Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/random: Issue a warning if RDRAND or RDSEED fails

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 07:12:47PM -0600, Dr. Greg wrote:
> 
> Actually, I now believe there is clear evidence that the problem is
> indeed Intel specific.  In light of our testing, it will be
> interesting to see what your 'AR' returns with respect to an official
> response from Intel engineering on this issue.
> 
> One of the very bright young engineers collaborating on Quixote, who
> has been following this conversation, took it upon himself to do some
> very methodical engineering analysis on this issue.  I'm the messenger
> but this is very much his work product.
> 
> Executive summary is as follows:
> 
> - No RDRAND depletion failures were observable with either the Intel
>   or AMD hardware that was load tested.
> 
> - RDSEED depletion is an Intel specific issue, AMD's RDSEED
>   implementation could not be provoked into failure.

My colleague ran a multithread parallel stress test program on
his 16core/2HT AMD Ryzen (Zen4 uarch) and saw a 80% failure rate
in RDSEED.

> - AMD's RDRAND/RDSEED implementation is significantly slower than
>   Intel's.

Yes, we also noticed the AMD impl is horribly slow compared to Intel,
had to cut test iterations x100

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|