public inbox for linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"marcandre.lureau@redhat.com" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
	"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"tglx@kernel.org" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Qiang, Chenyi" <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/tdx: Handle TDG.MEM.PAGE.ACCEPT success-with-warning returns
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:02:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <928bb81af66232a7c898758e42ad59dc95edd345.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324-tdx-hotplug-fixes-v1-1-8f29f2c17278@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2026-03-24 at 19:21 +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> try_accept_one() treats any non-zero return from __tdcall() as a
> failure. However, per the TDX Module Base Spec (Table SEPT Walk Cases),
> TDG.MEM.PAGE.ACCEPT returns a non-zero status code with bit 63 clear
> when the target page is already in MAPPED state (i.e., already
> accepted). This is a "success-with-warning" -- the page is usable and no
> action is needed.
> 
> Check only bit 63 (TDX_ERROR) to distinguish real errors from
> success-with-warning returns, rather than treating all non-zero values
> as failures.
> 
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>

Hmm. Accepting private memory is a security sensitive operation, so I think it
is probably bad to silently hide the detection of re-accepting.

For example, if the kernel accepts a page and sets some values in it, the VMM
could reset the data to zero by re-adding the page and letting the second accept
zero it. It allows the VMM to have some limited ability to mess with guest data.
If we detect a re-accept we should probably warn on it actually.

Not sure on if the specific case in this series is problematic, but this patch
changes the behavior generally.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-24 15:21 [PATCH 0/2] x86/tdx: Fix memory hotplug in TDX guests Marc-André Lureau
2026-03-24 15:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/tdx: Handle TDG.MEM.PAGE.ACCEPT success-with-warning returns Marc-André Lureau
2026-03-24 22:02   ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2026-03-24 15:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/tdx: Accept hotplugged memory before online Marc-André Lureau
2026-03-24 22:03   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-03-25 10:29     ` Marc-André Lureau
2026-03-25 17:21       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-03-26 18:25         ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-03-26 20:40           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-03-27  3:05       ` Chenyi Qiang
2026-03-27  8:49         ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-27  8:28   ` Yan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=928bb81af66232a7c898758e42ad59dc95edd345.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox