From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: isaku.yamahata@intel.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
erdemaktas@google.com, Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>,
chen.bo@intel.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 04/10] KVM: x86: Introduce PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK to indicate fault is private
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:11:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLqSH/lEbHEnQ9i8@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f474282d701aca7af00e4f7171445abb5e734c6f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
s/Introduce/Use
This doesn't "introduce" anything, in the sense that it's an AMD-defined error
code flag. That matters because KVM *did* introduce/define PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
>
> Add two PFERR codes to designate that the page fault is private and that
> it requires looking up memory attributes. The vendor kvm page fault
> handler should set PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK bit based on their fault
> information. It may or may not use the hardware value directly or
> parse the hardware value to set the bit.
>
> For KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM, ask memory attributes for the fault privateness.
...
> +static inline bool kvm_is_fault_private(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code)
> +{
> + /*
> + * This is racy with mmu_seq. If we hit a race, it would result in a
> + * spurious KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT.
> + */
> + if (kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM)
> + return kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gpa_to_gfn(gpa));
Please synthesize the error code flag for SW-protected VMs, same as TDX, e.g.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 20e289e872eb..de9e0a9c41e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5751,6 +5751,10 @@ int noinline kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 err
if (WARN_ON(!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root.hpa)))
return RET_PF_RETRY;
+ if (vcpu->kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM &&
+ kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(cr2_or_gpa)))
+ error_code |= PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK;
+
r = RET_PF_INVALID;
if (unlikely(error_code & PFERR_RSVD_MASK)) {
r = handle_mmio_page_fault(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, direct);
Functionally it's the same, but I want all VM types to have the same source of
truth for private versus shared, and I really don't want kvm_is_fault_private()
to exist.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 23:32 [RFC PATCH v4 00/10] KVM: guest_memfd(), X86: Common base for SNP and TDX (was KVM: guest memory: Misc enhancement) isaku.yamahata
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/10] KVM: x86: Add is_vm_type_supported callback isaku.yamahata
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Guard against collision with KVM-defined PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS isaku.yamahata
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass around full 64-bit error code for the KVM page fault isaku.yamahata
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/10] KVM: x86: Introduce PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK to indicate fault is private isaku.yamahata
2023-07-21 14:11 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-07-22 0:52 ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-02-22 2:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/10] KVM: Add new members to struct kvm_gfn_range to operate on isaku.yamahata
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/10] KVM: x86: Export the kvm_zap_gfn_range() for the SNP use isaku.yamahata
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/10] KVM: x86: Add gmem hook for initializing private memory isaku.yamahata
2023-07-21 14:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-22 0:34 ` Michael Roth
2023-08-18 22:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-26 0:59 ` Michael Roth
2023-08-29 13:27 ` Michael Roth
2023-09-08 23:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/10] KVM: x86: Add gmem hook for invalidating " isaku.yamahata
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/10] KVM: x86: Make struct sev_cmd common for KVM_MEM_ENC_OP isaku.yamahata
2023-07-21 14:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 18:43 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-25 9:07 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-25 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27 0:37 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 23:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/10] KVM: X86: KVM_MEM_ENC_OP check if unused field (flags, error) is zero isaku.yamahata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLqSH/lEbHEnQ9i8@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chen.bo@intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=yuan.yao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).