From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/15] iommufd/device: Hold a KVM file reference for the device lifetime
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 23:25:46 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97053bb6-c221-4ae0-972c-603b194ec25a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB4835982DE81AFE060EEE01B88C762@CO1PR11MB4835.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 6/11/26 18:16, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2026 12:16 AM
>>
>> The KVM file stored in an iommufd_device currently relies on the
>> reference held by VFIO while the device is open. Normally, unbind waits
>> for outstanding device references before VFIO drops its KVM reference.
>> However, REMOVE_WAIT only waits for 60 seconds. If that timeout expires,
>> the device object remains in the iommufd xarray.
>>
>> For example, an IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO ioctl can hold a device reference
>> while
>> blocked on a userspace buffer fault:
>>
>> iommufd_fops_ioctl()
>> iommufd_get_hw_info()
>> iommufd_get_device()
>> iommufd_get_object()
>> iommufd_lock_obj() /* takes users and wait_cnt refs */
>> copy_to_user() / clear_user() /* may block before putting refs */
>>
>> A concurrent final release of the VFIO device file takes this path:
>>
>> vfio_device_fops_release()
>> vfio_df_unbind_iommufd()
>> vfio_df_close()
>> vfio_df_device_last_close()
>> vfio_df_iommufd_unbind()
>> vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind()
>> iommufd_device_unbind()
>> iommufd_object_destroy_user()
>> iommufd_object_remove(..., REMOVE_WAIT)
>> iommufd_object_dec_wait() /* timeout: -EBUSY */
>> WARN_ON(ret)
>> vfio_device_put_kvm()
>> fput(device->kvm)
>>
>> iommufd_object_destroy_user() warns on -EBUSY but does not propagate it:
>> iommufd_device_unbind() returns void. Thus VFIO close effectively ignores
>> the unbind failure and proceeds to drop its KVM file reference even
>> though the iommufd_device is still alive and its ID remains usable.
>>
>> Once the remaining KVM file references are released, a later ioctl on
>> the still-open iommufd can access the stale pointer:
>>
>> iommufd_fops_ioctl()
>> iommufd_viommu_alloc_ioctl()
>> iommufd_get_device() /* finds the surviving device ID */
>> get_file(idev->kvm_file) /* accesses the freed KVM file */
>>
>> Take a KVM file reference when binding the device and release it when
>> the iommufd_device is actually destroyed. Release it before the igroup
>> check in the destructor so that bind failure cleanup is covered too.
>> Document the ownership in the bind API and device structure.
>
> I don't think this needs to be fixed. There is already a WARN_ON()
> in iommufd_object_destroy_user() and many bad things could
> happen afterwards...
imho it is just a right thing to do - hold a reference to the pointer in a structure.
> If we really think an ioctl could take more than 60s in sane scenarios,
It is quite possible when some TSM operation involves (in)validation of hundreds GBs of MMIO.
> it's a more complex issue to be handled in iommufd core.
>
>>
>> Fixes: d8bb80c8f0e5 ("iommufd/device: Associate KVM file pointer with
>> iommufd_device")
>
> btw no fix tag for an issue introduced by an earlier patch in the
> same series.
+1. should be just squashed into 05/15. Thanks,
--
Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 16:16 [PATCH v8 00/15] iommufd: TSM-backed virtual IOMMUs for confidential guests Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] PCI/TSM: Move core code into its own directory Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-05 12:24 ` kernel test robot
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] virt: coco: tsm: Remove the device from lookup before PCI teardown Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-06 7:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-12 11:14 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] virt: coco: tsm: Complete PCI registration before publishing the device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-12 11:41 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 04/15] virt: coco: tsm: Require PCI operations when registering a TSM Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] iommufd/device: Associate KVM file pointer with iommufd_device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-06 7:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] iommufd/device: Hold a KVM file reference for the device lifetime Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-06 7:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-12 12:25 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] iommufd/viommu: Keep a reference to the KVM file Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:35 ` Jacob Pan
2026-11-06 7:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] iommufd: Add a vDEVICE operation ioctl framework Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-06 7:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] PCI/TSM: Remove the legacy guest request interface Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] PCI/TSM: Add vIOMMU-bound device contexts Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-06 7:33 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-11 16:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] iommufd/viommu: Select vIOMMU operations before allocation Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-05 9:10 ` kernel test robot
2026-11-05 14:49 ` kernel test robot
2026-11-06 7:47 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-12 10:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] iommufd/viommu: Allow PCI TSM backends to provide vIOMMU operations Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 23:23 ` Jacob Pan
2026-11-05 0:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-05 17:16 ` Jacob Pan
2026-11-06 8:03 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-09 18:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-06 7:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-11-12 10:51 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] iommufd/viommu: Allow vIOMMUs without a parent HWPT Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 19:03 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-11-04 19:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-05 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-11-05 17:44 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-11-05 18:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-05 18:40 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-11-05 20:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] PCI/TSM: Wait for device contexts before removing a DSM Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] PCI/TSM: Wait for users during unregister Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97053bb6-c221-4ae0-972c-603b194ec25a@amd.com \
--to=aik@amd.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox