From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<seanjc@google.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<aik@amd.com>, <Michael.Roth@amd.com>, <Tycho.Andersen@amd.com>,
<Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>, <ackerleytng@google.com>,
<jackyli@google.com>, <pgonda@google.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
<jacobhxu@google.com>, <xin@zytor.com>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<dyoung@redhat.com>, <nikunj@amd.com>, <john.allen@amd.com>,
<darwi@linutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 03:46:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <898e378a-cf7c-4310-b439-e28ec0a71338@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c64d96f-f932-4db9-8119-b9e40d5b7fd9@amd.com>
Hello Ashish,
On 6/26/2026 1:12 AM, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> Hello Boris,
>
> On 6/25/2026 10:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 09:56:49PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>>> +/* Set while SNP has CPU hotplug disabled (kernel-lifetime; survives ccp reload). */
>>> +static bool snp_cpu_hotplug_disabled;
>>
>> Do you really need this?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
> cpu_hotplug_disable()/cpu_hotplug_enable() are refcounted (cpu_hotplug_disabled++/--,
> with a WARN on underflow), so they have to be balanced. This flag collapses them to
> exactly one outstanding disable per SNP-active window, because the disable and enable
> sites are not reached a symmetric number of times:
> > - On firmware without SNP_X86_SHUTDOWN_SUPPORTED, __sev_snp_shutdown_locked() does not
> call snp_shutdown() (it's gated on data.x86_snp_shutdown), so SNP stays enabled in
> hardware — SNP_EN stays set and hotplug stays disabled — while sev->snp_initialized is
> cleared. Re-init after that is routine, the SNP ioctls self-bracket init and shutdown
> (e.g. SNP_COMMIT, SNP_SET_CONFIG, SNP_VLEK_LOAD):
>
> if (!sev->snp_initialized)
> snp_move_to_init_state(...); /* -> __sev_snp_init_locked -> snp_prepare() */
> ... SNP_CMD ...
> if (shutdown_required)
> __sev_snp_shutdown_locked(...);
> - So whenever SNP isn't already initialized (psp_init_on_probe off, or after a prior
> legacy shutdown), every such ioctl does init -> command -> legacy shutdown. Each init
> reaches snp_prepare() with SNP_EN already set, and the disable now sits at the top of
> snp_prepare(), so it fires on every cycle. Without this flag that keeps bumping
> cpu_hotplug_disabled while the legacy shutdown never re-enables — hotplug ends up stuck
> disabled. This flag makes all but the first disable a no-op.
>
> - Also, importantly, kvm-amd module reload on legacy firmware is the same pattern:
> unload leaves SNP_EN set, reload re-inits.)
Looking at snp_prepare(), we have an early-bailout for
rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);
if (val & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
return;
Does executing SHUTDOWN command lead to the firmware clearing SNP_EN in
SYSCFG on all CPUS?
If SNP_EN remains set (and Linux can't clear it since it is
"Write-1-only" bit), then a subsequent snp_prepare() will skip setting
SYSCFG if it sees SNP_EN on local CPU.
It can so happen that we enable hotlpug at shutdown, CPUs come online
without setting SNP_EN in SYSCFG, subsequent snp_prepare() runs on a CPU
where SNP_EN is still set and skips configuring it for the CPUs that
don't have it set, and we'll be in a pickle still.
The comment above that bailout saying "this can happen in case of kexec
boot" makes me believe that SNP_EN remains set until a full system
reset.
The only safe way to do this is to ensure all possible CPUs are online
during snp_prepare() and do snp_enable() regardless of whether local CPU
has SNP_EN or not.
Am I missing something?
>
> - On the enable side it avoids an unbalanced cpu_hotplug_enable() when the teardown/failure
> paths run without an outstanding disable (e.g. shutdown of a never-fully-initialized SNP).
>
> So it's not redundant with cpu_hotplug_disabled — it tracks whether the outstanding disable
> belongs to this SNP-active window in this kernel, which keeps the single disable/enable
> balanced across the asymmetric legacy-vs-full SNP teardown paths and re-init.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1782336473.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-06-25 3:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25 5:38 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-25 15:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-25 19:42 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-25 22:16 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-06-26 2:38 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-26 4:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-26 20:23 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-26 16:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-26 20:59 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-06-24 21:59 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=898e378a-cf7c-4310-b439-e28ec0a71338@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox