Linux Confidential Computing Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<seanjc@google.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	<aik@amd.com>, <Michael.Roth@amd.com>, <Tycho.Andersen@amd.com>,
	<Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>, <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	<jackyli@google.com>, <pgonda@google.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
	<jacobhxu@google.com>, <xin@zytor.com>,
	<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	<dyoung@redhat.com>, <nikunj@amd.com>, <john.allen@amd.com>,
	<darwi@linutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 03:46:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <898e378a-cf7c-4310-b439-e28ec0a71338@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c64d96f-f932-4db9-8119-b9e40d5b7fd9@amd.com>

Hello Ashish,

On 6/26/2026 1:12 AM, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> Hello Boris,
> 
> On 6/25/2026 10:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 09:56:49PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>>> +/* Set while SNP has CPU hotplug disabled (kernel-lifetime; survives ccp reload). */
>>> +static bool snp_cpu_hotplug_disabled;
>>
>> Do you really need this?
>>
> 
> Yes.
> 
> cpu_hotplug_disable()/cpu_hotplug_enable() are refcounted (cpu_hotplug_disabled++/--,
> with a WARN on underflow), so they have to be balanced. This flag collapses them to
> exactly one outstanding disable per SNP-active window, because the disable and enable
> sites are not reached a symmetric number of times:
> >   - On firmware without SNP_X86_SHUTDOWN_SUPPORTED, __sev_snp_shutdown_locked() does not
>   call snp_shutdown() (it's gated on data.x86_snp_shutdown), so SNP stays enabled in
>   hardware — SNP_EN stays set and hotplug stays disabled — while sev->snp_initialized is
>   cleared. Re-init after that is routine, the SNP ioctls self-bracket init and shutdown
>   (e.g. SNP_COMMIT, SNP_SET_CONFIG, SNP_VLEK_LOAD):
> 
>   if (!sev->snp_initialized)
>           snp_move_to_init_state(...);   /* -> __sev_snp_init_locked -> snp_prepare() */
>   ... SNP_CMD ...
>   if (shutdown_required)
>           __sev_snp_shutdown_locked(...);
>   - So whenever SNP isn't already initialized (psp_init_on_probe off, or after a prior
>   legacy shutdown), every such ioctl does init -> command -> legacy shutdown. Each init
>   reaches snp_prepare() with SNP_EN already set, and the disable now sits at the top of
>   snp_prepare(), so it fires on every cycle. Without this flag that keeps bumping
>   cpu_hotplug_disabled while the legacy shutdown never re-enables — hotplug ends up stuck
>   disabled. This flag makes all but the first disable a no-op.
>  
>   - Also, importantly, kvm-amd module reload on legacy firmware is the same pattern: 
>   unload leaves SNP_EN set, reload re-inits.)

Looking at snp_prepare(), we have an early-bailout for

    rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);
    if (val & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
         return;

Does executing SHUTDOWN command lead to the firmware clearing SNP_EN in
SYSCFG on all CPUS?

If SNP_EN remains set (and Linux can't clear it since it is
"Write-1-only" bit), then a subsequent snp_prepare() will skip setting
SYSCFG if it sees SNP_EN on local CPU.

It can so happen that we enable hotlpug at shutdown, CPUs come online
without setting SNP_EN in SYSCFG, subsequent snp_prepare() runs on a CPU
where SNP_EN is still set and skips configuring it for the CPUs that
don't have it set, and we'll be in a pickle still.

The comment above that bailout saying "this can happen in case of kexec
boot" makes me believe that SNP_EN remains set until a full system
reset.

The only safe way to do this is to ensure all possible CPUs are online
during snp_prepare() and do snp_enable() regardless of whether local CPU
has SNP_EN or not.

Am I missing something?

> 
>   - On the enable side it avoids an unbalanced cpu_hotplug_enable() when the teardown/failure
>   paths run without an outstanding disable (e.g. shutdown of a never-fully-initialized SNP).
> 
> So it's not redundant with cpu_hotplug_disabled — it tracks whether the outstanding disable
> belongs to this SNP-active window in this kernel, which keeps the single disable/enable
> balanced across the asymmetric legacy-vs-full SNP teardown paths and re-init.
-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-25 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1782336473.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-06-25  3:45   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25  5:38     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-25 15:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-25 19:42     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-25 22:16       ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-06-26  2:38         ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-26  4:01           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-26 20:23             ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-26 16:40       ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-26 20:59         ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:59 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=898e378a-cf7c-4310-b439-e28ec0a71338@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
    --cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
    --cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jackyli@google.com \
    --cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
    --cc=john.allen@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox