From: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: Extract VMXON and EFER.SVME enablement to kernel
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 16:41:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6939242dcfff1_20cb5100c3@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTiAKG4TlKcZnJnn@google.com>
Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2025, dan.j.williams@intel.com wrote:
> > Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > @@ -694,9 +696,6 @@ static void drop_user_return_notifiers(void)
> > > kvm_on_user_return(&msrs->urn);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -__visible bool kvm_rebooting;
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM_INTERNAL(kvm_rebooting);
> >
> > ...a short stay for this symbol in kvm/x86.c? It raises my curiosity why
> > patch1 is separate.
>
> Because it affects non-x86 architectures. It should be a complete nop, but I
> wanted to isolate what I could.
Ok.
[..]
> > > +static cpu_emergency_virt_cb __rcu *kvm_emergency_callback;
> >
> > Hmm, why kvm_ and not virt_?
>
> I was trying to capture that this callback can _only_ be used by KVM, because
> KVM is the only in-tree hypervisor. That's also why the exports are only for
> KVM (and will use EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM() when I post the next version).
Oh, true, that makes sense.
> > [..]
> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL)
> > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vmcs *, root_vmcs);
> >
> > Perhaps introduce a CONFIG_INTEL_VMX for this? For example, KVM need not
> > be enabled if all one wants to do is use TDX to setup PCIe Link
> > Encryption. ...or were you expecting?
> >
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL) || IS_ENABLED(...<other VMX users>...)
>
> I don't think we need anything at this time. INTEL_TDX_HOST depends on KVM_INTEL,
> and so without a user that needs VMXON without KVM_INTEL, I think we're good as-is.
>
> config INTEL_TDX_HOST
> bool "Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) host support"
> depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
> depends on X86_64
> depends on KVM_INTEL
...but INTEL_TDX_HOST, it turns out, does not have any functional
dependencies on KVM_INTEL. At least, not since I last checked. Yes, it
would be silly and result in dead code today to do a build with:
CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST=y
CONFIG_KVM_INTEL=n
However, when the TDX Connect support arrives you could have:
CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST=y
CONFIG_KVM_INTEL=n
CONFIG_TDX_HOST_SERVICES=y
Where "TDX Host Services" is a driver for PCIe Link Encryption and TDX
Module update. Whether such configuration freedom has any practical
value is a separate question.
I am ok if the answer is, "wait until someone shows up who really wants
PCIe Link Encryption without KVM".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-06 1:10 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86/tdx: Have TDX handle VMXON during bringup Sean Christopherson
2025-12-06 1:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86: Move kvm_rebooting to x86 Sean Christopherson
2025-12-09 7:46 ` Chao Gao
2026-01-05 17:48 ` Dave Hansen
2025-12-06 1:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: Extract VMXON and EFER.SVME enablement to kernel Sean Christopherson
2025-12-07 7:22 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-09 20:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-10 7:41 ` dan.j.williams [this message]
2025-12-10 14:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-24 11:07 ` Xu Yilun
2025-12-30 22:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-09 5:48 ` Chao Gao
2025-12-17 6:57 ` Xu Yilun
2025-12-17 19:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-19 2:14 ` Xu Yilun
2025-12-19 15:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-19 17:30 ` Dave Hansen
2025-12-19 21:12 ` Huang, Kai
2026-01-27 2:46 ` Binbin Wu
2025-12-19 17:45 ` Dave Hansen
2025-12-19 18:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-19 18:48 ` Dave Hansen
2025-12-06 1:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: x86/tdx: Do VMXON and TDX-Module initialization during subsys init Sean Christopherson
2025-12-07 7:25 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-08 23:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-09 1:34 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-09 7:06 ` Chao Gao
2025-12-12 18:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-06 1:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] x86/virt/tdx: Tag a pile of functions as __init, and globals as __ro_after_init Sean Christopherson
2025-12-09 4:17 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-09 7:26 ` Chao Gao
2025-12-06 1:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] x86/virt/tdx: KVM: Consolidate TDX CPU hotplug handling Sean Christopherson
2025-12-09 4:19 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-06 1:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86/virt/tdx: Use ida_is_empty() to detect if any TDs may be running Sean Christopherson
2025-12-09 4:19 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-09 7:33 ` Chao Gao
2025-12-06 1:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: Bury kvm_{en,dis}able_virtualization() in kvm_main.c once more Sean Christopherson
2025-12-09 4:20 ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-09 7:37 ` Chao Gao
2025-12-08 2:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86/tdx: Have TDX handle VMXON during bringup Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6939242dcfff1_20cb5100c3@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox