linux-coco.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] arm64: Detect if in a realm and set RIPAS RAM
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:31:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a8ad27f-dc8f-4d44-bb35-67fd1133afbb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241004144307.66199-3-steven.price@arm.com>

On 10/5/24 12:42 AM, Steven Price wrote:
> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> 
> Detect that the VM is a realm guest by the presence of the RSI
> interface. This is done after PSCI has been initialised so that we can
> check the SMCCC conduit before making any RSI calls.
> 
> If in a realm then all memory needs to be marked as RIPAS RAM initially,
> the loader may or may not have done this for us. To be sure iterate over
> all RAM and mark it as such. Any failure is fatal as that implies the
> RAM regions passed to Linux are incorrect - which would mean failing
> later when attempting to access non-existent RAM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
> Changes since v5:
>   * Replace BUG_ON() with a panic() call that provides a message with the
>     memory range that couldn't be set to RIPAS_RAM.
>   * Move the call to arm64_rsi_init() later so that it is after PSCI,
>     this means we can use arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() to check if it is
>     safe to make RSI calls.
> Changes since v4:
>   * Minor tidy ups.
> Changes since v3:
>   * Provide safe/unsafe versions for converting memory to protected,
>     using the safer version only for the early boot.
>   * Use the new psci_early_test_conduit() function to avoid calling an
>     SMC if EL3 is not present (or not configured to handle an SMC).
> Changes since v2:
>   * Use DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE rather than "extern struct
>     static_key_false".
>   * Rename set_memory_range() to rsi_set_memory_range().
>   * Downgrade some BUG()s to WARN()s and handle the condition by
>     propagating up the stack. Comment the remaining case that ends in a
>     BUG() to explain why.
>   * Rely on the return from rsi_request_version() rather than checking
>     the version the RMM claims to support.
>   * Rename the generic sounding arm64_setup_memory() to
>     arm64_rsi_setup_memory() and move the call site to setup_arch().
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile   |  3 +-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/rsi.c      | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c    |  3 ++
>   4 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi.h
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/rsi.c
> 

Two nitpicks below.

Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e4c01796c618
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_RSI_H_
> +#define __ASM_RSI_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <asm/rsi_cmds.h>
> +
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rsi_present);
> +
> +void __init arm64_rsi_init(void);
> +
> +static inline bool is_realm_world(void)
> +{
> +	return static_branch_unlikely(&rsi_present);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rsi_set_memory_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
> +				       enum ripas state, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	unsigned long ret;
> +	phys_addr_t top;
> +
> +	while (start != end) {
> +		ret = rsi_set_addr_range_state(start, end, state, flags, &top);
> +		if (WARN_ON(ret || top < start || top > end))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		start = top;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

The WARN_ON() is redundant when the caller is arm64_rsi_setup_memory(), where
system panic is invoked on any errors. So we perhaps need to drop the WARN_ON().

[...]

> +
> +static void __init arm64_rsi_setup_memory(void)
> +{
> +	u64 i;
> +	phys_addr_t start, end;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Iterate over the available memory ranges and convert the state to
> +	 * protected memory. We should take extra care to ensure that we DO NOT
> +	 * permit any "DESTROYED" pages to be converted to "RAM".
> +	 *
> +	 * panic() is used because if the attempt to switch the memory to
> +	 * protected has failed here, then future accesses to the memory are
> +	 * simply going to be reflected as a SEA (Synchronous External Abort)
> +	 * which we can't handle.  Bailing out early prevents the guest limping
> +	 * on and dying later.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) {
> +		if (rsi_set_memory_range_protected_safe(start, end))
> +			panic("Failed to set memory range to protected: %pa-%pa",
> +			      &start, &end);
> +	}
> +}
> +

{} is needed since the panic statement spans multiple lines.

Thanks,
Gavin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-07 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-04 14:42 [PATCH v6 00/11] arm64: Support for running as a guest in Arm CCA Steven Price
2024-10-04 14:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] arm64: rsi: Add RSI definitions Steven Price
2024-10-07 23:08   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-11 14:14     ` Steven Price
2024-10-04 14:42 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] arm64: Detect if in a realm and set RIPAS RAM Steven Price
2024-10-04 15:05   ` Steven Price
2024-10-11 13:12     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-07 23:31   ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2024-10-11 14:14     ` Steven Price
2024-10-04 14:42 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] arm64: realm: Query IPA size from the RMM Steven Price
2024-10-07 23:33   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-15  3:55   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-15  9:08     ` Steven Price
2024-10-04 14:42 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] arm64: rsi: Add support for checking whether an MMIO is protected Steven Price
2024-10-08  0:24   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-11 14:14     ` Steven Price
2024-10-04 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64: rsi: Map unprotected MMIO as decrypted Steven Price
2024-10-08  0:31   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-11 13:19     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-12  5:22       ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-11 13:20   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-04 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] efi: arm64: Map Device with Prot Shared Steven Price
2024-10-08  0:31   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-11 13:23   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-04 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] arm64: Enforce bounce buffers for realm DMA Steven Price
2024-10-08  2:51   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-04 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] arm64: mm: Avoid TLBI when marking pages as valid Steven Price
2024-10-08  2:52   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-15  9:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-10-04 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] arm64: Enable memory encrypt for Realms Steven Price
2024-10-08  2:56   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-04 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] virt: arm-cca-guest: TSM_REPORT support for realms Steven Price
2024-10-05 15:42   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08  4:12   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-11 14:14     ` Steven Price
2024-10-11 16:22       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-10-12  6:06         ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-14  8:56           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-10-14 14:41             ` Steven Price
2024-10-14 14:46               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-10-15  0:01                 ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-04 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] arm64: Document Arm Confidential Compute Steven Price
2024-10-08  4:17   ` Gavin Shan
2024-10-08 11:05   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2024-10-11 14:14     ` Steven Price
2024-10-15  9:55       ` Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8a8ad27f-dc8f-4d44-bb35-67fd1133afbb@redhat.com \
    --to=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).