TDX_GUEST_REPORT_IOCTL
int tdx_misc_register(void);
#else
static inline int tdx_misc_register(void) { return 0; }
#endif
>
> static void free_quote_buf(void *buf)
> {
> @@ -249,6 +251,9 @@ static int tdx_report_new(struct tsm_report *report, void *data)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TDX_GUEST_DRIVER_LEGACY_IOCTL
> static long tdx_guest_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> @@ -271,6 +276,7 @@ static struct miscdevice tdx_misc_dev = {
> .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
> .fops = &tdx_guest_fops,
> };
> +#endif
>
> static const struct x86_cpu_id tdx_guest_ids[] = {
> X86_MATCH_FEATURE(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST, NULL),
> @@ -290,9 +296,12 @@ static int __init tdx_guest_init(void)
> if (!x86_match_cpu(tdx_guest_ids))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TDX_GUEST_DRIVER_LEGACY_IOCTL
> + pr_info("Legacy IOCTL-based interface is deprecated and will be removed in a future release\n");
No, don't spam the log on driver load, maybe add a pr_info_once() in the
ioctl path itself. Then you get some rough telemmetry of actual usage if
people post kernel logs to the kernel mailing list(s).
> ret = misc_register(&tdx_misc_dev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> +#endif
>
> quote_data = alloc_quote_buf();
> if (!quote_data) {
> @@ -310,7 +319,9 @@ static int __init tdx_guest_init(void)
> free_quote:
> free_quote_buf(quote_data);
> free_misc:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TDX_GUEST_DRIVER_LEGACY_IOCTL
> misc_deregister(&tdx_misc_dev);
> +#endif
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -320,7 +331,9 @@ static void __exit tdx_guest_exit(void)
> {
> tsm_unregister(&tdx_tsm_ops);
> free_quote_buf(quote_data);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TDX_GUEST_DRIVER_LEGACY_IOCTL
> misc_deregister(&tdx_misc_dev);
> +#endif
> }
> module_exit(tdx_guest_exit);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 9:38 [PATCH] virt: tdx-guest: Deprecate legacy IOCTL-based interface for quote generation Nikolay Borisov
2024-01-31 7:28 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-01-31 15:27 ` Dave Hansen
2024-01-31 18:18 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-01-31 19:05 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 4:14 ` Haitao Huang
2024-02-01 4:55 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-31 7:48 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-01-31 19:50 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-31 19:56 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-01-31 20:44 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-01-31 21:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-01-31 21:12 ` Dan Williams
2024-02-01 2:52 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-01 8:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-01-31 21:09 ` Dan Williams
2024-02-08 13:42 ` Mikko Ylinen
2024-02-09 2:23 ` Dan Middleton
2024-02-12 23:12 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-31 20:23 ` Dan Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65baac2b79c90_37ad294e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dionnaglaze@google.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).