From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, jroedel@suse.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
pgonda@google.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com, bp@alien8.de,
pankaj.gupta@amd.com, liam.merwick@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] KVM: Introduce KVM_EXIT_COCO exit type
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 07:22:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnwkMyy1kgu0dFdv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621134041.3170480-5-michael.roth@amd.com>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, Michael Roth wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index ecfa25b505e7..2eea9828d9aa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -7122,6 +7122,97 @@ Please note that the kernel is allowed to use the kvm_run structure as the
> primary storage for certain register types. Therefore, the kernel may use the
> values in kvm_run even if the corresponding bit in kvm_dirty_regs is not set.
>
> +::
> +
> + /* KVM_EXIT_COCO */
> + struct kvm_exit_coco {
> + #define KVM_EXIT_COCO_REQ_CERTS 0
> + #define KVM_EXIT_COCO_MAX 1
> + __u8 nr;
> + __u8 pad0[7];
> + union {
> + struct {
> + __u64 gfn;
> + __u32 npages;
> + #define KVM_EXIT_COCO_REQ_CERTS_ERR_INVALID_LEN 1
> + #define KVM_EXIT_COCO_REQ_CERTS_ERR_GENERIC (1 << 31)
Unless I'm mistaken, these error codes are defined by the GHCB, which means the
values matter, i.e. aren't arbitrary KVM-defined values.
I forget exactly what we discussed in PUCK, but for the error codes, I think KVM
should either define it's own values that are completely disconnected from any
"harware" spec, or KVM should very explicitly #define all hardware values and have
the semantics of "ret" be vendor specific. A hybrid approach doesn't really work,
e.g. KVM_EXIT_COCO_REQ_CERTS_ERR_GENERIC isn't used anywhere and and looks quite odd.
My vote is for vendor specific error codes, because unlike having a common user
exit reason+struct, I don't think arch-neutral error codes will minimize KVM's ABI,
I think it'll do the exact opposite. The only thing we need to require is that
'0' == success.
E.g. I think we can end up with something like:
static int snp_complete_req_certs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;
if (vcpu->run->coco.req_certs.ret)
if (vcpu->run->coco.req_certs.ret == SNP_GUEST_VMM_ERR_INVALID_LEN)
vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX] = vcpu->run->coco.req_certs.npages;
ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb,
SNP_GUEST_ERR(vcpu->run->coco.req_certs.ret, 0));
return 1;
}
return snp_handle_guest_req(svm, control->exit_info_1, control->exit_info_2);
}
> + __u32 ret;
> + } req_certs;
> + };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 13:40 [PATCH v1 0/5] SEV-SNP: Add KVM support for attestation and KVM_EXIT_COCO Michael Roth
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] KVM: SEV: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event Michael Roth
2024-06-21 15:52 ` Liam Merwick
2024-06-21 16:17 ` Michael Roth
2024-06-21 17:15 ` [PATCH v1-revised " Michael Roth
2024-06-22 0:13 ` Liam Merwick
2024-06-26 14:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-26 13:58 ` [PATCH v1 " Sean Christopherson
2024-06-26 15:45 ` Michael Roth
2024-06-26 17:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-26 17:42 ` Michael Roth
2024-06-26 19:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-27 14:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-27 15:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-27 16:23 ` Peter Gonda
2024-06-27 17:13 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-27 18:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] x86/sev: Move sev_guest.h into common SEV header Michael Roth
2024-06-21 16:42 ` Liam Merwick
2024-06-21 18:07 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] KVM: SEV: Provide support for SNP_EXTENDED_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event Michael Roth
2024-06-21 16:45 ` Liam Merwick
2024-06-21 19:21 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-22 20:28 ` Carlos Bilbao
2024-06-24 13:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-06-24 15:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] KVM: Introduce KVM_EXIT_COCO exit type Michael Roth
2024-06-26 14:22 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-06-26 17:30 ` Michael Roth
2024-06-28 20:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-29 0:36 ` Michael Roth
2024-07-26 7:15 ` Binbin Wu
2024-09-13 16:29 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2024-10-28 18:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 20:53 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2024-11-01 21:52 ` Michael Roth
2024-11-01 23:54 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2024-11-19 13:53 ` Michael Roth
2024-11-20 4:03 ` Binbin Wu
2024-06-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] KVM: SEV: Add certificate support for SNP_EXTENDED_GUEST_REQUEST events Michael Roth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnwkMyy1kgu0dFdv@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).