From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f201.google.com (mail-pf1-f201.google.com [209.85.210.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93D273B2FDF for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777419217; cv=none; b=mGRrbV5sF3OjbaMK/Fj70LPQ6TAw9xk29JioECB27MeeC1LLeJTFdCSzVGHeVGsrS+2/Xur9TUh90NMhIQmqSfrtGK9XJqfzrR07okScYozstuDNtKyiWigeaPMtgPN+vGgnItQrNyIfxADSXc991JklO2w+XROhb5tUql4r/BI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777419217; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bSl0Ml6IHrW3qDTTj/PbwouszbUAxe7p9oC9LS2cUxY=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=kSKICTF4yXDNHWADiTKb7gBwARgiaSE+Lju7NvFujUbG8JE+DOk9gEFeu0OrDkNitiO87xxU+yIfJTpG5m8KKB0RpP6Y2ZnVko4UX8XhI6iva9Tn3S3UbRbF7x0QnaBpsWYjjejjngKc9QEXkH+90w8ozo4k514+rhRvuiubcgY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ackerleytng.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=Rs9+Ydoo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ackerleytng.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Rs9+Ydoo" Received: by mail-pf1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-82f8bbb4045so6990612b3a.2 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1777419213; x=1778024013; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MEO36girPr+drwE77RQ8xryHhyT8L0VbpSDbMsS1X7s=; b=Rs9+Ydool5bxlaB0s0AWouWhDN2J7JrtFPhWiroz113s4i9up3vQOsR8helEd01gS5 A+f7c/XqMw8BkJYhTP7d7AdAGnYWE9QVEm7kjqYVQvtiNdbEtV3p1ZE5FRr4SSc/XjCl 4zWQOLxbIT9aOtVbupkfG7RL8oWZIBVOzWJ/4DxxEEfMs4y/PyWlXi1lGGEYJI97vkXn VHGdND7e20vZ069j7u6sHKSL0hYlRg/xQ12GIKqLG1NB6vcwLqvigJcN7TfxGqJTpSIj WrT1wTcqKAhS9pmIhzW0rjLpC8JfkDFlOYc1hrv2ZcKsyp1akfUx/v3nj1p4JbXBndEZ tVFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1777419213; x=1778024013; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MEO36girPr+drwE77RQ8xryHhyT8L0VbpSDbMsS1X7s=; b=bfCT7Mep7S/2foX2XkGxRdZUdgWG+MAdvn5YaiFPfE14Z6DVNj9H42fIswr8O8xJeY m7HZIiyH3HkSgiWQdVzyLXt63X89CKyEOD8NsnjRFOsNgA9gv/7MZeUo7He/6IJjANih jyWNfn9JSlxnau5N/KR1W0pOWTpmhmbdfoohOXB8hrS/UgqefqOSjSyt7VSVfsaovb88 RSKlgAAU3zr2CqUbUiU5Lvwddkeh9HYscxckkokStxP8RcN5lnfVXGQr/R2M0NcAm4fe RrOKKvCkrtOnsfbez6F8Ho5IVqg0COiDeiq9bfirrehM9zn4dlJY2M7v4pn3nwFSkHJV gE5Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+kcNwtJZeXVC6kbsNfrnlaPUcEYoYJRGBpO7/Lqriy5UUA5ABLhdMmHpDrLdEqj8ygxB3c8ghZxjT8@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzlyOvEb7bB5HvMHVV0KBY9PCtx2AKLUSjhlOy7bDXRquxPP40o DsfHOF14BvFNFL8Nccm1Udhj/cWC+jc5IamtforFlk9uOMn9oMBnJK26TBP3T0fEWUbjFzOWj+L 4PGd29SJwJgcpnikJxMkuyf3mKQ== X-Received: from pfoo12.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6a00:1a0c:b0:82f:bc93:4ae2]) (user=ackerleytng job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6a00:1993:b0:82f:120:fd6f with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-834dd919817mr4905304b3a.0.1777419212551; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:33:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20260428-gmem-inplace-conversion-v5-0-d8608ccfca22@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0.545.g6539524ca2-goog Message-ID: <8c0dc96e0776bdcffc4d2e1a9d7336f106289a48.1777418884.git.ackerleytng@google.com> Subject: [POC PATCH 3/6] KVM: selftests: Make guest_code_xsave more friendly From: Ackerley Tng To: devnull+ackerleytng.google.com@kernel.org Cc: ackerleytng@google.com, aik@amd.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andrew.jones@linux.dev, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, axelrasmussen@google.com, baohua@kernel.org, bhe@redhat.com, binbin.wu@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, brauner@kernel.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, chrisl@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, david@kernel.org, forkloop@google.com, hpa@zytor.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, jmattson@google.com, jthoughton@google.com, kas@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, michael.roth@amd.com, mingo@redhat.com, nphamcs@gmail.com, oupton@kernel.org, pankaj.gupta@amd.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, pratyush@kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev, qperret@google.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, seanjc@google.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, shivankg@amd.com, shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, steven.price@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, tabba@google.com, tglx@kernel.org, vannapurve@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, weixugc@google.com, willy@infradead.org, wyihan@google.com, x86@kernel.org, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, youngjun.park@lge.com, yuanchu@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" The original implementation of guest_code_xsave makes a jmp to guest_sev_es_code in inline assembly. When code that uses guest_sev_es_code is removed, guest_sev_es_code will be optimized out, leading to a linking error since guest_code_xsave still tries to jmp to guest_sev_es_code. Rewrite guest_code_xsave() to instead make a call, in C, to guest_sev_es_code(), so that usage of guest_sev_es_code() is made known to the compiler. This rewriting also gives a name to the xsave inline assembly, improving readability. Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng --- .../selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c | 24 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c index 1a49ee3915864..8b859adf4cf6f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c @@ -80,13 +80,23 @@ static void guest_sev_code(void) GUEST_DONE(); } -/* Stash state passed via VMSA before any compiled code runs. */ -extern void guest_code_xsave(void); -asm("guest_code_xsave:\n" - "mov $" __stringify(XFEATURE_MASK_X87_AVX) ", %eax\n" - "xor %edx, %edx\n" - "xsave (%rdi)\n" - "jmp guest_sev_es_code"); +static void xsave_all_registers(void *addr) +{ + __asm__ __volatile__( + "mov $" __stringify(XFEATURE_MASK_X87_AVX) ", %eax\n" + "xor %edx, %edx\n" + "xsave (%0)" + : + : "r"(addr) + : "eax", "edx", "memory" + ); +} + +static void guest_code_xsave(void *vmsa_gva) +{ + xsave_all_registers(vmsa_gva); + guest_sev_es_code(); +} static void compare_xsave(u8 *from_host, u8 *from_guest) { -- 2.54.0.545.g6539524ca2-goog