From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A3FD156CB
	for <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:40:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 453DBC433C9;
	Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:40:29 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20201202; t=1690573231;
	bh=qJSSXg7Vv8HfsIe6IzeuukyvrA8LHNwx15c3kihE4MY=;
	h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=u02bMwQYkSQgP5ED1FN0HqlsYwUM4SznWO+fxaXJvlcV7S5o+37OM8TrjoODwoxn2
	 /2cSmEOn7JTnOSKFb7iBplxH6p+ZVAXJrp63KXeO4A67sr7XBP/ckvW4Gi8PsJrZ7i
	 NNU0RH7/DrS9tq3aT27rNYkzYkPjojU9+iau3j+ASB/LgkcbG/2FCzSBt3CS1QIAYW
	 YGXUkgOYqzbsKltBsbO3rPGuWZRb7dZ2cGdieLUoa1xnIWmnkA+sFARiropO2fooaN
	 0H5bVmOw9ribjWF/PXMlV89rkzIe8iLrPZxyQ9yexIG9i+87ddJH7fwdnne642pk5c
	 XS1eDId1tA63w==
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <linux-coco.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-coco+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-coco+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:40:27 +0000
Message-Id: <CUE26Z3BST2Z.3OTO2IP6Y5PFV@seitikki>
Cc: "Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan"
 <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>, "Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan"
 <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>, "Dionna Amalie Glaze"
 <dionnaglaze@google.com>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
 <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
 <peterz@infradead.org>, <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
 <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] keys: Introduce tsm keys
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <dhowells@redhat.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.14.0
References: <169057265210.180586.7950140104251236598.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com> <169057265801.180586.10867293237672839356.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <169057265801.180586.10867293237672839356.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com>

On Fri Jul 28, 2023 at 7:30 PM UTC, Dan Williams wrote:
> One of the common operations of a TSM (Trusted Security Module) is to
> provide a way for a TVM (confidential computing guest execution
> environment) to take a measurement of its run state and use that with a
> key-exchange protocol to establish a shared secret with a third-party /
> remote attestation agent. The concept is common across TSMs, but the

This is obfuscated "white paper" alike language.

I have no idea what TSM's and TVM's are and I do not want to know. Even
confidential computing is useless buzzword in the context of providing
a key type for attestation.

I would replace "tsm" with "attestation".

BR, Jarkko