From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
maz@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, steven.price@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
eric.auger@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 08/33] arm: realm: Make uart available before MMU is enabled
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:09:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81957f31-27e1-492c-b294-c89a2f590d99@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiZZ17+/Br80pLLm@arm.com>
Hi Alex
On 22/04/2024 13:36, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:23:05PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:09:13PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> Hi Alexandru
>>>
>>> On 22/04/2024 12:58, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:33:43AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>>>> From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> A Realm must access any emulated I/O mappings with the PTE_NS_SHARED bit set.
>>>>> This is modelled as a PTE attribute, but is actually part of the address.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, when MMU is disabled, the "physical address" must reflect this bit set. We
>>>>> access the UART early before the MMU is enabled. So, make sure the UART is
>>>>> accessed always with the bit set.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> lib/arm/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++++
>>>>> lib/arm/io.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> lib/arm64/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++++
>>>>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/pgtable.h b/lib/arm/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> index 350039ff..7e85e7c6 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/arm/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/arm/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> @@ -112,4 +112,9 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_alloc(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr)
>>>>> return pte_offset(pmd, addr);
>>>>> }
>>>>> +static inline unsigned long arm_shared_phys_alias(void *x)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return ((unsigned long)(x) | PTE_NS_SHARED);
>>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>> Is it allowed for a realm to run in aarch32 mode?
>>>
>>> No. Realm EL1 must be Aarch64.
>>
>> Ok, then can you make the above function return the original address?
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> #endif /* _ASMARM_PGTABLE_H_ */
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/arm/io.c b/lib/arm/io.c
>>>>> index 836fa854..127727e4 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/arm/io.c
>>>>> +++ b/lib/arm/io.c
>>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>>>>> #include <asm/psci.h>
>>>>> #include <asm/spinlock.h>
>>>>> #include <asm/io.h>
>>>>> +#include <asm/mmu-api.h>
>>>>> +#include <asm/pgtable.h>
>>>>> #include "io.h"
>>>>> @@ -30,6 +32,24 @@ static struct spinlock uart_lock;
>>>>> static volatile u8 *uart0_base = UART_EARLY_BASE;
>>>>> bool is_pl011_uart;
>>>>> +static inline volatile u8 *get_uart_base(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * The address of the UART base may be different
>>>>> + * based on whether we are running with/without
>>>>> + * MMU enabled.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * For realms, we must force to use the shared physical
>>>>> + * alias with MMU disabled, to make sure the I/O can
>>>>> + * be emulated.
>>>>> + * When the MMU is turned ON, the mappings are created
>>>>> + * appropriately.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (mmu_enabled())
>>>>> + return uart0_base;
>>>>> + return (u8 *)arm_shared_phys_alias((void *)uart0_base);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static void uart0_init_fdt(void)
>>>>> {
>>>>> /*
>>>>> @@ -109,9 +129,11 @@ void io_init(void)
>>>>> void puts(const char *s)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + volatile u8 *uart_base = get_uart_base();
>>
>> Is it just my email client or is the indentation missing here?
I can confirm that the original patch/email is correctly indented
with TAB.
>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> spin_lock(&uart_lock);
>>>>> while (*s)
>>>>> - writeb(*s++, uart0_base);
>>>>> + writeb(*s++, uart_base);
>>>>> spin_unlock(&uart_lock);
>>>>> }
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/arm64/asm/pgtable.h b/lib/arm64/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> index 5b9f40b0..871c03e9 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/arm64/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/arm64/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ extern unsigned long prot_ns_shared;
>>>>> */
>>>>> #define PTE_NS_SHARED (prot_ns_shared)
>>>>> +static inline unsigned long arm_shared_phys_alias(void *addr)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return ((unsigned long)addr | PTE_NS_SHARED);
>>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>> Have you considered specifying the correct UART address at compile time using
>>>> ./configure --earlycon?
>>>
>>> Do you mean
>>>
>>> ./configure --earlycon=<NS-Alias-normal-UART-Address> for Realms ?
>>>
>>> If so, there are multiple issues with that :
>>>
>>> 1. A payload could be run in a normal VM or a Realm VM. Having the above
>>> restricts using the same payload in different worlds. (e.g., comparison).
>>>
>>> 2. The IPA width of the Realm and thus the PTE_NS_SHARED is dynamic
>>> and really depends on what the VMM decides to choose the IPA size.
>>> (Could be based on user input).
>>
>> Does it depend on the chosen IPA size, or on the VA size, or on both?
>> Because uart0_base is used with both the MMU on and off.
>
> Oh, ok, my bad, I hadn't realized that the uart address is modified only if the
> MMU is not enabled. So it's actually only the IPA that must have the bit set.
>
> I have to say that a PTE attribute, as it is called in the commit message, which
> has a variable bit position that depends on the output address size is quite
> surprising. I was under the impression that the bit position is constant when I
> made the suggestion.
I understand, may be we could make that clear in the commit description.
>
> Yeah, it makes sense to have a helper to set the bit based on whether or not the
> MMU is enabled.
Thanks
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 10:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/33] Support for Arm Confidential Compute Architecture Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-10 16:17 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-15 8:59 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 01/33] arm: Add necessary header files in asm/pgtable.h Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 02/33] arm: Detect FDT overlap with uninitialised data Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 03/33] arm64: Expand SMCCC arguments and return values Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 04/33] arm: Make physical address mask dynamic Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 05/33] arm64: Introduce NS_SHARED PTE attribute Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 06/33] arm: Move io_init after vm initialization Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 07/33] arm: realm: Add RSI interface header Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 08/33] arm: realm: Make uart available before MMU is enabled Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-22 11:58 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-04-22 12:09 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-22 12:23 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-04-22 12:36 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-04-22 13:09 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2024-04-22 15:38 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-04-22 16:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-22 16:15 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-04-26 11:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-26 13:51 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 09/33] arm: realm: Realm initialisation Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 10/33] arm: realm: Add support for changing the state of memory Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 11/33] arm: realm: Set RIPAS state for RAM Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 12/33] arm: realm: Early memory setup Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 13/33] arm: realm: Add RSI version test Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 14/33] arm: selftest: realm: skip pabt test when running in a realm Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-22 15:48 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 15/33] arm: realm: add hvc and RSI_HOST_CALL tests Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 16/33] arm64: add ESR_ELx EC.SVE Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 17/33] arm64: enable SVE at startup Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 18/33] arm: realm: Add test for FPU/SIMD context save/restore Suzuki K Poulose
2024-05-10 15:28 ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-14 10:27 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 19/33] arm64: selftest: add realm SVE VL test Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 20/33] arm: realm: Add tests for in realm SEA Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 21/33] lib/alloc_page: Add shared page allocation support Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 22/33] arm: gic-v3-its: Use shared pages wherever needed Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 23/33] arm: realm: Enable memory encryption Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 24/33] qcbor: Add QCBOR as a submodule Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 25/33] arm: Add build steps for QCBOR library Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 26/33] arm: Add a library to verify tokens using the " Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 27/33] arm: realm: add RSI interface for attestation measurements Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 28/33] arm: realm: Add helpers to decode RSI return codes Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 29/33] arm: realm: Add Realm attestation tests Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 30/33] " Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 31/33] arm: realm: Add a test for shared memory Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 32/33] arm: Add memtest support Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12 10:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 33/33] NOT-FOR-MERGING: add run-realm-tests Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-16 14:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/33] Support for Arm Confidential Compute Architecture Jean-Philippe Brucker
2024-05-10 15:23 ` Andrew Jones
2024-06-03 12:50 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81957f31-27e1-492c-b294-c89a2f590d99@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).