linux-coco.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com,  jroedel@suse.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	pgonda@google.com,  ashish.kalra@amd.com, bp@alien8.de,
	pankaj.gupta@amd.com,  liam.merwick@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] KVM: Introduce KVM_EXIT_COCO exit type
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 07:22:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnwkMyy1kgu0dFdv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621134041.3170480-5-michael.roth@amd.com>

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, Michael Roth wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index ecfa25b505e7..2eea9828d9aa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -7122,6 +7122,97 @@ Please note that the kernel is allowed to use the kvm_run structure as the
>  primary storage for certain register types. Therefore, the kernel may use the
>  values in kvm_run even if the corresponding bit in kvm_dirty_regs is not set.
>  
> +::
> +
> +		/* KVM_EXIT_COCO */
> +		struct kvm_exit_coco {
> +		#define KVM_EXIT_COCO_REQ_CERTS			0
> +		#define KVM_EXIT_COCO_MAX			1
> +			__u8 nr;
> +			__u8 pad0[7];
> +			union {
> +				struct {
> +					__u64 gfn;
> +					__u32 npages;
> +		#define KVM_EXIT_COCO_REQ_CERTS_ERR_INVALID_LEN		1
> +		#define KVM_EXIT_COCO_REQ_CERTS_ERR_GENERIC		(1 << 31)

Unless I'm mistaken, these error codes are defined by the GHCB, which means the
values matter, i.e. aren't arbitrary KVM-defined values.

I forget exactly what we discussed in PUCK, but for the error codes, I think KVM
should either define it's own values that are completely disconnected from any
"harware" spec, or KVM should very explicitly #define all hardware values and have
the semantics of "ret" be vendor specific.  A hybrid approach doesn't really work,
e.g. KVM_EXIT_COCO_REQ_CERTS_ERR_GENERIC isn't used anywhere and and looks quite odd.

My vote is for vendor specific error codes, because unlike having a common user
exit reason+struct, I don't think arch-neutral error codes will minimize KVM's ABI,
I think it'll do the exact opposite.  The only thing we need to require is that
'0' == success.

E.g. I think we can end up with something like:

  static int snp_complete_req_certs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
	struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;

	if (vcpu->run->coco.req_certs.ret)
		if (vcpu->run->coco.req_certs.ret == SNP_GUEST_VMM_ERR_INVALID_LEN)
			vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX] = vcpu->run->coco.req_certs.npages;

		ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb,
					SNP_GUEST_ERR(vcpu->run->coco.req_certs.ret, 0));
		return 1;
	}

	return snp_handle_guest_req(svm, control->exit_info_1, control->exit_info_2);
  }

> +					__u32 ret;
> +				} req_certs;
> +			};

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-26 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-21 13:40 [PATCH v1 0/5] SEV-SNP: Add KVM support for attestation and KVM_EXIT_COCO Michael Roth
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] KVM: SEV: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event Michael Roth
2024-06-21 15:52   ` Liam Merwick
2024-06-21 16:17     ` Michael Roth
2024-06-21 17:15   ` [PATCH v1-revised " Michael Roth
2024-06-22  0:13     ` Liam Merwick
2024-06-26 14:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-26 13:58   ` [PATCH v1 " Sean Christopherson
2024-06-26 15:45     ` Michael Roth
2024-06-26 17:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-26 17:42         ` Michael Roth
2024-06-26 19:54           ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-27 14:48             ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-27 15:35               ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-27 16:23                 ` Peter Gonda
2024-06-27 17:13                 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-27 18:07                   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] x86/sev: Move sev_guest.h into common SEV header Michael Roth
2024-06-21 16:42   ` Liam Merwick
2024-06-21 18:07   ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] KVM: SEV: Provide support for SNP_EXTENDED_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event Michael Roth
2024-06-21 16:45   ` Liam Merwick
2024-06-21 19:21   ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-22 20:28   ` Carlos Bilbao
2024-06-24 13:05     ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-24 15:02       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] KVM: Introduce KVM_EXIT_COCO exit type Michael Roth
2024-06-26 14:22   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-06-26 17:30     ` Michael Roth
2024-06-28 20:08       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-29  0:36         ` Michael Roth
2024-07-26  7:15           ` Binbin Wu
2024-09-13 16:29             ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2024-10-28 18:20               ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 20:53                 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2024-11-01 21:52                   ` Michael Roth
2024-11-01 23:54                     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2024-11-19 13:53             ` Michael Roth
2024-11-20  4:03               ` Binbin Wu
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] KVM: SEV: Add certificate support for SNP_EXTENDED_GUEST_REQUEST events Michael Roth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZnwkMyy1kgu0dFdv@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).